LISTSERV - LEADFREE Archives - LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

LEADFREE Archives

May 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	LEADFREE Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:

Subject	From	Date
Re: Put On The Market Clarification Saga	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 31 May 2006 22:50:30 -0500
IPCWorks CFP 2006	IPC Mail	Wed, 31 May 2006 10:42:07 -0500
Re: Question of Scope	Paul Chinery	Wed, 31 May 2006 16:26:59 +0100
Question of Scope	Nic Bowker	Wed, 31 May 2006 15:38:57 +0100
Re: Articles on lead free solders and RoHS	Abbott, Don	Wed, 31 May 2006 09:49:55 -0400
Out of office auto reply	Frank Kriesch	Wed, 31 May 2006 15:02:28 +0200
Re: NTC RE: TAC committee for RoHS	Stadem, Richard D.	Wed, 31 May 2006 06:45:56 -0500
Re: NTC RE: TAC committee for RoHS	Harvey Miller	Tue, 30 May 2006 23:01:00 -0700
NTC RE: TAC committee for RoHS	John Burke	Tue, 30 May 2006 22:48:51 -0700
TAC committee for RoHS	John Burke	Tue, 30 May 2006 21:57:33 -0700
Re: Reball or not to reball	Russ Winslow	Tue, 30 May 2006 15:05:04 -0700
Re: Put On The Market Clarification Saga	Trevor Chainey	Tue, 30 May 2006 13:17:06 +0100
Re: Articles on lead free solders and RoHS	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 30 May 2006 00:36:30 -0500
Re: Articles on lead free solders and RoHS	John Burke	Mon, 29 May 2006 20:09:01 -0700
Re: SnPb in SAC wave.	Mumtaz Bora	Mon, 29 May 2006 19:22:26 -0700
Articles on lead free solders and RoHS	John Burke	Mon, 29 May 2006 19:16:25 -0700
Antw: [LF] Articles on lead free solders and RoHS (Out of office)	Guenter Grossmann	Tue, 30 May 2006 04:16:23 +0200
Re: CONGRATULATIONS JOHN	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 29 May 2006 02:30:01 -0500
Listserv service interruption Friday May 26th	Keach Sasamori	Fri, 26 May 2006 16:06:34 -0500
Re: Symbols for RoHS and WEEE Parts' Compliance	Michael Kirschner	Fri, 26 May 2006 09:48:08 -0500
Re: Component Segregation	Quintin Larson	Fri, 26 May 2006 09:27:44 -0500
Yun Zhang/Americas/PWBChemistry/Cookson is out of the office.	Yun Zhang	Fri, 26 May 2006 07:36:45 -0400
Component Segregation	Kane, Amol (349)	Fri, 26 May 2006 07:10:33 -0400
TAC decisions and lead in solders	John Burke	Thu, 25 May 2006 23:15:51 -0700
Re: URGENT	MA/NY DDave	Fri, 26 May 2006 00:13:52 -0500
Listserv service interruption Friday May 26th	Keach Sasamori	Thu, 25 May 2006 23:47:10 -0500
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 25 May 2006 23:42:06 -0500
Re: Symbols for RoHS and WEEE Parts' Compliance	Tom Parkinson	Thu, 25 May 2006 15:00:39 -0400
Re: Symbols for RoHS and WEEE Parts' Compliance	David Shaff	Thu, 25 May 2006 11:31:48 -0700
Re: DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	Jayasinghe, Ryan	Thu, 25 May 2006 11:16:55 -0700
NTC-PUN	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 25 May 2006 10:59:49 -0700
Re: DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	John Burke	Thu, 25 May 2006 09:47:20 -0700
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	John R. Sieber	Thu, 25 May 2006 12:07:12 -0400
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	Bev Christian	Thu, 25 May 2006 11:06:46 -0400
Re: DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	to Paul Taylor	Thu, 25 May 2006 14:08:28 +0100
Re: DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	James, Chris	Thu, 25 May 2006 11:48:03 +0100
Re: DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	Ajay Moghe	Thu, 25 May 2006 15:55:43 +0530
Re: DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	James, Chris	Thu, 25 May 2006 09:51:06 +0100
Re: URGENT	James, Chris	Thu, 25 May 2006 09:44:16 +0100
Re: Reball or not to reball	Fox, Ian	Thu, 25 May 2006 08:10:33 +0100
Re: URGENT	John Burke	Wed, 24 May 2006 22:10:57 -0700
NTC Exemptions applications and some fun	John Burke	Wed, 24 May 2006 21:31:01 -0700
URGENT	John Burke	Wed, 24 May 2006 21:16:01 -0700
DTi material on WEEE and ROHS Directives	John Burke	Wed, 24 May 2006 13:49:12 -0700
Re: Reball or not to reball	Stadem, Richard D.	Wed, 24 May 2006 12:51:49 -0500
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	John R. Sieber	Wed, 24 May 2006 13:44:31 -0400
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	Bev Christian	Wed, 24 May 2006 13:05:39 -0400
Re: Reball or not to reball	Cosentino, Tony	Wed, 24 May 2006 10:42:57 -0500
Re: Reball or not to reball	Anderson, Richard	Wed, 24 May 2006 11:41:25 -0400
