LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs (3 messages)
2141A errata microstrip equation (2 messages)
Acceptability of Inverted Resistor Packs or Modules (1 message)
Access (1 message)
Apex Expo (29 messages)
APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval (2 messages)
BGA stencil aperture design guidelines (2 messages)
BGA testing sockets (3 messages)
Bridging on SMD Connector (13 messages)
C4 attach to organic laminate material (1 message)
Capacitor construction - foil alloy question (4 messages)
Ceramic Core PCBs (3 messages)
Coating material (20 messages)
Component Assembly and Design Tool Technology Intechange workshops, March 2009, Santa Clara, California (1 message)
CONFLICT: IPC-2223B and IPC-6013A (1 message)
Conformal Coating Inspection (16 messages)
Conformal coating or encapsulating (4 messages)
Copper Mirror Test (3 messages)
Counterfeit components market data (7 messages)
CRACKED ENIG PADS (31 messages)
Cup terminals. Soldering requirements. (1 message)
dewetting (6 messages)
Earl Moon (12 messages)
EMF shielding of MRAM devices (1 message)
ENIS (3 messages)
Fab house audit guideline/template (3 messages)
Flex Carrier? (6 messages)
FW: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird! (1 message)
FW: [TN] CRACKED ENIG PADS (1 message)
Fw: [TN] NTC anti-this-and-that programs (1 message)
Hello everybody (7 messages)
hi: (2 messages)
Hot Slump (8 messages)
ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information (3 messages)
In Search of a Technical Reference (10 messages)
IPC Component Assembly Workshop Series, March 9-11, 2009, Santa Clara, California (1 message)
IPC through-hole LEAD diameter to HOLE diameter (1 message)
IPC-CC-830 (8 messages)
JEDEC STD 22-A113 question (1 message)
Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP? (8 messages)
Last call for Lead-Free Conference Mar 3-5 (1 message)
Last Chance to Register-IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference Preview - FREE Webinar (1 message)
lead adding (18 messages)
Lead Free solder compatibility (7 messages)
Leadfree has gone too far. (36 messages)
Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability (3 messages)
Looking for manufacturer of air bag deployment modules (1 message)
Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp (6 messages)
LPIM (3 messages)
Make your hotel reservations now for the IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference-March 3-5, 2009 (1 message)
Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird! (12 messages)
microscopes (14 messages)
Misprints (2 messages)
Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly? (5 messages)
MSN (1 message)
No Clean that can be removed? (2 messages)
NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold (13 messages)
NTC anti-this-and-that programs (32 messages)
NTC Look Out! (5 messages)
NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody (4 messages)
NTC [TN] In Search of a Technical Reference (1 message)
Part solderability (25 messages)
PCB'S minimum line width (3 messages)
Permissible current and voltage in PCB (4 messages)
Questionnaire (14 messages)
REACH legislation? How's it going? (2 messages)
Recall: [TN] Safety question (1 message)
Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator (12 messages)
Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste (10 messages)
Register Today! Flex Conference April 21-23, 2009 Minneapolis, Minn. (1 message)
Repair soldermask (8 messages)
robotic dispensing (8 messages)
RoHS list (8 messages)
Rolling MELFs (2 messages)
Safety question (7 messages)
Selective Soldering design rules (1 message)
Sequencer Tape Suppliers? (2 messages)
Soldering Alloy 260 (3 messages)
Staking Question/Help... (9 messages)
Storage of Iag PWAs (5 messages)
Technical Reference for oceanic shipping (5 messages)
Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Cla ss 3 boards (1 message)
Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards (3 messages)
Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB (6 messages)
UMICORE PASTE (1 message)
Vapor degreaser help (1 message)
Vapor Phase Soldering (7 messages)
Virus Hoax (7 messages)
Weird one - bismuth in overmold (12 messages)
Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page? (6 messages)
Wire Bonding Dummy Parts (4 messages)
Workmanship criteria for ipass connector (3 messages)
[NTC] Cool New Google Tool (2 messages)
[NTC] Repair soldermask (1 message)
[TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias (2 messages)
[tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!! (3 messages)
[tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!! (10 messages)
[tinwhiskers] Re: Bourns announces hot dipping of tin - comments? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Re: 2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Wolfgang Erat

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:34:36 -0500

111 lines

Re: 2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Stewart, Dougal

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:31:25 -0000

69 lines

2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Brian Chandler

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:52:47 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

2141A errata microstrip equation

Re: 2141A errata microstrip equation

Craig Sullivan

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:17:11 -0500

91 lines

2141A errata microstrip equation

Michael Holz

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:27:09 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Acceptability of Inverted Resistor Packs or Modules

Acceptability of Inverted Resistor Packs or Modules

Leland Woodall

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:25:44 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Access

