LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs (3 messages)
2141A errata microstrip equation (2 messages)
Acceptability of Inverted Resistor Packs or Modules (1 message)
Access (1 message)
Apex Expo (29 messages)
APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval (2 messages)
BGA stencil aperture design guidelines (2 messages)
BGA testing sockets (3 messages)
Bridging on SMD Connector (13 messages)
C4 attach to organic laminate material (1 message)
Capacitor construction - foil alloy question (4 messages)
Ceramic Core PCBs (3 messages)
Coating material (20 messages)
Component Assembly and Design Tool Technology Intechange workshops, March 2009, Santa Clara, California (1 message)
CONFLICT: IPC-2223B and IPC-6013A (1 message)
Conformal Coating Inspection (16 messages)
Conformal coating or encapsulating (4 messages)
Copper Mirror Test (3 messages)
Counterfeit components market data (7 messages)
CRACKED ENIG PADS (31 messages)
Cup terminals. Soldering requirements. (1 message)
dewetting (6 messages)
Earl Moon (12 messages)
EMF shielding of MRAM devices (1 message)
ENIS (3 messages)
Fab house audit guideline/template (3 messages)
Flex Carrier? (6 messages)
FW: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird! (1 message)
FW: [TN] CRACKED ENIG PADS (1 message)
Fw: [TN] NTC anti-this-and-that programs (1 message)
Hello everybody (7 messages)
hi: (2 messages)
Hot Slump (8 messages)
ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information (3 messages)
In Search of a Technical Reference (10 messages)
IPC Component Assembly Workshop Series, March 9-11, 2009, Santa Clara, California (1 message)
IPC through-hole LEAD diameter to HOLE diameter (1 message)
IPC-CC-830 (8 messages)
JEDEC STD 22-A113 question (1 message)
Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP? (8 messages)
Last call for Lead-Free Conference Mar 3-5 (1 message)
Last Chance to Register-IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference Preview - FREE Webinar (1 message)
lead adding (18 messages)
Lead Free solder compatibility (7 messages)
Leadfree has gone too far. (36 messages)
Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability (3 messages)
Looking for manufacturer of air bag deployment modules (1 message)
Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp (6 messages)
LPIM (3 messages)
Make your hotel reservations now for the IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference-March 3-5, 2009 (1 message)
Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird! (12 messages)
microscopes (14 messages)
Misprints (2 messages)
Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly? (5 messages)
MSN (1 message)
No Clean that can be removed? (2 messages)
NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold (13 messages)
NTC anti-this-and-that programs (32 messages)
NTC Look Out! (5 messages)
NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody (4 messages)
NTC [TN] In Search of a Technical Reference (1 message)
Part solderability (25 messages)
PCB'S minimum line width (3 messages)
Permissible current and voltage in PCB (4 messages)
Questionnaire (14 messages)
REACH legislation? How's it going? (2 messages)
Recall: [TN] Safety question (1 message)
Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator (12 messages)
Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste (10 messages)
Register Today! Flex Conference April 21-23, 2009 Minneapolis, Minn. (1 message)
Repair soldermask (8 messages)
robotic dispensing (8 messages)
RoHS list (8 messages)
Rolling MELFs (2 messages)
Safety question (7 messages)
Selective Soldering design rules (1 message)
Sequencer Tape Suppliers? (2 messages)
Soldering Alloy 260 (3 messages)
Staking Question/Help... (9 messages)
Storage of Iag PWAs (5 messages)
Technical Reference for oceanic shipping (5 messages)
Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Cla ss 3 boards (1 message)
Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards (3 messages)
Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB (6 messages)
UMICORE PASTE (1 message)
Vapor degreaser help (1 message)
Vapor Phase Soldering (7 messages)
Virus Hoax (7 messages)
Weird one - bismuth in overmold (12 messages)
Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page? (6 messages)
Wire Bonding Dummy Parts (4 messages)
Workmanship criteria for ipass connector (3 messages)
[NTC] Cool New Google Tool (2 messages)
[NTC] Repair soldermask (1 message)
[TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias (2 messages)
[tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!! (3 messages)
[tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!! (10 messages)
[tinwhiskers] Re: Bourns announces hot dipping of tin - comments? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Brian Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:52:47 -0600