FW: NEW exemption request under ENV:Directive 2002/95 EC Article 5(1)(b)	John Burke	Wed, 24 May 2006 07:53:22 -0700
Re: NEW exemption request under ENV:Directive 2002/95 EC Article 5(1)(b)	John Burke	Wed, 24 May 2006 07:49:25 -0700
Upcoming IPC Events on RoHS and Materials Declaration	Tina Nerad	Wed, 24 May 2006 09:31:06 -0500
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	John R. Sieber	Wed, 24 May 2006 10:13:27 -0400
Re: Reball or not to reball	ALLEN, LOA	Wed, 24 May 2006 07:04:00 -0700
Re: RoHS Enforcers Guidance version 1.0	James, Chris	Wed, 24 May 2006 14:34:07 +0100
Re: Reball or not to reball	McGee, Mike (MN51)	Wed, 24 May 2006 08:23:45 -0500
Re: Reball or not to reball	Bev Christian	Wed, 24 May 2006 09:09:11 -0400
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	Bev Christian	Wed, 24 May 2006 09:07:00 -0400
Re: RoHS Enforcers Guidance version 1.0	Tempea, Ioan	Wed, 24 May 2006 08:48:40 -0400
RoHS Enforcers Guidance version 1.0	Allen Ferry	Wed, 24 May 2006 13:46:07 +0100
Recall: RoHS Enforcers Guidance version 1.0	Allen Ferry	Wed, 24 May 2006 13:45:31 +0100
RoHS Enforcers Guidance version 1.0	Allen Ferry	Wed, 24 May 2006 13:44:52 +0100
Re: Reball or not to reball	Meschter, Stephan J (US SSA)	Wed, 24 May 2006 08:27:55 -0400
Re: Reball or not to reball	Anslow, Phillip	Wed, 24 May 2006 10:32:59 +0100
Re: PBB/PBDE GCMS calibration standards - Question	Clavius Chin	Wed, 24 May 2006 10:58:11 +0700
Re: NTC RE: [LF] RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Tue, 23 May 2006 16:50:16 -0700
NTC I month later and the Hitch Hikers Guide	John Burke	Tue, 23 May 2006 16:45:21 -0700
Re: NTC RE: [LF] RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Tue, 23 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
IPC/JEDEC Materials Declaration Conference in Rosemont, IL on June 6-7, 2006	Tina Nerad	Tue, 23 May 2006 16:19:23 -0500
Re: NTC RE: [LF] RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Stadem, Richard D.	Tue, 23 May 2006 15:22:16 -0500
NTC RE: [LF] RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Tue, 23 May 2006 12:47:23 -0700
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Sem, Robert K	Tue, 23 May 2006 12:02:28 -0700
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Tue, 23 May 2006 11:44:51 -0700
Re: Back to square one	John Burke	Tue, 23 May 2006 11:22:15 -0700
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Bev Christian	Tue, 23 May 2006 13:19:31 -0400
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Shawn Vike	Tue, 23 May 2006 10:22:34 -0600
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Charles Dolci	Tue, 23 May 2006 09:06:14 -0700
Re: RoHS & WEEE Summary	Genny Gibbard	Tue, 23 May 2006 10:02:17 -0600
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Bev Christian	Tue, 23 May 2006 11:56:18 -0400
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Taylor	Tue, 23 May 2006 09:18:28 -0600
Re: Back to square one	John Burke	Tue, 23 May 2006 07:55:15 -0700
Re: Back to square one	Wrobel, Clayton	Tue, 23 May 2006 09:33:52 -0400
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Kane, Amol (349)	Tue, 23 May 2006 06:58:56 -0400
FW: RoHS enforcers Guidance	James, Chris	Tue, 23 May 2006 10:21:53 +0100
RoHS & WEEE Summary	Paul Jackson	Tue, 23 May 2006 10:15:21 +0100
Re: Back to square one	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 22 May 2006 23:11:48 -0500
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Ajay Moghe	Tue, 23 May 2006 09:41:18 +0530
Re: Back to square one	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 22 May 2006 23:02:17 -0500
Re: Back to square one	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 23:48:13 EDT
Re: Back to square one	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 22 May 2006 22:47:19 -0500
Re: Back to square one	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 22 May 2006 22:35:02 -0500
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 22 May 2006 22:09:02 -0500
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Mon, 22 May 2006 18:43:27 -0500
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Mon, 22 May 2006 16:15:24 -0700
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Mon, 22 May 2006 17:56:29 -0500
Re: RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Mon, 22 May 2006 14:47:19 -0700
Tin additives - was Re: [LF] Back to square one	Camille Good	Mon, 22 May 2006 14:09:22 -0700