Access

Bev Christian

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:56:56 -0500

129 lines

New Thread

Apex Expo

Re: Apex Expo

Joyce Koo

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:02:42 -0500

174 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Douglas Pauls

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:54:19 -0600

140 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Ian Hanna

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:35:30 -0500

300 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Douglas Pauls

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:29:48 -0600

236 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Ahne Oosterhof

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:57:41 -0800

97 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:01:19 -0600

285 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Werner engelmaier

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:54:58 -0500

245 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:44:57 -0700

186 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:43:21 -0700

223 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Graham Naisbitt

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:39:53 +0000

147 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joyce Koo

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:38:13 -0500

175 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:37:03 -0600

196 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Paul Reid

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:33:17 -0500

175 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:14:03 -0700

151 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:58:25 -0600

124 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Paul Reid

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:55:21 -0500

103 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Mike Fenner

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:36:30 -0000

138 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Graham Naisbitt

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:23:02 +0000

85 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Lee parker

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:52:13 -0500

84 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:46:40 -0500

50 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Karen Tellefsen

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:47:38 -0500

200 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:36:45 -0500

139 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:34:35 -0500

93 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:27:33 -0600

78 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:26:09 -0700

64 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Bev Christian

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:24:46 -0500

111 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Wilson, Bob

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:18:24 -0800

97 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Ioan Tempea

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:00:47 -0500

73 lines

Apex Expo

Gen Gibbard

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:38:10 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval

Re: APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval

Joyce Koo

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:36:30 -0500

86 lines

APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval

Kim Sterling

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:01:46 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

BGA stencil aperture design guidelines

Re: BGA stencil aperture design guidelines

Bill Kunkle

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:37:52 -0500

74 lines

BGA stencil aperture design guidelines

Gervascio, Thomas L

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:20:36 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

BGA testing sockets

Re: BGA testing sockets

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:41:19 -0600

136 lines

Re: BGA testing sockets

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:20:49 -0600

78 lines

BGA testing sockets

David Tremmel

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:08:06 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Bridging on SMD Connector

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ted Tontis

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:08:09 -0600

221 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Guy Ramsey

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:29:22 -0500

207 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

P. Langeveld

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:35:18 +0100

221 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:24:28 -0700

190 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ted Tontis

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:08:00 -0600

189 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Randy Morrison

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:37:30 -0800

175 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:29:32 -0700

185 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:24:45 -0700

162 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ted Tontis

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:04:44 -0600

123 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ioan Tempea

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:08:31 -0500

116 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Guy Ramsey

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:56:23 -0500

109 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Steve Kelly

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:49:09 -0500

104 lines

Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:49:33 -0700

74 lines

New Thread

C4 attach to organic laminate material

Re: C4 attach to organic laminate material

Mike Fenner

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:11:57 -0000

101 lines

New Thread

Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Re: Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Hernefjord Ingemar

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:50:58 +0100

111 lines

Re: Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Carl VanWormer

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:24:13 -0800

130 lines

Re: Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Dennis Fritz

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:00:54 -0500

80 lines

Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Carl VanWormer

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:46:44 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

Ceramic Core PCBs

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Werner engelmaier

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:20:22 -0500

87 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Hernefjord Ingemar

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:35:05 +0100

48 lines

Ceramic Core PCBs

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:21:48 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Coating material

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:59:14 -0600

112 lines

Re: Coating material

Joyce Koo

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:53:58 -0500

88 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:59:12 -0600

54 lines

Re: Coating material

Grunde Gjertsen

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:14:46 +0100

191 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:04:57 -0600

46 lines

Re: Coating material

Inge

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 23:59:38 +0100

192 lines

Re: Coating material

Kevin Glidden

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:07:07 -0500

234 lines

Re: Coating material

Douglas Pauls

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:28:38 -0600

209 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:41:50 -0600

156 lines

Re: Coating material

Mike Sewell

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:40:42 -0600

137 lines

Re: Coating material

Joyce Koo

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:27:47 -0500

137 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:26:17 -0600

104 lines

Re: Coating material

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:12:04 -0700

183 lines

Re: Coating material

Kevin Glidden

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:01:26 -0500

140 lines

Re: Coating material

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:38:08 -0700

155 lines

Re: Coating material

Grunde Gjertsen

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:00:47 +0100

99 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:13:59 -0600

106 lines

Re: Coating material

Douglas Pauls

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:32:41 -0600

103 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:56:58 -0600

45 lines

Coating material

Ted Tontis

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:20:29 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

Component Assembly and Design Tool Technology Intechange workshops, March 2009, Santa Clara, California

Component Assembly and Design Tool Technology Intechange workshops, March 2009, Santa Clara, California

Tina Nerad

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:55:58 -0600

68 lines

New Thread

CONFLICT: IPC-2223B and IPC-6013A

Re: CONFLICT: IPC-2223B and IPC-6013A

Anslow, Phillip (UK)