26 lines

Re: 2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:31:25 -0000

69 lines

Re: 2-D Laser Etch Barcodes on PCBs

Wolfgang Erat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:34:36 -0500

111 lines

New Thread

2141A errata microstrip equation

2141A errata microstrip equation

Michael Holz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:27:09 -0600

40 lines

Re: 2141A errata microstrip equation

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:17:11 -0500

91 lines

New Thread

Acceptability of Inverted Resistor Packs or Modules

Acceptability of Inverted Resistor Packs or Modules

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:25:44 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Access

Access

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:56:56 -0500

129 lines

New Thread

Apex Expo

Apex Expo

Gen Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:38:10 -0800

31 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:00:47 -0500

73 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:18:24 -0800

97 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:24:46 -0500

111 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:26:09 -0700

64 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:27:33 -0600

78 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:34:35 -0500

93 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:36:45 -0500

139 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:47:38 -0500

200 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:46:40 -0500

50 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:52:13 -0500

84 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:23:02 +0000

85 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:36:30 -0000

138 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:55:21 -0500

103 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:58:25 -0600

124 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:14:03 -0700

151 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:33:17 -0500

175 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:37:03 -0600

196 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:38:13 -0500

175 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:39:53 +0000

147 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:43:21 -0700

223 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:44:57 -0700

186 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:54:58 -0500

245 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:01:19 -0600

285 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:57:41 -0800

97 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:29:48 -0600

236 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:35:30 -0500

300 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:54:19 -0600

140 lines

Re: Apex Expo

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:02:42 -0500

174 lines

New Thread

APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval

APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:01:46 -0600

45 lines

Re: APEX EXPO - more ideas on getting approval

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:36:30 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

BGA stencil aperture design guidelines

BGA stencil aperture design guidelines

Gervascio, Thomas L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:20:36 -0500

44 lines

Re: BGA stencil aperture design guidelines

Bill Kunkle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:37:52 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

BGA testing sockets

BGA testing sockets

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:08:06 +0000

47 lines

Re: BGA testing sockets

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:20:49 -0600

78 lines

Re: BGA testing sockets

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:41:19 -0600

136 lines

New Thread

Bridging on SMD Connector

Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:49:33 -0700

74 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:49:09 -0500

104 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:56:23 -0500

109 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:08:31 -0500

116 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:04:44 -0600

123 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:24:45 -0700

162 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:29:32 -0700

185 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Randy Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:37:30 -0800

175 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:08:00 -0600

189 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:24:28 -0700

190 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:35:18 +0100

221 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:29:22 -0500

207 lines

Re: Bridging on SMD Connector

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:08:09 -0600

221 lines

New Thread

C4 attach to organic laminate material

Re: C4 attach to organic laminate material

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:11:57 -0000

101 lines

New Thread

Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:46:44 -0800

53 lines

Re: Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:00:54 -0500

80 lines

Re: Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:24:13 -0800

130 lines

Re: Capacitor construction - foil alloy question

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:50:58 +0100

111 lines

New Thread

Ceramic Core PCBs

Ceramic Core PCBs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:21:48 -0500

26 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:35:05 +0100

48 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:20:22 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

Coating material

Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:20:29 -0600

51 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:56:58 -0600

45 lines

Re: Coating material

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:32:41 -0600

103 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:13:59 -0600

106 lines

Re: Coating material

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:00:47 +0100

99 lines

Re: Coating material

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:38:08 -0700

155 lines

Re: Coating material

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:01:26 -0500

140 lines

Re: Coating material

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:12:04 -0700

183 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:26:17 -0600

104 lines

Re: Coating material

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:27:47 -0500

137 lines

Re: Coating material

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:40:42 -0600

137 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:41:50 -0600

156 lines

Re: Coating material

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:28:38 -0600

209 lines

Re: Coating material

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:07:07 -0500

234 lines

Re: Coating material

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 23:59:38 +0100

192 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:04:57 -0600

46 lines

Re: Coating material

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:14:46 +0100

191 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:59:12 -0600

54 lines

Re: Coating material

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:53:58 -0500

88 lines

Re: Coating material

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:59:14 -0600

112 lines

New Thread

Component Assembly and Design Tool Technology Intechange workshops, March 2009, Santa Clara, California