RoHS & Cadmium - was Re: [LF] Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Camille Good	Mon, 22 May 2006 13:30:45 -0700
Re: Reball or not to reball	ALLEN, LOA	Mon, 22 May 2006 12:57:01 -0700
Re: Back to square one	Pete Houwen	Mon, 22 May 2006 12:23:59 -0500
Re: Reball or not to reball	John Burke	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:45:08 -0700
Re: Back to square one	John Burke	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:40:26 -0700
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	James, Chris	Mon, 22 May 2006 17:26:17 +0100
Reball or not to reball	Loa	Mon, 22 May 2006 11:22:08 -0500
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Steve Gregory	Mon, 22 May 2006 11:16:59 -0500
Out of the office.	Rick Row	Mon, 22 May 2006 08:55:32 PDT
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	James, Chris	Mon, 22 May 2006 16:45:28 +0100
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Steve Gregory	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:38:26 -0500
Re: Back to square one	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 22 May 2006 08:29:32 -0700
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:59:33 EDT
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Brian Ellis	Mon, 22 May 2006 17:42:37 +0300
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:30:36 EDT
Re: Back to square one	Joe Fjelstad	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:30:25 EDT
Re: Back to square one	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:29:13 EDT
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Stadem, Richard D.	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:27:37 -0500
Re: Back to square one	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:24:17 EDT
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Pete Houwen	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:22:29 -0500
Re: NTC - Beijing Cough	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:21:39 EDT
Re: Back to square one	Steve Gregory	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:03:00 -0500
Re: Back to square one	Phil Nutting	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:00:28 -0400
NTC - Beijing Cough	Michael Kirschner	Mon, 22 May 2006 21:43:54 +0800
Re: Back to square one	Pete Houwen	Mon, 22 May 2006 08:35:07 -0500
Re: Back to square one	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 08:28:45 EDT
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 22 May 2006 07:35:50 EDT
Re: Back to square one	<>	Mon, 22 May 2006 06:52:37 EDT
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	SCHMIDT, WOLF-DIETER - PFHO	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:03:08 +0200
Antw: Re: [LF] Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Guenter Grossmann	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:42:03 +0200
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:33 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Brian Ellis	Mon, 22 May 2006 10:00:03 +0300
Back to square one	Joe Fjelstad	Mon, 22 May 2006 01:09:23 EDT
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Sun, 21 May 2006 21:33:13 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:17:19 +0800
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Sun, 21 May 2006 18:13:40 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Mon, 22 May 2006 09:08:52 +0800
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Sun, 21 May 2006 16:21:16 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Mon, 22 May 2006 06:19:15 +0800
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Sun, 21 May 2006 11:40:44 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Sun, 21 May 2006 21:07:51 +0800
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Brian Ellis	Sun, 21 May 2006 11:26:31 +0300
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Sat, 20 May 2006 23:20:49 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Sun, 21 May 2006 10:00:42 +0800
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Sat, 20 May 2006 18:51:50 -0700
NEW exemption request under ENV:Directive 2002/95 EC Article 5(1)(b)	John Burke	Sat, 20 May 2006 18:23:36 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Sat, 20 May 2006 20:21:37 -0500
NEW exemption request under ENV:Directive 2002/95 EC Article 5(1)(b)	John Burke	Sat, 20 May 2006 18:08:20 -0700
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Michael Kirschner	Sat, 20 May 2006 19:48:03 -0500