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:30:57 -0000

190 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Inspection

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Lum Wee Mei

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:07:03 +0800

245 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:23:23 -0600

207 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Roberts, Jon

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:18:58 -0600

101 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

John Burke

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:38:23 -0800

180 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:51:36 -0700

249 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:26:35 -0000

214 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:33:09 -0700

176 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:19:22 -0600

149 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:50:03 -0000

127 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:15:25 -0700

83 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:44:41 -0000

127 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:50:20 -0800

131 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Mike Fenner

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:30:52 -0000

92 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Keith Calhoun

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:08:29 -0500

91 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Brian Ellis

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:00:20 +0200

68 lines

Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:52:19 -0000

50 lines

New Thread

Conformal coating or encapsulating

Re: Conformal coating or encapsulating

Phil Nutting

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:02:19 -0500

109 lines

Re: Conformal coating or encapsulating

Graham Collins

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:05:51 -0400

81 lines

Re: Conformal coating or encapsulating

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:05:39 -0600

86 lines

Conformal coating or encapsulating

Phil Nutting

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Copper Mirror Test

Re: Copper Mirror Test

Bev Christian

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:35:34 -0500

141 lines

Re: Copper Mirror Test

Richard Kraszewski

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:19:23 -0600

100 lines

Copper Mirror Test

Bev Christian

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:56:48 -0500

59 lines

New Thread

Counterfeit components market data

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Lee Whiteman

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:35:58 -0500

115 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:34:57 +0100

95 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Bev Christian

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:51:58 -0500

95 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Jerry Dengler

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:29:35 -0500

64 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Bev Christian

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:28:55 -0500

82 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Lee Whiteman

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:25:10 -0500

72 lines

Counterfeit components market data

John Burke

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:22:17 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

CRACKED ENIG PADS

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Paul Reid

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:36:22 -0500

96 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Dwight Mattix

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:23:21 -0800

66 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:50:10 -0700

54 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Dwight Mattix

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:17:14 -0800

27 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Paul Reid

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:48:48 -0500

334 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Bob Willis

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:17:59 -0000

295 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Thayer, Wayne

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:47:11 -0500

401 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Lee Whiteman

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:50:10 -0500

366 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

David D. Hillman

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:33:00 -0600

304 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Werner engelmaier

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:11:33 -0500

335 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:59:17 -0500

201 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Thayer, Wayne

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:42:23 -0500

287 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:31:01 -0600

256 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Sunny Liu

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:20:14 -0800

224 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

John Burke

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:15:04 -0800

257 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:04:53 +0000

208 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Bev Christian

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:01:40 -0500

345 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark)

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:56:19 -0700

309 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Werner engelmaier

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:52:14 -0500

269 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Inge

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:50:06 +0100

99 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Steve Gregory

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:46:01 -0600

231 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:40:39 +0000

152 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Werner engelmaier

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:27:41 -0500

296 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Paul Edwards

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:04:43 -0800

263 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Inge

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:51:02 +0100

67 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Lee Whiteman

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:41:46 -0500

203 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:41:24 +0000

45 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Victor Hernandez

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:23:14 -0600

159 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Wenger, George M.

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:51:09 -0500

85 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Steve Gregory

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:41:42 -0600

76 lines

CRACKED ENIG PADS

Lee Whiteman

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:20:11 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Cup terminals. Soldering requirements.

Cup terminals. Soldering requirements.

Juan T. Marug=?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=E1n?=

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:11:18 -0600

42 lines

New Thread

dewetting

Re: dewetting

Hernefjord Ingemar

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:19:11 +0100

136 lines

Re: dewetting

Brian Ellis

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:08:21 +0200

125 lines

Re: dewetting

Mike Fenner

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:20:01 -0000

138 lines

Re: dewetting

David D. Hillman

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:28:42 -0600

106 lines

Re: dewetting

Brian Ellis

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:02:29 +0200

58 lines

dewetting

Louis Hart

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:23:21 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Earl Moon

Re: Earl Moon

=?gb2312?B?uuggvfA=?=

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:10:09 +0800

127 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Jack Olson

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:51:29 -0600

89 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Ioan Tempea

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:42 -0500

106 lines

Re: Earl Moon

EIMCNews

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:40:24 -0800

69 lines

Earl Moon

Jack Olson

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:28:21 -0600

32 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Randall L Bock

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:43:13 -0500

201 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Joe Fjelstad

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:38:38 EST

154 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Ioan Tempea

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:21:14 -0500

126 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Simonik, Dave R. (David)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:17:30 -0500

104 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Steve Gregory

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:07:31 -0600

74 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Randall L Bock

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:00:47 -0500

92 lines

Earl Moon

Ioan Tempea

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:57:21 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

EMF shielding of MRAM devices

EMF shielding of MRAM devices

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:29:08 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

ENIS

Re: ENIS

Joyce Koo

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:36:30 -0500

138 lines

Re: ENIS

David D. Hillman

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:05:35 -0600

110 lines

ENIS

Ioan Tempea

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:27:39 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Fab house audit guideline/template

Re: Fab house audit guideline/template

Craig Sullivan

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:39:57 -0500

106 lines

Re: Fab house audit guideline/template

Scott Westheimer

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:27:24 -0500

79 lines

Fab house audit guideline/template

Craig Sullivan

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:55:46 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Flex Carrier?

Re: Flex Carrier?

Bob Willis

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:12:24 -0000

140 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

John Parsons

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:29:48 -0800

89 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

John Parsons

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:29:37 -0800

89 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

Joe Fjelstad

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:13:16 EST

150 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

Bob Willis

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:03:04 -0000

101 lines

Flex Carrier?

