LISTSERV - LEADFREE Archives - LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

LEADFREE Archives

January 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	LEADFREE Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:

Subject	From	Date
Re: Cadmium in relay & switch contacts - Used to be [LF] RoH S, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Temkin, Gregg	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:56:22 -0800
Re: Cadmium in relay & switch contacts - Used to be [LF] RoH S, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	David Shaff	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:41:14 -0700
Re: Cadmium in relay & switch contacts - Used to be [LF] RoH S, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Hilty, Robert D	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:26:05 -0500
Re: Cadmium in relay & switch contacts - Used to be [LF] RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Pratap Singh	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:03:16 -0600
Cadmium in relay & switch contacts - Used to be [LF] RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Camille Good	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:44:14 -0800
Re: [EN] A new plan to recycle old PCs may forestall regulation	Harvey Miller	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:57:05 -0800
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	James, Chris	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:59:38 -0000
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Kay Nimmo	Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:55:24 -0000
Re: WEEE- Is NCH borned and working?	James, Chris	Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:57:51 -0000
WEEE- Is NCH borned and working?	Ken Patel	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:27:49 -0800
Re: NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)...-Classifications	Dennis Fritz	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:47:20 EST
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Daniel Devlin	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:45:20 -0500
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Genny Gibbard	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:01:00 -0600
AW: [LF] RoHS Labelling again!	Stobbe, Irina	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:45:42 +0100
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	James, Chris	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:26:35 -0000
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	David Suraski	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:12:56 -0500
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Genny Gibbard	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:09:46 -0600
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Genny Gibbard	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:08:53 -0600
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Dennis Fritz	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:07:02 EST
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Genny Gibbard	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:06:42 -0600
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Chris Robertson	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:55:31 -0600
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Kallin, Dan	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:36:25 -0500
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:37:53 -0000
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	to Paul Taylor	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:33:42 +0000
Re: California SB20 and SB50	Clayton Bonn	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:39:01 -0700
Leadfree: ceramic capacitors and resistor - Aren't they electroni cs ceramic parts?	Ken Patel	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:49:33 -0800
Re: California SB20 and SB50	Phil Nixon	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:43:33 -0800
Re: California SB20 and SB50	Kallin, Dan	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:42:07 -0500
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Roger Stoops	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:39:33 -0500
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Smith, Rick	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:31:36 -0600
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	David Suraski	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:20:53 -0500
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Pratap Singh	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:16:09 -0600
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	David D. Hillman	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:04:36 -0600
Re: Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	David Suraski	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:38:08 -0500
Does anyone expect 63/37 Solder to disappear?	Hal Winslow	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:23:28 -0500
California SB20 and SB50	John Barnes	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:23:36 -0500
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	to Paul Taylor	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:43:15 +0000
Re: Material Declaration form v/s CoC (certificate of compliance)	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:39:45 -0000
Re: AW: [LF] RoHS Labelling again!	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:27:29 -0000
AW: [LF] RoHS Labelling again!	Stobbe, Irina	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:43:25 +0100
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:27:37 -0000
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Ron Fonsaer	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:51:24 +0100
Re: RE: [LF] RE: [LF] Re: [LF] NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)	Reuven ROKAH	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:27:10 +0200
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Romm, Doug	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:25:39 -0600
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Camille Good	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:14:18 -0800
RE: [LF] RE: [LF] Re: [LF] NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)	Bruce Euzent	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:21:07 -0800
RE: [LF] Re: [LF] NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)	Hilty, Robert D	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:55:17 -0500
Re: [LF] NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)	Dennis Fritz	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:35:52 EST
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	John Barnes	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:22:34 -0500
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Kay Nimmo	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:01:27 -0000
Re: Third-world recycling and ignorance	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:11:42 -0600
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:41:06 -0600
Re: e-waste	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:47:02 -0600
Re: tin whiskers	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:30:25 -0600
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	Shawn Vike (By way of [log in to unmask])	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:54:01 -0700
Re: Third-world recycling and ignorance	Thorup, John	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:20:58 -0800
Re: Are we Exempt?	to Paul Taylor	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:12:32 +0000
e-waste	Charles Dolci	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:02:19 -0800
Re: RoHS Labelling again!	James, Chris	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:35:15 -0000
Cadmium contacts	Davy, Gordon	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:31:51 -0500
RoHS Labelling again!	to Paul Taylor	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:12:05 +0000