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Brian Ellis	Sat, 20 May 2006 10:17:06 +0300
Good evening I have some good news	John Burke	Sat, 20 May 2006 00:10:06 -0700
Chris BALL/AuburnHills/VSDS/VALEO is out of the office.	Chris Ball	Fri, 19 May 2006 20:35:26 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Joe Fjelstad	Fri, 19 May 2006 17:02:25 -0400
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Joe Fjelstad	Fri, 19 May 2006 16:52:10 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	John Burke	Fri, 19 May 2006 13:44:35 -0700
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Bev Christian	Fri, 19 May 2006 16:24:31 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Arnold Offner	Fri, 19 May 2006 16:21:19 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question NTC	Bev Christian	Fri, 19 May 2006 15:30:17 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	John R. Sieber	Fri, 19 May 2006 15:10:40 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Bev Christian	Fri, 19 May 2006 14:33:58 -0400
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Fri, 19 May 2006 11:12:16 -0700
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 19 May 2006 14:12:09 -0400
Re: Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	John Burke	Fri, 19 May 2006 10:55:42 -0700
Ray Franklin's defense of RoHS	Davy, Gordon	Fri, 19 May 2006 13:39:42 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	John R. Sieber	Fri, 19 May 2006 12:48:23 -0400
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	John Burke	Fri, 19 May 2006 09:24:31 -0700
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	Oliver Betz	Fri, 19 May 2006 10:09:52 +0200
Re: NTC some other serious "exploitation" issues	Karl Sauter	Thu, 18 May 2006 16:12:36 -0700
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Brian Epstein	Thu, 18 May 2006 15:12:09 -0700
IPC 4th International Conference on Flexible Circuits and Chip Scale Packaging	Tina Nerad	Thu, 18 May 2006 16:47:09 -0500
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	John Burke	Thu, 18 May 2006 13:25:12 -0700
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	Steve Mikell	Fri, 19 May 2006 02:43:19 +0700
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Bev Christian	Thu, 18 May 2006 15:38:20 -0400
Re: Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Davy, Gordon	Thu, 18 May 2006 15:33:32 -0400
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	David Suraski	Thu, 18 May 2006 13:25:32 -0400
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	David Suraski	Thu, 18 May 2006 13:21:45 -0400
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Some Interesting News on Exemptions	John Burke	Thu, 18 May 2006 08:46:42 -0700
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	John Burke	Thu, 18 May 2006 08:44:51 -0700
Re: NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	James, Chris	Thu, 18 May 2006 16:17:32 +0100
Re: NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	Brian Ellis	Thu, 18 May 2006 18:06:50 +0300
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Some Interesting News on Exemptions	Nic Bowker	Thu, 18 May 2006 16:02:54 +0100
Re: NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	John Burke	Thu, 18 May 2006 07:53:10 -0700
Re: Antw: Re: [LF] Some Interesting News on Exemptions	John Burke	Thu, 18 May 2006 07:50:21 -0700
Re: NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	John Burke	Thu, 18 May 2006 07:45:27 -0700
Re: SnPb in SAC wave.	Kane, Amol (349)	Thu, 18 May 2006 10:31:09 -0400
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	Brian Ellis	Thu, 18 May 2006 16:48:13 +0300
Antw: Re: [LF] Some Interesting News on Exemptions	Guenter Grossmann	Thu, 18 May 2006 15:39:17 +0200
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	DeGenova, Jon R.	Thu, 18 May 2006 08:49:55 -0400
FW: SAC solder properties database published	James, Chris	Thu, 18 May 2006 12:05:34 +0100
Re: Exemption Reconsideration	to Paul Taylor	Thu, 18 May 2006 10:39:35 +0100
Re: Some Interesting News on Exemptions	to Paul Taylor	Thu, 18 May 2006 10:37:10 +0100
Some Interesting News on Exemptions	Nic Bowker	Thu, 18 May 2006 10:06:44 +0100
Re: NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	James, Chris	Thu, 18 May 2006 09:26:17 +0100
Re: NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	Brian Ellis	Thu, 18 May 2006 10:01:54 +0300
NTC Europen based Environmental agency taken to court over environmental damage - and lost the case......	John Burke	Wed, 17 May 2006 16:46:34 -0700