John Parsons

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:55:55 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

FW: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

FW: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Miller, Rodney

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:24:16 -0600

158 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] CRACKED ENIG PADS

FW: [TN] CRACKED ENIG PADS

Victor Hernandez

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:55:21 -0600

252 lines

New Thread

Fw: [TN] NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Fw: [TN] NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Joyce Koo

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:13:06 -0500

380 lines

New Thread

Hello everybody

Re: Hello everybody

jonathan noquil

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:20:45 +0800

120 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:31:48 -0700

102 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Guy Ramsey

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:11:27 -0500

49 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Barbara Burcham

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:45:30 -0600

50 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:33:32 -0600

76 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Leland Woodall

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:14:56 -0500

56 lines

Hello everybody

Liu, Edwin

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:09:30 +0800

25 lines

New Thread

hi:

Re: hi:

Brian Ellis

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:54:25 +0200

48 lines

hi:

Aquino Quek

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:25:20 +0800

31 lines

New Thread

Hot Slump

Re: Hot Slump

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:06:50 -0700

136 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Graham Naisbitt

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:31:18 +0000

106 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Bev Christian

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:04:16 -0500

96 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Graham Naisbitt

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:41:16 +0000

74 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Mike Fenner

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:03:05 -0000

133 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:16:06 -0600

102 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Richard Kraszewski

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:02:10 -0600

69 lines

Hot Slump

Bev Christian

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:41:00 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

Re: ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

John Goulet

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:12:15 +0000

94 lines

Re: ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

Kevin Glidden

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:53:33 -0500

64 lines

ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

Richard Kraszewski

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:33:32 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

In Search of a Technical Reference

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Brian Ellis

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:09:30 +0200

347 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Inge

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:50:34 +0100

296 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Brian Ellis

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:29:07 +0200

216 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Joyce Koo

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:25:29 -0500

235 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:10:11 -0700

262 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

David D. Hillman

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:38:31 -0600

196 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Mike Fenner

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:04:50 -0000

115 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Brian Ellis

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:29:33 +0200

74 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Bev Christian

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:19:50 -0500

80 lines

In Search of a Technical Reference

David D. Hillman

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:18:41 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

IPC Component Assembly Workshop Series, March 9-11, 2009, Santa Clara, California

IPC Component Assembly Workshop Series, March 9-11, 2009, Santa Clara, California

Tina Nerad

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:19:53 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

IPC through-hole LEAD diameter to HOLE diameter

Re: IPC through-hole LEAD diameter to HOLE diameter

Kim Sparrow

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:22:09 -0600

78 lines

New Thread

IPC-CC-830

Re: IPC-CC-830

Douglas Pauls

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:13:03 -0600

216 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_Bissonnette?=

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:51:58 -0500

132 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Joe Macko

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:06:41 -0800

87 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Douglas Pauls

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:02:06 -0600

101 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Richard Kraszewski

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:32:03 -0600

77 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:23:20 -0800

106 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:47:15 -0700

75 lines

IPC-CC-830

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_Bissonnette?=

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:38:30 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

JEDEC STD 22-A113 question

JEDEC STD 22-A113 question

Joe Macko

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:49:23 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Thayer, Wayne

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:12:05 -0500

177 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Mike Fenner

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:53:37 -0000

149 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Barbara Burcham

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:56:15 -0600

141 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Graham Collins

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:02:52 -0400

116 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Mike Sewell

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:12:55 -0600

89 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Matthias Mansfeld

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:25:59 +0100

54 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Steve Gregory

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:04:30 -0600

81 lines

Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Graham Collins

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:59:05 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Last call for Lead-Free Conference Mar 3-5

Last call for Lead-Free Conference Mar 3-5

Anne Marie Mulvihill

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:23:17 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

Last Chance to Register-IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference Preview - FREE Webinar

Last Chance to Register-IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference Preview - FREE Webinar

Michelle Michelotti

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:07:08 -0600

92 lines

New Thread

lead adding

Re: lead adding

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:16:37 -0600

95 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:23:15 -0500

152 lines

Re: lead adding

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:13:52 EST

344 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:09:34 -0500

102 lines

Re: lead adding

Vladimir Igoshev

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:00:51 -0500

73 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:44:16 -0500

301 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:35:05 -0500

70 lines

Re: lead adding

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:26:09 EST

250 lines

Re: lead adding

Vladimir Igoshev

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:52:23 -0500

39 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:45:56 -0500

205 lines

Re: lead adding

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:45:46 EST

157 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:06:07 -0500

270 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:04:42 -0500

304 lines

Re: lead adding

Joyce Koo

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:02:07 -0500

90 lines

Re: lead adding

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:01:40 +0100

157 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:48:46 -0500

122 lines

Re: lead adding

Joyce Koo

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:09:49 -0500

73 lines

lead adding

Wilson, Bob

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:01:17 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Lead Free solder compatibility

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Mike Fenner

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:52:58 -0000

263 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Tom Burek

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:58:47 -0700

213 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:54:28 -0500

168 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Tom Burek

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:53:07 -0700

112 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

David D. Hillman

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:44:18 -0600

89 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Werner engelmaier

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:34:43 -0500

78 lines

Lead Free solder compatibility

Tom Burek

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:28:00 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Leadfree has gone too far.