Component Assembly and Design Tool Technology Intechange workshops, March 2009, Santa Clara, California

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:55:58 -0600

68 lines

New Thread

CONFLICT: IPC-2223B and IPC-6013A

Re: CONFLICT: IPC-2223B and IPC-6013A

Anslow, Phillip (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:30:57 -0000

190 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Inspection

Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:52:19 -0000

50 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:00:20 +0200

68 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:08:29 -0500

91 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:30:52 -0000

92 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:50:20 -0800

131 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:44:41 -0000

127 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:15:25 -0700

83 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:50:03 -0000

127 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:19:22 -0600

149 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:33:09 -0700

176 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:26:35 -0000

214 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:51:36 -0700

249 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:38:23 -0800

180 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Roberts, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:18:58 -0600

101 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:23:23 -0600

207 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Inspection

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:07:03 +0800

245 lines

New Thread

Conformal coating or encapsulating

Conformal coating or encapsulating

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0500

47 lines

Re: Conformal coating or encapsulating

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:05:39 -0600

86 lines

Re: Conformal coating or encapsulating

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:05:51 -0400

81 lines

Re: Conformal coating or encapsulating

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:02:19 -0500

109 lines

New Thread

Copper Mirror Test

Copper Mirror Test

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:56:48 -0500

59 lines

Re: Copper Mirror Test

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:19:23 -0600

100 lines

Re: Copper Mirror Test

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:35:34 -0500

141 lines

New Thread

Counterfeit components market data

Counterfeit components market data

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:22:17 -0800

32 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:25:10 -0500

72 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:28:55 -0500

82 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:29:35 -0500

64 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:51:58 -0500

95 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:34:57 +0100

95 lines

Re: Counterfeit components market data

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:35:58 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

CRACKED ENIG PADS

CRACKED ENIG PADS

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:20:11 -0500

42 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:41:42 -0600

76 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:51:09 -0500

85 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:23:14 -0600

159 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:41:24 +0000

45 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:41:46 -0500

203 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:51:02 +0100

67 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:04:43 -0800

263 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:27:41 -0500

296 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:40:39 +0000

152 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:46:01 -0600

231 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:50:06 +0100

99 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:52:14 -0500

269 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:56:19 -0700

309 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:01:40 -0500

345 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:04:53 +0000

208 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:15:04 -0800

257 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Sunny Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:20:14 -0800

224 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:31:01 -0600

256 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:42:23 -0500

287 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:59:17 -0500

201 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:11:33 -0500

335 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:33:00 -0600

304 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:50:10 -0500

366 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:47:11 -0500

401 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:17:59 -0000

295 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:48:48 -0500

334 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:17:14 -0800

27 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:50:10 -0700

54 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:23:21 -0800

66 lines

Re: CRACKED ENIG PADS

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:36:22 -0500

96 lines

New Thread

Cup terminals. Soldering requirements.

Cup terminals. Soldering requirements.

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:11:18 -0600

42 lines

New Thread

dewetting

dewetting

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:23:21 -0500

45 lines

Re: dewetting

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:02:29 +0200

58 lines

Re: dewetting

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:28:42 -0600

106 lines

Re: dewetting

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:20:01 -0000

138 lines

Re: dewetting

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:08:21 +0200

125 lines

Re: dewetting

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:19:11 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

Earl Moon

Earl Moon

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:57:21 -0500

41 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:00:47 -0500

92 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:07:31 -0600

74 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Simonik, Dave R. (David) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:17:30 -0500

104 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:21:14 -0500

126 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:38:38 EST

154 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:43:13 -0500

201 lines

Earl Moon

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:28:21 -0600

32 lines

Re: Earl Moon

EIMCNews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:40:24 -0800

69 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:42 -0500

106 lines

Re: Earl Moon

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:51:29 -0600

89 lines

Re: Earl Moon

鸿 金 <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:10:09 +0800

127 lines

New Thread

EMF shielding of MRAM devices

EMF shielding of MRAM devices

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:29:08 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

ENIS

ENIS

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:27:39 -0500

48 lines

Re: ENIS

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:05:35 -0600

110 lines

Re: ENIS

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:36:30 -0500

138 lines

New Thread

Fab house audit guideline/template

Fab house audit guideline/template

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:55:46 -0600

33 lines

Re: Fab house audit guideline/template

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:27:24 -0500

79 lines

Re: Fab house audit guideline/template

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:39:57 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

Flex Carrier?

