LEADFREE Archives

October 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nic Bowker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:42:24 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
As regards the 10,20 year products being covered - well they already are. Many of our member companies manufacture equipment for theatres/stages productions etc that just simply don't get thrown away for 20 years and get passed form business to business and eventually end up in schools/colleges!

My take on the record retention would be to hold on to it until such time that the product line is dead/not being serviced/manufactured anymore and then hold the documents for four years.

However, as Chuck pointed out there are other Directives out there that require you to hold other documents for longer. So if you've already got one document retention system in place then why not use that?

Nic Bowker
Technical Resources Adviser
PLASA Ltd.
38 St Leonards Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 3UT, UK.
Tel:  +44 (0)1323 410335 : Fax: +44 (0)1323 646905
Email: [log in to unmask] : Website: www.plasa.org

Join one of the largest trade communities in the industry.
www.plasa.org


-----Original Message-----
From: MA/NY DDave [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 29 October 2005 04:13
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] EU requirement for record retention


Hi Jay, IPC LF Listservers,

I am putting this note under the subject started by Dan Anchondo.
It will be easier, at least for me, to find these notes even the notes
titled Re in the future.

I think that Chris and our buddy from NIST have thought about this a bit
more than most.

One thought stream:
Long, LONG after your product and even your company may be gone someone (an
RRR person) at a reduce/reuse/recovery center might ask for information on
your product. I don't think anyone has thought this entire topic out
completely so I would keep the records until you know officially someone
has judged upon it a few times in EU Court.

Any system of record retention has to make sense eventually to a Court.

Another idea:
Soon 10, 20 year, and longer life cycle products might be covered by RoHS
and WEEE. It seems to me that 4 years is far too short for these products.


Yours in Engineering, Dave
YiEngr, MA/NY DDave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2