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:47:32 -0700

172 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Charlie Pitarys

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:38:45 -0600

111 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Bev Christian

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:27:47 -0500

165 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Inge

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:15:43 +0100

110 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Werner engelmaier

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:11:08 -0500

107 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:04:45 -0800

94 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Joyce Koo

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:35:03 -0500

118 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Upton, Shawn

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:23:43 -0500

83 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:01 -0800

32 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:07:29 -0800

45 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:06:33 -0800

241 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Bev Christian

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:37:07 -0500

271 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Joe Fjelstad

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:09 EST

158 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dennis Fritz

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:30:47 -0500

90 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Ted Tontis

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:25:58 -0600

154 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Brian Ellis

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:14:58 +0200

45 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Steven Creswick

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:49:49 -0500

130 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Joe Fjelstad

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:49:41 EST

78 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dave Dixon

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:47:39 -0600

26 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:29:01 -0600

205 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Graham Collins

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:36:41 -0400

194 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Karen Tellefsen

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:36:56 -0500

160 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Lee Whiteman

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:34:09 -0500

168 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

James Head

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:33:41 -0000

46 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Graham Collins

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:29:59 -0400

203 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

David D. Hillman

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:26:45 -0600

173 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Eric CHRISTISON

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:24:26 +0000

127 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Deac Descoteaux

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:23:30 -0800

118 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Graham Collins

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:22:39 -0400

129 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

keith Calhoun

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:21:51 -0500

131 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Phil Nutting

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:16:07 -0500

100 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Upton, Shawn

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:06:14 -0500

63 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Upton, Shawn

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:59:19 -0500

50 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

David Baldwin

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:47:51 -0700

50 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Steve Gregory

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:45:09 -0600

66 lines

Leadfree has gone too far.

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:10:10 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

Re: Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

David D. Hillman

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:53:15 -0600

82 lines

Re: Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

Leigh-Ann Litavis

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:33:18 +0000

37 lines

Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

Richard Kraszewski

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:27:20 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Looking for manufacturer of air bag deployment modules

Re: Looking for manufacturer of air bag deployment modules

Goulet mail

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:19:15 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

John Goulet

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:21:17 +0000

134 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Carl VanWormer

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:48:13 -0800

146 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:28:34 -0600

105 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:07:55 -0600

83 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Steve Gregory

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:08:36 -0600

76 lines

Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Carl VanWormer

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:25:55 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

LPIM

Re: LPIM

Miller, Rodney

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:52:49 -0600

86 lines

Re: LPIM

Croslin, Robert

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:46:23 -0500

68 lines

LPIM

Miller, Rodney

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:03:29 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Make your hotel reservations now for the IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference-March 3-5, 2009

Make your hotel reservations now for the IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference-March 3-5, 2009

Michelle Michelotti

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:21:48 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

legg

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:24:21 -0600

44 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Steven Creswick

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:09:18 -0500

197 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Thayer, Wayne

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:10:34 -0500

167 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Steven Creswick

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:53:43 -0500

124 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Inge

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:15:12 +0100

81 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Bev Christian

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:40:00 -0500

127 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Ahne Oosterhof

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:33:33 -0800

130 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Thayer, Wayne

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:10:10 -0500

97 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Dave Dixon

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:10:19 -0600

61 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Bev Christian

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:00:24 -0500

129 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Steve Gregory

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:56:53 -0600

90 lines

Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Thayer, Wayne

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:41:44 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

microscopes

Re: microscopes

Victor Hernandez

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:41:26 -0600

72 lines

Re: microscopes

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:43:24 -0800

40 lines

Re: microscopes

Victor Hernandez

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:34:27 -0600

82 lines

Re: microscopes

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:30:18 -0600

74 lines

Re: microscopes

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:12:48 -0800

49 lines

Re: microscopes

David D. Hillman

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:59:49 -0600

116 lines

Re: microscopes

Robert Kondner

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:57:49 -0500

96 lines

Re: microscopes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:56:02 -0700

98 lines

Re: microscopes

Lee Whiteman

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:52:26 -0500

72 lines

Re: microscopes

Inge

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:30:01 +0100

61 lines

Re: microscopes

Thayer, Wayne

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:17:19 -0500

90 lines

Re: microscopes

Paul Reid

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:14:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: microscopes

Victor Hernandez

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:14:07 -0600

63 lines

microscopes

John Foster

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:01:34 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Misprints

Re: Misprints

Jerry Dengler

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:35:37 -0500

88 lines

Misprints

Leif Erik Laerum

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:00:07 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Joyce Koo

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:06:39 -0500

413 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Miller, Rodney

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:59:21 -0600

384 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Joyce Koo

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:44:57 -0500

340 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:39:24 +0100

304 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Kane, Amol (349)

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:00:17 -0500

281 lines

New Thread

MSN

MSN

Liu, Edwin

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:37:25 +0800

37 lines

New Thread

No Clean that can be removed?

Re: No Clean that can be removed?

Brian Ellis

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:17:36 +0200

436 lines

Re: No Clean that can be removed?