Cr(VI) Analysis - I have a question	Bev Christian	Wed, 17 May 2006 16:33:15 -0400
Exemption Reconsideration	Jerome Wagner	Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:13 -0400
IPC/JEDEC First International Conference on Materials Declaration in Rosemont, IL on 6/6-7	Tina Nerad	Wed, 17 May 2006 09:54:00 -0500
Re: SnPb in SAC wave.	John Barnes	Wed, 17 May 2006 10:52:09 -0400
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	<>	Wed, 17 May 2006 10:40:08 EDT
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	<>	Wed, 17 May 2006 10:35:09 EDT
Re: SnPb in SAC wave.	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 17 May 2006 08:59:01 -0500
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	Phil Nutting	Wed, 17 May 2006 08:30:15 -0400
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	Reuven ROKAH	Wed, 17 May 2006 15:27:26 +0300
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	Phil Nutting	Wed, 17 May 2006 08:10:20 -0400
Re: [TN] Question about ENIG and other surface finishing	John Burke	Tue, 16 May 2006 23:27:20 -0700
Re: [TN] Question about ENIG and other surface finishing	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 16 May 2006 23:46:19 -0500
Re: SnPb in SAC wave.	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 16 May 2006 23:26:59 -0500
Re: SN100C vs SAC305	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 16 May 2006 22:41:51 -0500
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Joe Fjelstad	Tue, 16 May 2006 16:47:55 EDT
Call For Papers 2007	IPC Mail	Tue, 16 May 2006 15:41:27 -0500
IPC Workshops "Ensuring RoHS Compliance through Materials Declaration Tools" in San Francisco, CA and Seattle, WA	Tina Nerad	Tue, 16 May 2006 14:12:56 -0500
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Charles Dolci	Tue, 16 May 2006 11:30:09 -0700
SN100C vs SAC305	Dominic Boudreau	Tue, 16 May 2006 14:20:11 -0400
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Tue, 16 May 2006 10:11:09 -0700
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Tue, 16 May 2006 10:08:18 -0700
Re: [TN] Question about ENIG and other surface finishing	Werner Engelmaier	Tue, 16 May 2006 13:05:24 EDT
Re: [TN] Question about ENIG and other surface finishing	John Parsons	Tue, 16 May 2006 09:46:19 -0700
Latest updates on RoHS round 5 exemptions and US postal stamps	John Burke	Tue, 16 May 2006 09:33:36 -0700
SnPb in SAC wave.	No Name	Tue, 16 May 2006 08:35:11 -0700
5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Mon, 15 May 2006 18:28:10 -0700
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Brian Epstein	Mon, 15 May 2006 16:23:57 -0700
Register now for How to Launch Your IPC-1752 Materials Declaration Program Workshop in Tampa, FL or Chelmsford, MA	Tina Nerad	Mon, 15 May 2006 15:59:27 -0500
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Joe Fjelstad	Mon, 15 May 2006 11:25:46 EDT
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Steve Gregory	Mon, 15 May 2006 10:05:26 -0500
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Oliver Betz	Mon, 15 May 2006 16:23:23 +0200
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Joe Fjelstad	Sun, 14 May 2006 13:51:37 EDT
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Charles Dolci	Sun, 14 May 2006 08:03:06 -0700
Re: Question about ENIG in SnPb process . . . .	Dave Delman (MA/NY DDave	Sun, 14 May 2006 03:38:48 -0500
NTC Press release link on round 5 exemptions notification for inputs for RoHS	John Burke	Sat, 13 May 2006 19:56:45 -0700
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Sat, 13 May 2006 17:10:38 -0700
NTC...Off topic reading	Joe Fjelstad	Sat, 13 May 2006 18:03:47 EDT
Re: SWATCH article	Joe Fjelstad	Sat, 13 May 2006 13:39:36 EDT
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	Stadem, Richard D.	Sat, 13 May 2006 08:16:18 -0500
Re: SWATCH article	MA/NY DDave	Sat, 13 May 2006 02:57:34 -0500
Re: some other serious "exploitation" issues	MA/NY DDave	Sat, 13 May 2006 02:34:41 -0500
Re: SWATCH article	John Burke	Sat, 13 May 2006 00:23:14 -0700
Re: SWATCH article	MA/NY DDave	Sat, 13 May 2006 02:11:15 -0500
A Swiss watch tale for a Friday.	John Burke	Fri, 12 May 2006 17:49:12 -0700
some other serious "exploitation" issues	Brian Epstein	Fri, 12 May 2006 15:58:24 -0700
IPC RoHS/Materials Declaration webcast series	Tina Nerad	Fri, 12 May 2006 14:02:11 -0500
SWATCH article	John Burke	Fri, 12 May 2006 10:27:19 -0700