tin whiskers	James, Chris	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:57:23 -0000
Re: Material Declaration form v/s CoC (certificate of compliance)	Smith, Rick	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:55:19 -0600
Re: NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)	Hilty, Robert D	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:11:17 -0500
NEMI Class 2 (Wisker length 40 micron max)	Reuven ROKAH	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:30:14 +0200
Re: Material Declaration form v/s CoC (certificate of compliance)	James, Chris	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:09:15 -0000
Re: SnBi as components coating	James Vincent	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:11:16 -0800
Re: Material Declaration form v/s CoC (certificate of compliance)	James, Chris	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:08:27 -0000
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Kay Nimmo	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:15:50 -0000
Re: Third-world recycling and ignorance	Charles Dolci	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:59:53 -0800
Material Declaration form v/s CoC (certificate of compliance)	Ken Patel	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:13:12 -0800
Re: RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Davy, Gordon	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:18:57 -0500
RoHS, Lead-Free and North American regulatory agencies?	Camille Good	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:38:12 -0800
Re: SnBi as components coating	Bev Christian	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:51:29 -0500
Re: SnBi as components coating	Camille Good	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:30:09 -0800
SnBi as components coating	Ofer Cohen	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:00:24 +0200
Re: AW: [LF] Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:06:16 -0500
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	Carpentier Kristiaan	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:55:40 +0100
Re: Testing for lead	Richard Kraszewski	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:55:33 -0500
Testing for lead	Dan Dodson	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:51:51 -0600
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	Scott Hoeptner	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:33:38 -0800
Re: Lead, vinegar, Basel Convention, ignorance thread	Robin Ingenthron	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:27:56 -0500
Re: Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Munie, Gregory	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:26:54 -0600
Re: Lead, vinegar - TCLP thread	Robin Ingenthron	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:45:21 -0500
AW: [LF] Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Karl Heinz Zuber	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:58:32 +0100
Re: Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Brian Ellis	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:41:28 +0200
Re: Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:29:39 -0000
Re: Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Bev Christian	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:07:24 -0500
Re: Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Robin Ingenthron	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:46:32 -0500
Re: Specific halogens question	Camille Good	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:58:46 -0800
Re: Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Danielle Casha	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:47:08 -0500
Lead, vinegar and garbage (yum)	Bev Christian	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:50:48 -0500
Re: Third-world recycling and ignorance	Danielle Casha	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:00:36 -0500
Sorry!	Davy, Gordon	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:50:42 -0500
FW: [LF] Honesty	Davy, Gordon	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:33:28 -0500
Re: Third-world recycling and ignorance	Wenger, George M.	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:27:59 -0500
Forced conversion	Davy, Gordon	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:19:00 -0500
Re: Third-world recycling and ignorance	Danielle Casha	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:12:17 -0500
Third-world recycling and ignorance	Davy, Gordon	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:48:54 -0500
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation	David D. Hillman	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:17:18 -0600
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation	Lee Whiteman	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:09:54 -0500
Re: Who will be ready in time for RoHS? Other questions for Ms. Wallstrom--	Danielle Casha	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:31:33 -0500
Re: For WEEE Directive: Cenelec EN 50419	James, Chris	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:13:32 -0000
For WEEE Directive: Cenelec EN 50419	Ken Patel	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:19:59 -0800
Re: Airplane refurbishment, Electronics remanufacturing	Robin Ingenthron	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:31:09 -0500
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	David D. Hillman	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:32:39 -0600
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	James, Chris	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:19:48 -0000
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	Bev Christian	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:19:45 -0500
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	David D. Hillman	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:09:59 -0600
AW: [LF] Honesty	Karl Heinz Zuber	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:37:34 +0100
Re: Lead and soil contamination - shooting range	James, Chris	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:21:22 -0000
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	Brian Ellis	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:14:23 +0200
Re: Specific halogens question	Brian Ellis	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:10:00 +0200
Re: Lead and soil contamination - shooting range	Brian Ellis	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:08:49 +0200
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Kay Nimmo	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:48:32 -0000
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	Bache, Paul	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:09:45 -0000
Re: Lead and soil contamination - shooting range	Charles Dolci	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:44:34 -0800
Re: Who will be ready in time for RoHS? Otherr questiosn for Ms. Wallstrom--	Charles Dolci	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:41:33 -0800
Claims - Data - Honesty	Wenger, George M.	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:11:38 -0500
Re: Honesty	Wenger, George M.	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:48:28 -0500
Honesty	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:31:39 -0500
Lead and soil contamination - shooting range	Pratap Singh	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:21:47 -0600
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:09:26 -0500
Re: Who will be ready in time for RoHS? Otherr questiosn for Ms. Wallstrom--	Pratap Singh	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:04:42 -0600
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Kallin, Dan	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:54:53 -0500
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:31:28 -0500
Re: Who will be ready in time for RoHS? Otherr questiosn for Ms. Wallstrom--	Harvey Miller	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:33:36 -0800
Re: Are Ceramic caps, resistors and others exempted?	Indrek Rebane	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:10:43 +0200