John Goulet

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:14:13 +0000

347 lines

New Thread

NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:06:20 -0600

415 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

ALLEN, LOA

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:43:49 -0800

407 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Phil Nutting

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:33:19 -0500

373 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Dennis Fritz

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:20:14 -0500

321 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Victor Hernandez

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:33:02 -0600

249 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:16:03 -0600

312 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Douglas Pauls

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:42 -0600

282 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:42:59 -0600

238 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Lee Whiteman

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:38:21 -0500

261 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Douglas Pauls

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:28:02 -0600

206 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:12:58 -0600

129 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Genny Gibbard

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:56:24 -0600

130 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

David D. Hillman

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:52:22 -0600

97 lines

New Thread

NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:40:07 +0100

61 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:13:29 +0100

199 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:58:55 -0500

149 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:33:05 -0600

115 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:36:55 -0500

78 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

ROGER STOOPS

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:25:12 -0800

348 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Graham Naisbitt

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:28:09 +0000

49 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Mike Fenner

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:58:48 -0000

418 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:12:39 -0500

450 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:34 +0100

343 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:18:29 -0500

369 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:56:49 -0500

403 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Steven Creswick

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:07:51 -0500

335 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:17:41 +0100

253 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:45:03 -0500

276 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:13:02 +0100

241 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Werner engelmaier

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:04:50 -0500

382 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:09:12 +0100

186 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:58:49 -0500

226 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Olav Folland

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:11:44 -0800

156 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:01:17 -0600

190 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

John Burke

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:43:36 -0800

166 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Nivens, Carl W (US SSA)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:20:25 -0500

167 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:20:36 -0500

181 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:20:16 -0600

149 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Phil Nutting

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:12:21 -0500

152 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:50:49 +0100

110 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ian Hanna

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:49:21 -0500

190 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:35:05 -0600

135 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:32:00 -0500

122 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:23:02 -0600

77 lines

NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:06:04 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

NTC Look Out!

Re: NTC Look Out!

Ken Bloomquist

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:32:09 -0800

104 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:28:09 -0600

83 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Lee Whiteman

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:26:48 -0500

62 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:25:04 +0100

53 lines

NTC Look Out!

Steve Gregory

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:18:47 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:09:43 -0700

185 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:50:36 -0500

149 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:35:51 -0700

106 lines

NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Graham Collins

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:21:03 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] In Search of a Technical Reference

Re: NTC [TN] In Search of a Technical Reference

Bev Christian

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:37:15 -0500

333 lines

New Thread

Part solderability

Re: Part solderability

John Goulet

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:38:12 +0000

458 lines

Re: Part solderability

Joyce Koo

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:54:02 -0500

383 lines

Re: Part solderability

Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:47:41 -0500

351 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:42:27 -0600

343 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:23:09 -0400

311 lines

Re: Part solderability

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:30:33 +0100

384 lines

Re: Part solderability

Paul Edwards

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:41:12 -0800

423 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:57:53 -0400

360 lines

Re: Part solderability

Mike Fenner

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:19:58 -0000

322 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:28:57 -0600

285 lines

Re: Part solderability

Wenger, George M.

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:15:02 -0500

148 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:47:26 -0600

188 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:39:20 -0400

151 lines

Re: Part solderability

John Burke

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:49:25 -0800

178 lines

Re: Part solderability

Vladimir Igoshev

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:55:01 -0500

62 lines

Re: Part solderability

Inge

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:04:01 +0100

147 lines

Re: Part solderability

Joyce Koo

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:34:06 -0500

130 lines

Re: Part solderability

Inge

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:13:14 +0100

86 lines

Re: Part solderability

P. Langeveld

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:03:06 +0100

142 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:02:58 -0600

101 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:18:37 -0400

171 lines

Re: Part solderability

Thayer, Wayne

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:00:45 -0500

130 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:18:10 -0400

91 lines

Re: Part solderability

Steve Gregory

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:16:53 -0600

79 lines

Part solderability

Graham Collins

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:12:23 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

PCB'S minimum line width

Re: PCB'S minimum line width

Dennis Fritz

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:17:39 -0500

71 lines

Re: PCB'S minimum line width

Kevin Glidden

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:55:13 -0500

84 lines

PCB'S minimum line width

Cong He

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:07:56 +0800

32 lines

New Thread

Permissible current and voltage in PCB

Re: Permissible current and voltage in PCB

=?utf-8?B?amNraW0o6rmA7KCV7LKgKQ==?=

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:18:18 +0900

72 lines

Re: Permissible current and voltage in PCB

Jack Olson

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:27:26 -0600

65 lines

Re: Permissible current and voltage in PCB

Jack Olson

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:55:10 -0600

51 lines

Permissible current and voltage in PCB

=?UTF-8?B?amNraW0o6rmA7KCV7LKgKQ==?=

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:07:46 +0900

17 lines

New Thread

Questionnaire

Re: Questionnaire

Pete Houwen

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:35:41 -0600

36 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Croslin, Robert

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:12:34 -0500

218 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Chris Knudsen

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:17:43 -0500

166 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Liu, Edwin

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:52:34 +0800

104 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Robert Kondner

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:43:18 -0500

208 lines

Re: Questionnaire

John Foster

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:17:13 -0800

64 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Steve Gregory

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:33:46 -0600

179 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Robert Kondner

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:06:38 -0500

144 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Brian Ellis

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:21:47 +0200

46 lines

Re: Questionnaire

James Head

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:31:53 -0000

48 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Steve Smith

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:20:57 -0500

61 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Karen Tellefsen

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:48:59 -0500

78 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Deac Descoteaux

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:47:08 -0800

48 lines

Questionnaire

Liu, Edwin

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:54:12 +0800

25 lines

New Thread

REACH legislation? How's it going?