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Fri, 12 May 2006 09:23:30 -0700
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Fri, 12 May 2006 09:15:35 -0700
Re: Pb-free Assembly Audit check list	Mike Taylor	Fri, 12 May 2006 08:21:54 -0600
Re: Pb-free Assembly Audit check list	George Carroll	Fri, 12 May 2006 08:51:51 -0400
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Otto de Smit	Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:39 +0100
Re: CONGRATULATIONS JOHN	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 11 May 2006 23:56:53 -0500
Re: Tin whisker position and China translation	Dave Delman (MA/NY DDave	Thu, 11 May 2006 23:45:29 -0500
Re: Pb-free Assembly Audit check list	Ajay Moghe	Fri, 12 May 2006 09:22:27 +0530
Question about ENIG in SnPb process . . . .	Camille Good	Thu, 11 May 2006 17:27:31 -0700
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 16:20:22 -0700
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Smith, Rick	Thu, 11 May 2006 17:35:02 -0500
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 14:58:37 -0700
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 14:56:19 -0700
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Steve Gregory	Thu, 11 May 2006 16:54:12 -0500
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 14:23:26 -0700
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 14:15:34 -0700
Re: Tin whisker position and China translation	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 11 May 2006 12:21:10 -0700
Re: CONGRATULATIONS JOHN	Joe Fjelstad	Thu, 11 May 2006 15:10:04 EDT
Re: CONGRATULATIONS JOHN	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 11:40:04 -0700
Re: Tin whisker position and China translation	Joe Fjelstad	Thu, 11 May 2006 13:41:44 EDT
Re: Tin whisker position and China translation	Stadem, Richard D.	Thu, 11 May 2006 12:30:41 -0500
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 11 May 2006 09:47:41 -0700
Re: Tin whisker position and China translation	Joe Fjelstad	Thu, 11 May 2006 12:24:34 EDT
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 11 May 2006 12:24:27 EDT
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:07 -0700
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 11 May 2006 09:03:33 -0700
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Smith, Rick	Thu, 11 May 2006 10:53:03 -0500
CONGRATULATIONS JOHN	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 11 May 2006 11:37:21 EDT
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Allen Ferry	Thu, 11 May 2006 16:32:10 +0100
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 11 May 2006 11:30:33 EDT
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Brian Ellis	Thu, 11 May 2006 17:56:51 +0300
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:43 -0700
Pb-free Assembly Audit check list	Richard Kraszewski	Thu, 11 May 2006 09:21:27 -0500
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Thu, 11 May 2006 06:33:33 -0700
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Allen Ferry	Thu, 11 May 2006 14:16:34 +0100
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Steve Gregory	Thu, 11 May 2006 07:18:42 -0500
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	Allen Ferry	Thu, 11 May 2006 10:41:30 +0100
Re: reliability data on lead free real life scenario	Brian Ellis	Thu, 11 May 2006 12:24:26 +0300
Re: 5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 01:21:07 -0700
5th Stakeholder consultation	John Burke	Thu, 11 May 2006 01:08:48 -0700
Ro	John Burke	Wed, 10 May 2006 23:01:59 -0700
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Michael Kirschner	Wed, 10 May 2006 23:56:39 -0500
Re: Tin whisker position and China translation	Dave Delman (MA/NY DDave	Wed, 10 May 2006 23:23:26 -0500
Re: country wise viewpoints	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 10 May 2006 23:02:28 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 10 May 2006 22:48:45 -0500
reliability data on lead free real life scenario	John Burke	Wed, 10 May 2006 16:47:26 -0700
Re: Marking and identification pcb	Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)	Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:21 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	John Burke	Wed, 10 May 2006 09:20:34 -0700
NTC RE: [LF] FW: WEE lines	John Burke	Wed, 10 May 2006 09:14:41 -0700
Re: Marking and identification pcb	Gary Camac	Wed, 10 May 2006 10:42:59 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Smith, Rick	Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:09 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Oliver Betz	Wed, 10 May 2006 15:25:04 +0200
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Stadem, Richard D.	Wed, 10 May 2006 07:41:59 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Lee parker	Wed, 10 May 2006 08:15:39 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	James, Chris	Wed, 10 May 2006 13:06:45 +0100
Re: Cost pressures starting!	James, Chris	Wed, 10 May 2006 12:45:11 +0100
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Stadem, Richard D.	Wed, 10 May 2006 06:33:32 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	James, Chris	Wed, 10 May 2006 09:21:32 +0100
Re: Cost pressures starting!	James, Chris	Wed, 10 May 2006 09:18:43 +0100
Tin whisker position and China translation	John Burke	Wed, 10 May 2006 01:02:11 -0700
FW: WEE lines	James, Chris	Wed, 10 May 2006 09:00:15 +0100
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Werner Engelmaier	Tue, 9 May 2006 19:10:20 EDT
IPC/JEDEC International Conference on Materials Declaration-June 6-7, 2006, Rosemont, IL	Tina Nerad	Tue, 9 May 2006 16:34:38 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Stadem, Richard D.	Tue, 9 May 2006 16:28:37 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Stadem, Richard D.	Tue, 9 May 2006 16:26:19 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Werner Engelmaier	Tue, 9 May 2006 17:17:22 EDT
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Werner Engelmaier	Tue, 9 May 2006 17:00:54 EDT
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Mike Buetow	Tue, 9 May 2006 16:55:27 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Mike Buetow	Tue, 9 May 2006 16:41:38 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	John Burke	Tue, 9 May 2006 12:59:31 -0700
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Pete Houwen	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:30:40 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Lester Subrattee	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:47:07 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Tempea, Ioan	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:46:56 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	DeGenova, Jon R.	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:41:54 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Phil Nutting	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:24:35 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Smith, Rick	Tue, 9 May 2006 13:15:36 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	John Burke	Tue, 9 May 2006 10:31:46 -0700
Re: Cost pressures starting!	John Burke	Tue, 9 May 2006 10:31:03 -0700
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Stadem, Richard D.	Tue, 9 May 2006 12:26:12 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	DeGenova, Jon R.	Tue, 9 May 2006 13:11:02 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Tempea, Ioan	Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:20 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Joe Fjelstad	Tue, 9 May 2006 12:27:40 EDT
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Steve Gregory	Tue, 9 May 2006 11:08:40 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Stadem, Richard D.	Tue, 9 May 2006 10:50:26 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Smith, Rick	Tue, 9 May 2006 10:17:43 -0500
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Lee parker	Tue, 9 May 2006 11:01:35 -0400
Re: Cost pressures starting!	Werner Engelmaier	Tue, 9 May 2006 10:37:26 EDT
Cost pressures starting!	Pete Houwen	Tue, 9 May 2006 09:11:33 -0500
Re: DTi website	James, Chris	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:53:13 +0100
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Clif Brick	Tue, 9 May 2006 09:44:29 -0400
Re: DTi website	Nic Bowker	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:19:07 +0100
Re: DTi website	James, Chris	Tue, 9 May 2006 12:29:23 +0100
Po Tse/ANR/MS/PHILIPS is out of the office.	Po Tse	Tue, 9 May 2006 05:13:50 -0400
DTi website	James, Chris	Tue, 9 May 2006 08:55:56 +0100
Out of office auto reply	Frank Kriesch	Tue, 9 May 2006 08:56:18 +0200
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 9 May 2006 00:12:27 -0500
100000 hits at Push back - thanks to all	John Burke	Mon, 8 May 2006 20:53:37 -0700
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	<>	Mon, 8 May 2006 19:33:11 EDT
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	John Burke	Mon, 8 May 2006 16:27:40 -0700
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Matthias Mansfeld	Mon, 8 May 2006 23:15:21 +0200
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Charles Dolci	Mon, 8 May 2006 14:13:59 -0700
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	John Burke	Mon, 8 May 2006 14:04:33 -0700
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Clif Brick	Mon, 8 May 2006 16:16:09 -0400
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Charles Dolci	Mon, 8 May 2006 08:24:33 -0700
Re: Intrusive Reflow	Bev Christian	Mon, 8 May 2006 09:08:49 -0400
Intrusive Reflow	Yannick Brisson	Mon, 8 May 2006 08:55:12 -0400
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Ajay Moghe	Sat, 6 May 2006 11:46:38 +0530
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	John Burke	Fri, 5 May 2006 20:57:40 -0700
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Dave Delman (MA/NY DDave	Fri, 5 May 2006 22:28:22 -0500
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	John Burke	Fri, 5 May 2006 14:03:30 -0700
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	Charles Dolci	Fri, 5 May 2006 11:27:35 -0700
Re: NTC It's Friday somewhere in the World - good morning...	Joe Fjelstad	Fri, 5 May 2006 10:35:08 EDT
NTC It's Friday somewhere in the World - good morning...	John Burke	Fri, 5 May 2006 00:33:02 -0700
Countdown timer for RoHS and competition	John Burke	Thu, 4 May 2006 09:55:11 -0700
Re: Pushback blog site up and running	John Burke	Thu, 4 May 2006 09:00:59 -0700
country wise viewpoints	Ajay Moghe	Thu, 4 May 2006 09:38:14 +0530
Re: NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 3 May 2006 22:27:48 -0500
Re: Shuttle launch and tin whiskers!	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 3 May 2006 12:44:20 -0500
Re: FW: Lead in solders replacements - environmental impact - letter to the commissioner	Oliver Betz	Wed, 3 May 2006 18:59:44 +0200
Re: China-NTC	John Burke	Wed, 3 May 2006 09:20:36 -0700
Re: Shelf life of circuit board plating	Werner Engelmaier	Wed, 3 May 2006 12:20:01 EDT
China-NTC	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Wed, 3 May 2006 09:06:16 -0700
Re: Could Tin Disease Be An Underlying Cause Of Tin Whiskers?	Leo Higgins	Wed, 3 May 2006 08:41:29 -0700
Re: Could Tin Disease Be An Underlying Cause Of Tin Whiskers?	John Barnes	Wed, 3 May 2006 10:44:17 -0400
Re: Could Tin Disease Be An Underlying Cause Of Tin Whiskers?	Hilty, Robert D	Wed, 3 May 2006 08:33:09 -0400
Re: Could Tin Disease Be An Underlying Cause Of Tin Whiskers?	Bev Christian	Wed, 3 May 2006 08:29:17 -0400
Re: Shuttle launch and tin whiskers!	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 2 May 2006 23:30:32 -0500
Re: Could Tin Disease Be An Underlying Cause Of Tin Whiskers?	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 2 May 2006 22:36:44 -0500
Could Tin Disease Be An Underlying Cause Of Tin Whiskers?	Robert J. Lang	Tue, 2 May 2006 23:01:46 -0400
Shuttle launch and tin whiskers!	David Douthit	Tue, 2 May 2006 18:46:33 -0700
Pushback blog site up and running	John Burke	Tue, 2 May 2006 18:34:53 -0700
FW: Lead in solders replacements - environmental impact - letter to the commissioner	John Burke	Tue, 2 May 2006 11:27:07 -0700
NTC BUT- Tin industry appears to have some serious supply chain exploitation issues	John Burke	Tue, 2 May 2006 11:06:05 -0700
Will the government take the risk?	Otto de Smit	Tue, 2 May 2006 16:03:55 +0100
Re: Shelf life of circuit board plating	SCHMIDT, WOLF-DIETER - PFHO	Tue, 2 May 2006 09:06:22 +0200
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 1 May 2006 13:37:43 EDT
China and Korean RoHS documents	John Burke	Mon, 1 May 2006 09:22:08 -0700
Exemption possibilities for lead in solders on environmental grounds	John Burke	Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:57:22 -0700
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 1 May 2006 01:09:47 -0500
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 1 May 2006 00:52:43 -0500
Re: Is lead removal really necessary in solders?	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 1 May 2006 00:41:36 -0500
Yun Zhang/Americas/PWBChemistry/Cookson is out of the office.	Yun Zhang	Mon, 1 May 2006 01:05:35 -0400

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

LEADFREE Archives

May 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Subject

From

Date