Specific halogens question	Ofer Cohen	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:08:24 +0200
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th... NTC	Bev Christian	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:07:28 -0500
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is th...	<>	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:03:50 EST
Re: Who will be ready in time for RoHS? Otherr questiosn for Ms. Wallstrom--	Pascal Guiheneuf	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:39:28 +0100
Are Ceramic caps, resistors and others exempted?	Ken Patel	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:30:20 -0800
Re: Who will be ready in time for RoHS? Otherr questiosn for Ms. Wallstrom--	Harvey Miller	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:25:32 -0800
Re: AW: [LF] Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Pascal Guiheneuf	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:19:11 +0100
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Indrek Rebane	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:52:54 +0200
AW: [LF] AW: [LF] WEEE/RoHS Implementation in Germany	No Name	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:47:35 +0100
Re: AW: [LF] Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:19:49 -0500
Who will be ready in time for RoHS?	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:13:35 -0500
AW: [LF] Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	No Name	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:55:59 +0100
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Kay Nimmo	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:45:57 -0000
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Pascal Guiheneuf	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:42:36 +0100
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:35:46 -0500
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Brian Ellis	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:02:57 +0200
Re: Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	Indrek Rebane	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:17:36 +0200
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Kay Nimmo	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:07:13 -0000
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Pascal Guiheneuf	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:57:39 +0100
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Brian Ellis	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:46:49 +0200
Estonia and WEEE/RoHS Implementation	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:40:43 -0600
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:01:26 -0600
Re: Definition of "WEEE from private households"	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:47:02 -0600
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Davy, Gordon	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:57:33 -0500
Re: UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Kallin, Dan	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:20:10 -0500
WEEE and RoHS directives implementation in US	Ken Patel	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:35:27 -0800
UK draft RoHS regulations and guidance and TAC decisions	Davy, Gordon	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:56:01 -0500
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is there one from any member country???	John Barnes	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:24:15 -0500
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documenta tion - is there one from any member country???	John Burke	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:33:05 -0800
Re: WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is there one from any member country???	James, Chris	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:32:51 -0000
WEEE Directive: Member State's implementation documentation - is there one from any member country???	Ken Patel	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:25:03 -0800
Re: NTC--Lead-free musical instruments	Roger Stoops	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:01:30 -0500
Re: Lead-free musical instruments(NTC)	<>	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:50:04 EST
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	Indrek Rebane	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:37:53 +0200
Re: Definition of "WEEE from private households"	Indrek Rebane	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:28:37 +0200
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:23:24 -0600
Definition of "WEEE from private households"	Ken Patel	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:06:25 -0800
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	John Burke	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:35:01 -0800
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Roger Stoops	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:51:57 -0500
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	Ryan Grant	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:02:17 -0700
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:23:10 -0700
Hexavalent Chromium replacements	Reuven ROKAH	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:18:07 +0200
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	Davy, Gordon	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:16:45 -0500
Re: Halogen free alert	Mike Fenner	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:49:42 -0000
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Chris Robertson	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:52:03 -0000
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Kay Nimmo	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:43:03 -0000
Re: Lead-free musical instruments	<>	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:41:31 EST
Re: California SB 20	Ken Patel	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:25:14 -0800
Lead-free musical instruments	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:22:38 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	David Douthit	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:12:57 -0700
Re: Halogen free alert	Werner Engelmaier	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:14:16 EST
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:26:06 -0000
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Roger Stoops	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:00:50 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Wilson Carlos MAIA Filho	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:21:59 +0100
Re: Halogen free alert	Brian Ellis	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:10:54 +0200
Re: Antw: [LF] RoHS substances	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:54:25 -0000
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:46:15 -0000
Antw: [LF] RoHS substances	Guenter Grossmann	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:37:46 +0100
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Chris Robertson	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:12:21 -0000
Re: Halogen free alert	Ofer Cohen	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:01:12 +0200
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	MA/NY DDave	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:24:15 -0600
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:40:00 -0600
Re: Halogen free alert	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:05:43 -0600
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:37:03 EST
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Boyd, Mark	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:37:51 -0800
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	<>	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:30:38 EST
Re: Halogen free alert	Thomi	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:14:27 +0100
Re: RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Roger Stoops	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:08:11 -0500