Re: REACH legislation? How's it going?

Bev Christian

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:52:19 -0500

74 lines

REACH legislation? How's it going?

Kelly Morris

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:10:52 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

Recall: [TN] Safety question

Recall: [TN] Safety question

Tan Geok Ang

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:15:58 +0800

23 lines

New Thread

Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:45:49 -0500

28 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:02:34 -0500

201 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Bob METCALF

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:55:57 -0800

177 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Jac Kroeker

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:16:23 -0800

131 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:21:56 -0600

96 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:51:05 -0500

116 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Jac Kroeker

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:09:10 -0800

64 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:43:58 -0500

96 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Joe Venditti

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:15:53 -0500

55 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Dave Dixon

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:22:14 -0600

47 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Jerry Dengler

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:08:35 -0500

64 lines

Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:04:12 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Bob Willis

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:54:16 -0000

208 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Steve Gregory

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:27:48 -0600

157 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Vladimir Igoshev

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:13:20 +0000

106 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joyce Koo

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:48:40 -0500

89 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:11:56 -0600

115 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

David D. Hillman

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:43:43 -0600

102 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Vladimir Igoshev

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:33:30 -0500

68 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Gumpert, Ben

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:28:14 -0500

63 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Vladimir Igoshev

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:07:20 -0500

42 lines

Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joe Macko

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:03:39 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

Register Today! Flex Conference April 21-23, 2009 Minneapolis, Minn.

Register Today! Flex Conference April 21-23, 2009 Minneapolis, Minn.

Michelle Michelotti

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:43:01 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Repair soldermask

Re: Repair soldermask

bob wettermann

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:58:50 -0800

53 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Gabriela

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:51:09 +0200

115 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Bev Christian

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:19:14 -0500

194 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:11:13 -0800

177 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Bev Christian

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:51:53 -0500

124 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Steve Gregory

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:44:26 -0600

89 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Andy Price

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:43:40 -0500

95 lines

Repair soldermask

Ioan Tempea

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:47:01 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

robotic dispensing

Re: robotic dispensing

Steven Creswick

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:13:14 -0500

139 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:53:45 +0100

125 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:46:58 +0100

117 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Robert Kondner

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:44:46 -0500

106 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:19:45 +0100

75 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Steven Creswick

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:18:20 -0500

84 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Ken Bloomquist

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:08:43 -0800

45 lines

robotic dispensing

Inge

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:53:41 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

RoHS list

Re: RoHS list

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:40:14 -0600

181 lines

Re: RoHS list

Pete Houwen

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:21:50 -0600

28 lines

Re: RoHS list

Mike Fenner

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:45:03 -0000

92 lines

Re: RoHS list

Joyce Koo

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:52:14 -0500

91 lines

Re: RoHS list

Joyce Koo

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:30:06 -0500

151 lines

Re: RoHS list

John Burke

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:40:17 -0800

113 lines

Re: RoHS list

Bev Christian

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:35:30 -0500

87 lines

RoHS list

Inge

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:09:06 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Rolling MELFs

Re: Rolling MELFs

Paul Edwards

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:05:02 -0800

96 lines

Rolling MELFs

Gervascio, Thomas L

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:59:19 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Safety question

Re: Safety question

Bev Christian

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:28:43 -0500

103 lines

Re: Safety question

Kevin Glidden

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:55:20 -0500

52 lines

Re: Safety question

Pete Houwen

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:04:25 -0600

22 lines

Re: Safety question

Randall L Bock

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:35:11 -0500

126 lines

Re: Safety question

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:31:16 -0600

82 lines

Re: Safety question

Tan Geok Ang

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:15:22 +0800

65 lines

Safety question

Bev Christian

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:01:56 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Selective Soldering design rules

Selective Soldering design rules

Jim Mosher

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:36:59 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

Sequencer Tape Suppliers?

Re: Sequencer Tape Suppliers?

Steve Gregory

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:42:19 -0600

56 lines

Sequencer Tape Suppliers?

Steve Gregory

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:03:51 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Soldering Alloy 260

Re: Soldering Alloy 260

Bob Willis

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:39:34 -0000

165 lines

Re: Soldering Alloy 260

David D. Hillman

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:55:23 -0600

105 lines

Soldering Alloy 260

Ioan Tempea

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:38:59 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Staking Question/Help...

