LEADFREE Archives

January 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hal Winslow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:23:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
A general question (or more accurately fear) came up in a recent
discussion, and the scenario was as follows:

 

Even though an OEM company might be exempt from RoHS compliance
(specifically using lead free solder) most companies will have to
comply, so the marketplace will switch to predominantly SAC solder
assembly.  This would reduce the number of contract assemblers and
solder suppliers who still offered "normal" tin lead solder assembly,
and we would face a defacto forced conversion to lead free.

 

In general, would you expect this "doomsday" scenario to come to pass?
Or will there still be enough markets allowing 63/37 type assembly that
if one chooses they could remain with our old favorite assembly method?

 

Thanks,

Hal


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2