RoHS treatment of Lead in glass of motorized lenses	Boyd, Mark	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:57:51 -0800
California Bill 20 & 50 ---Recycling collection fees	Ken Patel	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:58:12 -0800
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	Kallin, Dan	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:39:17 -0500
Re: Halogen free alert	Brian Ellis	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:00:55 +0200
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:04:58 -0600
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:52:29 -0600
Re: FW: RoHS Compliance test methods	Richard Kraszewski	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:38:54 -0500
Re: Halogen free alert	Thomi	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:15:41 +0100
FW: Declaration Process Management Subcommittee - Notice of meeting in Tempe	Fern Abrams	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:02:06 -0600
Re: What do we mean by Self Declaration by UK's DTI	Fern Abrams	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:58:12 -0600
FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Fern Abrams	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:49:53 -0600
Re: Question about Halogen-Free PCBs	Lee Parker	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:26:18 -0500
Re: Question about Halogen-Free PCBs	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:10:24 -0600
Antw: Re: [LF] Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Guenter Grossmann	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:38:16 +0100
Re: RoHS substances	MacFadden, Todd	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:24:53 -0500
RoHS substances	Kay Nimmo	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:10:32 -0000
Re: Books on leadfree implementation	John Barnes	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:26:53 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Pascal Guiheneuf	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:32:08 +0100
Re: Question about Halogen-Free PCBs	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:53:36 -0600
Re: Question about Halogen-Free PCBs	MacFadden, Todd	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:09:22 -0500
Question about Halogen-Free PCBs	Camille Good	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:39:25 -0800
Re: SELF-DECLARATION of leadfree products - UK Department of Trade an d Industry	John Burke	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:03:18 -0800
Re: SELF-DECLARATION of leadfree products - UK Department of Trade an d Industry	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:55:06 -0600
What do we mean by Self Declaration by UK's DTI	Ken Patel	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:46:30 -0800
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:35:03 -0600
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	Kallin, Dan	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:22:31 -0500
Re: Halogen free alert	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:37:22 -0600
Re: Halogen free alert	Lee Parker	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:29:13 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	<>	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:46:51 EST
Re: Are we Exempt?	John Burke	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:33:06 -0800
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	<>	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:18:10 EST
Re: Are we Exempt?	Genny Gibbard	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:01:27 -0600
Re: Halogen free alert	Mike Anderson	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:31:34 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Pascal Guiheneuf	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:03:00 +0100
Halogen free alert	Ofer Cohen	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:56:24 +0200
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:39:38 -0600
Re: IPC-1066 question: Lead content in steel and Aluminum	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:25:03 -0600
Re: Are we Exempt?	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:11:07 -0600
Re: Books on leadfree implementation	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:39:06 -0600
Re: Books on leadfree implementation	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:27:55 -0600
Re: Books on leadfree implementation	David Douthit	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:55:26 -0700
Re: Books on leadfree implementation	John Barnes	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:15:54 -0500
SELF-DECLARATION of leadfree products - UK Department of Trade an d Industry	Ken Patel	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:50:32 -0800
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:46:24 EST
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	David D. Hillman	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:44:12 -0600
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:38:47 EST
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:26:24 EST
Re: Books on leadfree implementation	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:43:21 -0700
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Bruce D Stilmack	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:13:29 -0500
Books on leadfree implementation	Ken Patel	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:09:27 -0800
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Chris Ball	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:55:48 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:46:57 EST
Re: Why not try not thermal Accelerated accelerations	Jack Sherman	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:30:07 -0800
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	David Douthit	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:42:09 -0700
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor-use of Accelerated accelerations	Tempea, Ioan	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:40:00 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor-use of Accelerated accelerations	Jack Sherman	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:39:38 -0800
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Tempea, Ioan	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:46:00 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Vladimir Igoshev	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:38:05 -0500
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	<>	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:21:05 EST
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Pascal Guiheneuf	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:04:06 +0100
Re: Vision	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:01:25 -0700
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Jack Sherman	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:00:22 -0800
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Vladimir Igoshev	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:57:38 -0500
Re: Vision	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:44:50 EST
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Pascal Guiheneuf	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:40:22 +0100
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:22:25 EST
Assembly of complex board	Ofer Cohen	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:37:02 +0200
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Ofer Cohen	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:34:23 +0200
Antw: Re: [LF] Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Guenter Grossmann	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:16:36 +0100
Re: Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	David Douthit	Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:29:01 -0700
Re: Vision	Pascal Guiheneuf	Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:15:19 +0100