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Kevin Glidden

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:59:53 -0500

145 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Steve Gregory

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:52:43 -0600

136 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Temkin, Gregg

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:53:10 -0800

207 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Ian Hanna

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:17:08 -0500

172 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Fox, Ian

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:06:42 -0000

93 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Kevin Glidden

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:59:00 -0500

124 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Kevin Glidden

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:55:32 -0500

107 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

keith Calhoun

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:47:30 -0500

82 lines

Staking Question/Help...

Steve Gregory

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:33:35 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Storage of Iag PWAs

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:28:27 -0600

196 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Gary Camac

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:49:20 -0600

152 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Dennis Fritz

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:12:57 -0500

75 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:14:58 -0700

75 lines

Storage of Iag PWAs

Gary Camac

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:24:36 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

=?UTF-8?B?Q29uIE3hu410IFPDoWNo?=

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:25:00 +0700

155 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Kevin Glidden

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:14:22 -0500

122 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Kevin Glidden

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:01:40 -0500

86 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Mike Sewell

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:16:18 -0600

61 lines

Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

=?UTF-8?B?Q29uIE3hu410IFPDoWNo?=

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:56:25 +0700

32 lines

New Thread

Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Cla ss 3 boards

Re: Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Cla ss 3 boards

Stewart, Dougal

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:43:43 -0000

102 lines

New Thread

Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

Re: Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

ROGER STOOPS

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:46:40 -0800

76 lines

Re: Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

John Foster

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:04:00 -0800

88 lines

Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

Bray, Anita (GE EntSol, Security)

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:42:37 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:36:11 -0600

149 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:57:57 -0600

152 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:54:45 -0600

127 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Leif Erik Laerum

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:55:32 -0600

90 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:13:19 -0600

64 lines

Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Ray Kong

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:19:06 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

UMICORE PASTE

Re: UMICORE PASTE

John Goulet

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:40:39 +0000

132 lines

New Thread

Vapor degreaser help

Vapor degreaser help

Ted Tontis

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:02:19 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Vapor Phase Soldering

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:10:03 -0700

148 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Brian Ellis

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:52:30 +0200

178 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

P. Langeveld

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:07:42 +0100

117 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Hernefjord Ingemar

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:00:30 +0100

82 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Louis Hart

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:20:16 -0500

54 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Hernefjord Ingemar

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:23:02 +0100

319 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Hernefjord Ingemar

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:07:41 +0100

298 lines

New Thread

Virus Hoax

Re: Virus Hoax

Inge

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:30:44 +0100

130 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Croslin, Robert

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:41:44 -0500

206 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

<>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:59:12 EST

23 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Ken Bloomquist

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:49:45 -0800

36 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Phil Nutting

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:18:16 -0500

186 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Inge

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:34:00 +0100

140 lines

Virus Hoax

Robert Kondner

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:49:00 -0500

96 lines

New Thread

Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D.

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:40:42 -0600

94 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Ian Hanna

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:45:24 -0500

72 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:23:58 -0800

45 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:55:34 +0000

89 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

David D. Hillman

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:41:56 -0600

155 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:37:01 +0000

76 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Bev Christian

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:30:34 -0500

80 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

David D. Hillman

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:23:37 -0600

88 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:10 +0000

88 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Bev Christian

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:59:20 -0500

100 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:05:21 +0000

50 lines

Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Bev Christian

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:51:31 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Ioan Tempea

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:52:22 -0500

60 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Lee Whiteman

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:40:47 -0500

134 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

David D. Hillman

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:36:22 -0600

97 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Ioan Tempea

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:32:41 -0500

99 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Lee Whiteman

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:26:59 -0500

80 lines

Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Ioan Tempea

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:18:17 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Re: Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Steven Creswick

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:49:14 -0500

124 lines

Re: Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Thayer, Wayne

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:01 -0500

78 lines

Re: Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Scott Rougeux

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:21:06 -0600

131 lines

Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

bob wettermann

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:03:20 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

Re: Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

John Goulet

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:12:37 +0000

67 lines

Re: Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

Guy Ramsey

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:03:43 -0500

61 lines

Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

Rudolph yu

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:22:51 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

[NTC] Cool New Google Tool

Re: [NTC] Cool New Google Tool

Pete Houwen

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:59:54 -0600

28 lines

[NTC] Cool New Google Tool

Ken Bloomquist

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:39:39 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

[NTC] Repair soldermask

Re: [NTC] Repair soldermask

Ken Bloomquist

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:57:15 -0800

243 lines

New Thread

[TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias

Re: [TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias

Stewart, Dougal

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:47:15 -0000

167 lines

Re: [TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:39:03 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Re: [tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:26:36 -0500

198 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Inge

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:19:20 +0100

102 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:52:47 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:00:53 -0600

691 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:14:36 -0500

682 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

John Burke

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:49:56 -0800

674 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Ian Hanna

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:50:12 -0500

648 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:39:20 -0500

606 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

John Burke

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:34:21 -0800

576 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:19:19 -0500

547 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

John Burke

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:26:51 -0800

504 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:24:17 -0500

476 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:56:43 -0500

277 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] Re: Bourns announces hot dipping of tin - comments?

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: Bourns announces hot dipping of tin - comments?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:00:03 -0700

2436 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager