LISTSERV - LEADFREE Archives - LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

LEADFREE Archives

October 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	LEADFREE Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:

Subject	From	Date
Re: Recommended/Approved List of moisture Stable Connector Plastics for Lead Free	David Shaff	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:40:53 -0700
Recommended/Approved List of moisture Stable Connector Plastics for Lead Free	Mumtaz Bora	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:26:55 -0800
Re: Haloween	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:37:22 -0700
Haloween	John Burke	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:27:15 -0800
YF Yap/Dynacraft is out of the office.	YF Yap	Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:00:37 +0800
Re: WHAT A LOT OF WEEE	Davy, Gordon	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:33:46 -0500
News Release: EPA Announces An Estimated One Million Pounds of Household Hazardous Waste Collected	Arnold Offner	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:24:21 -0500
Re: WHAT A LOT OF WEEE	Arnold Offner	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:17:28 -0500
Re: WHAT A LOT OF WEEE	Davy, Gordon	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:15:32 -0500
WHAT A LOT OF WEEE	James, Chris	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:48:54 -0000
Re: EU requirement for record retention	Nic Bowker	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:42:24 -0000
Re: EU requirement for record retention	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:01:34 -0600
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Bev Christian	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:32:28 -0400
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Karl Sauter	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:13:24 -0700
Re: EU requirement for record retention	John R. Sieber	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:23:46 -0400
Re: EU requirement for record retention	MA/NY DDave	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:42:15 -0500
Re: EU requirement for record retention	MA/NY DDave	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:12:44 -0500
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Smith, Rick	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:05:22 -0500
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Douglas, Scott	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:32:27 -0400
Re: record retention	Kallin, Dan	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:00:08 -0400
Re:	James, Chris	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:16:01 +0100
Re:	James, Chris	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:12:39 +0100
Re:	Nic Bowker	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:48:49 +0100
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Dennis Bang	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:15:12 +1000
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Phil Nutting	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:29:38 -0400
Template contract language for WEEE & RoHS	Liston, Leah	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:29:04 -0400
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Romm, Doug	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:24:09 -0500
Re: Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Morse, Carrie	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:41:25 -0400
Making IC's RoHS Compliant	Douglas, Scott	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:38:20 -0400
Re: EU requirement for record retention	Anchondo, Dan	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:50:53 -0400
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Tom Braswell	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:12:39 -0400
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Tom Braswell	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:07:53 -0400
Re:	Mark Mayer	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:15:37 -0500
Re:	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:43:38 +0100
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:36:45 +0100
Re: Exemptions	Harvey Miller	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:53:17 -0700
Re: Exemptions	Harvey Miller	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:44:20 -0700
Re:	John R. Sieber	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:56:28 -0400
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:32:08 -0400
<No subject>	Jay Soderberg	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:13:15 -0500
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:10:24 +0100
Re: Exemptions	James, Chris	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:02:37 +0100
John Quick/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office.	John Quick	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:16:10 -0400
Re: Exemptions	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:30:26 -0500
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Joe Fjelstad	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:09:04 EDT
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Dennis Bang	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:58:24 +1000
Re: Exemptions	Dieffenbacher, William C (US SSA)	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:52:24 -0400
Exemptions	No Name	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:30:13 -0500
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	Alcorn, Brent	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:55:05 -0400
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	Alcorn, Brent	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:21:32 -0400
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	James, Chris	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:15:45 +0100
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Quintin Larson	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:59:16 -0500
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	John R. Sieber	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:56:36 -0400
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Harvey Miller	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:55:15 -0700
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Blair K. Hogg	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:54:15 -0700
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Harvey Miller	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:51:56 -0700
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	Greg Parke	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:47:12 -0400
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Arnold Offner	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:44:33 -0400
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Wenger, George M.	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:38:58 -0400
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Pascal Guiheneuf	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:34:42 +0200
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	James, Chris	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:34:23 +0100
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Michael McMonagle	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:32:41 -0500
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	Nic Bowker	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:27:57 +0100
Re: EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Harvey Miller	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:24:46 -0700
EC Approves Second Round of RoHS Exemption	Jackie TAYLOR	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:55:31 -0500
Re: WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	James, Chris	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:53:17 +0100
WEEE/RoHS implementation questions	Greg Parke	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:23:16 -0400
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Tom Braswell	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:36:00 -0400
Re: Screws RoHS Compliant ??	James, Chris	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:23:15 +0100
Re: 5/6 and 6/6 compliance reliability issues	Reuven ROKAH	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:48:50 +0200
Re: 5/6 and 6/6 compliance reliability issues	Ofer Cohen	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:40:15 +0200
Re: 5/6 and 6/6 compliance reliability issues	Yoav Gilad	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:44:29 +0200
5/6 and 6/6 compliance reliability issues	John Burke	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:49:27 -0700
Screws RoHS Compliant ??	Dennis Bang	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:44:33 +1000
Re: Vapor Phase Reflow Soldering vs. Convection Reflow Soldering	santhakumar rajesnayagham	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:07:52 -0700
Re: Vapor Phase Reflow Soldering vs. Convection Reflow Soldering	Brian Ellis	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:10:15 +0300
Re: Stock parts	Smith, Rick	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:53:04 -0500
More of the same...	Smith, Rick	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:43:15 -0500
Re: Vapor Phase Reflow Soldering vs. Convection Reflow Soldering	Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:39:18 -0400
Re: Vapor Phase Reflow Soldering vs. Convection Reflow Soldering	Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:33:39 -0400
Re: Ledafree solder Paste: SAC305 v/s SAC405	David Suraski	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:25:57 -0400
Stock parts	Genny Gibbard	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:18:05 -0600
Re: Ledafree solder Paste: SAC305 v/s SAC405	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:08:54 -0500
Vapor Phase Reflow Soldering vs. Convection Reflow Soldering	Malewicz Wesley	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:08:42 -0400
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	Anderson, Richard	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:22:56 -0400
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	MA/NY DDave	Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:43:41 -0500
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	No Name	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:00:38 -0500
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	Werner Engelmaier	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:16:24 EDT
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	Werner Engelmaier	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:05:48 EDT
UK RoHS legislation published	Steve Lawrence	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:30:51 +0100
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	James, Chris	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:27:44 +0100
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	Adeline KO	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:57:20 +0800
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	James, Chris	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:10:43 +0100
Re: Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	Lee parker	Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:30:32 -0400
Brd finishing Immersion Gold with BGA. Had black spot issue	Adeline KO	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:11:40 +0800
Re: Lead-free Processing Temp Requirements	John Barnes	Thu, 20 Oct 2005 06:29:27 -0400
Re: Lead-free Processing Temp Requirements	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:57:25 -0500
Re: AW: [LF] FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	MA/NY DDave	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:50:27 -0500
RoHS Compliant consulting service in Southern California	Henry Mok	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:56:01 -0700
Re: AW: [LF] FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Davy, Gordon	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:01:36 -0400
Re: Ledafree solder Paste: SAC305 v/s SAC405	Michael McMonagle	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:21:02 -0500
Re: Ledafree solder Paste: SAC305 v/s SAC405	Joel Mearig	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:55:56 -0700
Re: Ledafree solder Paste: SAC305 v/s SAC405	Wenger, George M.	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:33:14 -0400
Ledafree solder Paste: SAC305 v/s SAC405	Kanaiyalal Patel	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:17:25 -0700
Re: Mixed Metallugies	Smith, Rick	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:05:59 -0500
Save 10% on Lead Free Conference Dec. 6 - 8 in Boston: Register by Nov. 1	Gwen Jader	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:21:58 -0500
Begin now to manage the information needed to comply with the European Union's RoHS Directive	Gwen Jader	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:01:05 -0500
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Edward Szpruch	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:07:25 +0200
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	James, Chris	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:15:25 +0100
SMART Group Ireland RoHS Mentor Programme	Lead Free Ireland	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:25:21 +0100
Mixed Metallugies	Anupam Choubey	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:35:35 -0500
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Smith, Rick	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:06:59 -0500
Re: Newbie RoHS question - Through Hole components	James, Chris	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:35:33 +0100
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Kallin, Dan	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:12:46 -0400
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Smith, Rick	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:41:38 -0500
Re: Newbie RoHS question - Through Hole components	Davy, Gordon	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:33:27 -0400
Re: Newbie RoHS question - Through Hole components	Werner Engelmaier	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:59:19 EDT
Newbie RoHS question - Through Hole components	Aravind Jois	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:51:15 -0400
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Anchondo, Dan	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:40:40 -0400
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	John Burke	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:50:17 -0700
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Pratap Singh	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:20:32 -0500
Re: choosing solder vendor	Pratap Singh	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:15:03 -0500
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Pratap Singh	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:10:14 -0500
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Pratap Singh	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:05:41 -0500
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Joe Fjelstad	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:45:16 EDT
Re: choosing solder vendor	Lead Free Ireland	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:34:49 +0100
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Kallin, Dan	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:51:24 -0400
Re: choosing solder vendor	James, Chris	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:36:58 +0100
Re: choosing solder vendor	Cheryl Tulkoff	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:12:01 -0500
choosing solder vendor	Phil Nutting	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:05:04 -0400
Re: NTC RE: [LF] RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	James, Chris	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:40:53 +0100
NTC RE: [LF] RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Phil Nutting	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:57:45 -0400
AW: [LF] FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	No Name	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:42:58 +0200
Re: Lead-free Processing Temp Requirements	MA/NY DDave	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:41:24 -0500
Re: FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Joe Fjelstad	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:03:02 EDT
FW: EU exempts Deca-BDE from RoHS Directive	Fern Abrams	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:42:32 -0500
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Smith, Rick	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:06:32 -0500
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	John Burke	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:58:12 -0700
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Tracey Christiansen	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:53:56 -0600
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Tracey Christiansen	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:50:31 -0600
Re: RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	John Burke	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:50:26 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Leo Higgins	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:58:34 -0700
RoHS applies to swap pool repair exchange units!	Tracey Christiansen	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:34:09 -0600
Re: Lead-free Processing Temp Requirements	Werner Engelmaier	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:11:17 -0400
Re: ONSEMI backward compatibility	James, Chris	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:25:46 +0100
[Autoreply] Re: Re: [LF] ONSEMI backward compatibility	Arthur Ackerman	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:10:42 -0400
Re: ONSEMI backward compatibility	Gilbert, Doug	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:02:22 -0700
Yun Zhang/Americas/PWBChemistry/Cookson is out of the office.	Yun Zhang	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:35:21 -0400
Re: Lead-free Processing Temp Requirements	Dave Delman (MA/NY DDave	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:40:48 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Werner Engelmaier	Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:38:09 EDT
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Werner Engelmaier	Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:15:15 EDT
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Leo Higgins	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:05:09 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Leo Higgins	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:02:41 -0700
Re: Lead-free Processing Temp Requirements	David Shaff	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:46:15 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Smith, Rick	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:56:51 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Leo Higgins	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:16:03 -0700
From Jennie Hwang--Response--Bi Effects--Selected Points	<>	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:58:20 EDT
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Joel Mearig	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:54:47 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	David D. Hillman	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:02:13 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	David D. Hillman	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:50:01 -0500
FW: ONSEMI backward compatibility	James, Chris	Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:39:08 +0100
Re: Leadfree Build ---What should I request from my CM?	John Burke	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:34:39 -0700
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:14:22 -0500
Re: Leadfree Build ---What should I request from my CM?	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:52:13 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:25:13 EDT
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	<>	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:01:04 EDT
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Leo Higgins	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:51:28 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Roger Stoops	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:31:51 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:27:47 EDT
Re: Leadfree Build ---What should I request from my CM?	Kanaiyalal Patel	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:24:17 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:15:20 EDT
Re: Leadfree Build ---What should I request from my CM?	Joel Mearig	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:57:20 -0700
Re: Leadfree Build ---What should I request from my CM?	Morse, Carrie	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:42:16 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	<>	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:39:36 EDT
Leadfree Build ---What should I request from my CM?	Kanaiyalal Patel	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:38:50 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Pratap Singh	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:13:51 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Roger Stoops	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:39:37 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Roger Stoops	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:27:19 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Werner Engelmaier	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:07:10 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Pratap Singh	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:24:30 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Roger Stoops	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:31:28 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Smith, Rick	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:59:59 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	David D. Hillman	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:51:50 -0500
AW: [LF] Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	No Name	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:26:01 +0200
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	James, Chris	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:49:07 +0100
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	James, Chris	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:35:55 +0100
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	<>	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:53:04 EDT
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Romm, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:10:32 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Romm, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:57:10 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Smith, Rick	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:44:07 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Roger Stoops	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:08:30 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Romm, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:08:04 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Joel Mearig	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:02:45 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Gilbert, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:50:46 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Gilbert, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:47:18 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Smith, Rick	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:46:32 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Romm, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:43:58 -0500