Re: Vision	James, Chris	Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:25:18 -0000
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	James, Chris	Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:20:39 -0000
Lead-Free Acceleration Factor	Pascal Guiheneuf	Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:02:29 +0100
Re: WEEE labeling requirement	Camille Good	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:12:01 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Genny Gibbard	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:04:40 -0600
Re: The use of Bismuth	Leo Higgins	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:43:39 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Brian Epstein	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:37:15 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:31:54 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Richard Schumacher	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:05:26 -0600
Re: The use of Bismuth	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:47:14 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Leo Higgins	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:59:30 -0800
WEEE labeling requirement	Ken Patel	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:28:41 -0800
Re: Vision	Brian Ellis	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:57:29 +0200
Vision	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:57:14 -0500
Re: Are we Exempt?	James, Chris	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:26:12 -0000
Re: The use of Bismuth	David Suraski	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:19:56 -0500
Re: Are we Exempt?	Bev Christian	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:09:37 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Mike Fenner	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:05:42 -0000
Re: Are we Exempt?	James, Chris	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:45:21 -0000
Re: Are we Exempt?	Daan Terstegge	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:27:47 +0100
Re: IPC-1066 question: Lead content in steel and Aluminum	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:37:52 -0000
Re: The use of Bismuth	Kay Nimmo	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:32:35 -0000
Re: IPC-1066 question: Lead content in steel and Aluminum	James, Chris	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:08:50 -0000
Re: Are we Exempt?	James, Chris	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:05:18 -0000
Re: The use of Bismuth	Werner Engelmaier	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:16:36 EST
Re: The use of Bismuth	Jack Sherman	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:48:16 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Lee Parker	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:28:55 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:57:38 EST
Are we Exempt?	Ken Patel	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:26:39 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Wesenberg, Raisa	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:23:21 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Bev Christian	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:17:53 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Genny Gibbard	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:07:10 -0600
Re: Tin Whiskers	Genny Gibbard	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:32:45 -0600
Re: Tin Whiskers	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:20:32 -0700
Tin Whiskers	Jose A. Hernandez	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:00:08 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Bev Christian	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:10:27 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:54:36 -0700
Re: The use of Bismuth	David D. Hillman	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:32:41 -0600
Re: The use of Bismuth	Jack Sherman	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:11:05 -0800
IPC-1066 question: Lead content in steel and Aluminum	Ken Patel	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:05:16 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	Jack Sherman	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:57:17 -0800
HF (halogen free) identification label	Ken Patel	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:28:56 -0800
Re: The use of Bismuth	John Barnes	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:15:21 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Richard Schumacher	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:03:17 -0600
Re: The use of Bismuth	Pratap Singh	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:56:31 -0600
Re: The use of Bismuth	Genny Gibbard	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:55:08 -0600
Re: The use of Bismuth	Carroll, George	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:46:15 -0500
Re: The use of Bismuth	Daan Terstegge	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:45:15 +0100
Re: The use of Bismuth	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:29:31 -0700
Re: [spam] [LF] The use of Bismuth	Mike Anderson	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:28:36 -0500
The use of Bismuth	Genny Gibbard	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:15:05 -0600
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Kay Nimmo	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:28:23 -0000
[SPAM] Re: [LF] Exemption for military products ?	Daan Terstegge	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:14:45 +0100
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:09:29 -0600
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:48:15 -0600
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:17:47 -0600
Re: RESEND: [LF] Marking/Labeling requirement for LF product s	Ken Patel	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:22:31 -0800
RESEND: [LF] Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Romm, Doug	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:38:01 -0600
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Romm, Doug	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:35:43 -0600
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Ken Patel	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:22:45 -0800
Re: Exemption for military products ?	Pratap Singh	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:54:20 -0600
Re: Exemptions based on amount of lead	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:11:11 -0600
Re: Exemption for military products ?	Daan Terstegge	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:47:04 +0100
Exemptions based on amount of lead	Carl R Ray	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:21:01 -0600
Re: Exemption for military products ?	Linda Zellars	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:17:55 -0500
Re: Exemption for military products ?	Bev Christian	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:12:14 -0500
Exemption for military products ?	Daan Terstegge	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:43:48 +0100
John Quick/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office.	John Quick	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:17:03 -0500
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Kay Nimmo	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:15:45 -0000
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Ron Fonsaer	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:01:46 +0100
Re: Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Romm, Doug	Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:06:02 -0600
Marking/Labeling requirement for LF products	Ken Patel	Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:27:24 -0800
Re: RoHS new exemption consultation	Temkin, Gregg	Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:32:28 -0800

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

LEADFREE Archives

January 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Subject

From

Date