TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"PERALTA, Kevin (BREA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2001 17:17:26 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (822 bytes) , text/html (1489 bytes)
Kathy,

Thank you for your response. Your standard would solve our problem. I'm not
sure if we could get our vendor to send in a roll. Perhaps we should keep a
poka yoke around for inspection. A poka yoke would be a sample with all of
the correct components on it. Again, thank you!

Regards,
Kevin Peralta

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Kuhlow [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Inspection


Our standard is that if a part can not be positively identified on the part
itself. The original reel would be verified to a component on the assembly
and a component off of the reel.  They must  match (color, termination
style, width, length).  If the part is still not able to be identified then
a component will be removed and tested with the appropriate test equipment.


Kathy


ATOM RSS1 RSS2