[Autoreply] Re: Re: [LF] Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Arthur Ackerman	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:39:25 -0400
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	David D. Hillman	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:37:45 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Gilbert, Doug	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:32:12 -0700
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	James, Chris	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:54:38 +0100
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Smith, Rick	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:39:21 -0500
Re: SAC 305 versus Sn100C	<>	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:32:49 EDT
Re: Classification of LCD Modules	James, Chris	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:36:02 +0100
Classification of LCD Modules	to Paul Taylor	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:14:04 +0100
Re: SAC 305 versus Sn100C	No Name	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:32:25 -0500
Re: SAC 305 versus Sn100C	Pratap Singh	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:41:27 -0500
Re: Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Jack Crawford	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:22:33 -0500
Leadfree Processing temp requirement	Kanaiyalal Patel	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:10:15 -0700
Re: RoHS ANNEX item #5 Question/ Clarification	Genny Gibbard	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:39:38 -0600
SAC 305 versus Sn100C	Phil Nutting	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:13:35 -0400
Re: Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	Anchondo, Dan	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:12:55 -0400
Re: Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	Arnold Offner	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:38:28 -0400
Re: Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	James, Chris	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:02:45 +0100
Re: Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	Conklin, Dane	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:55:06 -0700
Re: RoHS ANNEX item #5 Question/ Clarification	James, Chris	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:37:11 +0100
RoHS ANNEX item #5 Question/ Clarification	Smith, Rick	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:31:26 -0500
Re: Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	James, Chris	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:09:57 +0100
Re: Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	John Burke	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:02:47 -0700
Re: RoHS Process Compliant boards	Colleen Salvaggi	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:42:26 -0400
Question of Scope for high-voltage devices	Conklin, Dane	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:38:26 -0700
RoHS Process Compliant boards	Phil Nutting	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:27:52 -0400
Re: Brass CDA 260?	David D. Hillman	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:53:57 -0500
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	John R. Sieber	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:08:18 -0400
Re: Brass CDA 260?	James, Chris	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:27:45 +0100
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	<>	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:51:39 EDT
Re: Brass CDA 260?	Kanaiyalal Patel	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:38:06 -0700
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	Jack Crawford	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:12:56 -0500
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	John R. Sieber	Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:45:41 -0400
John Quick/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office.	John Quick	Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:10:46 -0400
Re: Tinning Stranded Wire with SAC for "Leaded" application	<>	Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:00:17 EDT
Re: Are different solder pots needed for using SnAgCu solder in solderab...	<>	Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:38:44 EDT
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	<>	Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:33:04 EDT
Re: Brass CDA 260?	Oparowski, Joseph	Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:03:29 -0400
Re: Pb contamination in Pb-free solder	Burtt, Nigel	Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:11:38 +0100
Re: Brass CDA 260?	James, Chris	Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:14:53 +0100
Re: UK - RoHS	Roger Bilham	Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:07:57 +0100
Re: Brass CDA 260?	Fox, Ian	Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:52:46 +0100
Re: Brass CDA 260?	James, Chris	Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:14:06 +0100
Brass CDA 260?	Richard Kraszewski	Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:46:57 -0500
Don't Miss Lead Free Conference in Brussels, 17-19 October	Gwen Jader	Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:24:01 -0500
Re: UK - RoHS	MA/NY DDave	Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:03:20 -0500
FW: Final Solder LCA now posted on DfE web site	Fern Abrams	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:38:24 -0500
Re: Pb contamination in Pb-free solder	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:43:54 -0700
Re: Pb contamination in Pb-free solder	<>	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 01:30:22 EDT
[Autoreply] Re: Re: [LF] Print Mis-Positioning of Paste and Reflow Results	Arthur Ackerman	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:55:23 -0400
Re: Print Mis-Positioning of Paste and Reflow Results	<>	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:50:25 EDT
K Balasubramanian is in an official tour.	Balasubramanian Krishnan	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 04:00:52 +0530
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	Davy, Gordon	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:58:55 -0400
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	John R. Sieber	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:34:29 -0400
Don't Wait Register Now for RoHS Compliance Webcast Curriculum!	Michelle Michelotti	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 11:23:34 -0500
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	Davy, Gordon	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:09:44 -0400
UK - RoHS	James, Chris	Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:27:19 +0100
Re: Words	Joe Fjelstad	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:59:34 EDT
Words	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:36:45 -0700
Re: RoHS & WEEE fun Poem	Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:03:48 -0700
Re: RoHS & WEEE fun Poem	John Burke	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:43:20 -0700
Lead free assembly report	John Burke	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:02:10 -0700
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	Kanaiyalal Patel	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:16:18 -0700
Re: Tinning Stranded Wire with SAC for "Leaded" application	MA/NY DDave	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:15:01 -0500
YF Yap/Dynacraft is out of the office.	YF Yap	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 22:01:22 +0800
Tinning Stranded Wire with SAC for "Leaded" application	Morse, Carrie	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:18:06 -0400
Re: Lead: Intentionally added but below 1000 ppm?	James, Chris	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:33:58 +0100

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

LEADFREE Archives

October 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Subject

From

Date