Flex Carrier?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:55:55 -0800

53 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:03:04 -0000

101 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:13:16 EST

150 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:29:37 -0800

89 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:29:48 -0800

89 lines

Re: Flex Carrier?

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:12:24 -0000

140 lines

New Thread

FW: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

FW: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Miller, Rodney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:24:16 -0600

158 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] CRACKED ENIG PADS

FW: [TN] CRACKED ENIG PADS

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:55:21 -0600

252 lines

New Thread

Fw: [TN] NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Fw: [TN] NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:13:06 -0500

380 lines

New Thread

Hello everybody

Hello everybody

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:09:30 +0800

25 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:14:56 -0500

56 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:33:32 -0600

76 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:45:30 -0600

50 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:11:27 -0500

49 lines

Re: Hello everybody

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:31:48 -0700

102 lines

Re: Hello everybody

jonathan noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:20:45 +0800

120 lines

New Thread

hi:

hi:

Aquino Quek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:25:20 +0800

31 lines

Re: hi:

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:54:25 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

Hot Slump

Hot Slump

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:41:00 -0500

40 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:02:10 -0600

69 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:16:06 -0600

102 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:03:05 -0000

133 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:41:16 +0000

74 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:04:16 -0500

96 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:31:18 +0000

106 lines

Re: Hot Slump

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:06:50 -0700

136 lines

New Thread

ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:33:32 -0600

30 lines

Re: ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:53:33 -0500

64 lines

Re: ICOM 5000 ROSE Tester Contact Information

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:12:15 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

In Search of a Technical Reference

In Search of a Technical Reference

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:18:41 -0600

36 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:19:50 -0500

80 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:29:33 +0200

74 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:04:50 -0000

115 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:38:31 -0600

196 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:10:11 -0700

262 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:25:29 -0500

235 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:29:07 +0200

216 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:50:34 +0100

296 lines

Re: In Search of a Technical Reference

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:09:30 +0200

347 lines

New Thread

IPC Component Assembly Workshop Series, March 9-11, 2009, Santa Clara, California

IPC Component Assembly Workshop Series, March 9-11, 2009, Santa Clara, California

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:19:53 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

IPC through-hole LEAD diameter to HOLE diameter

Re: IPC through-hole LEAD diameter to HOLE diameter

Kim Sparrow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:22:09 -0600

78 lines

New Thread

IPC-CC-830

IPC-CC-830

Jean-François Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:38:30 -0500

45 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:47:15 -0700

75 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:23:20 -0800

106 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:32:03 -0600

77 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:02:06 -0600

101 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:06:41 -0800

87 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Jean-François Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:51:58 -0500

132 lines

Re: IPC-CC-830

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:13:03 -0600

216 lines

New Thread

JEDEC STD 22-A113 question

JEDEC STD 22-A113 question

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:49:23 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:59:05 -0400

53 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:04:30 -0600

81 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:25:59 +0100

54 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:12:55 -0600

89 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:02:52 -0400

116 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:56:15 -0600

141 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:53:37 -0000

149 lines

Re: Jumper wire forming for fine pitch QFP?

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:12:05 -0500

177 lines

New Thread

Last call for Lead-Free Conference Mar 3-5

Last call for Lead-Free Conference Mar 3-5

Anne Marie Mulvihill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:23:17 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

Last Chance to Register-IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference Preview - FREE Webinar

Last Chance to Register-IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference Preview - FREE Webinar

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:07:08 -0600

92 lines

New Thread

lead adding

lead adding

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:01:17 -0800

38 lines

Re: lead adding

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:09:49 -0500

73 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:48:46 -0500

122 lines

Re: lead adding

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:01:40 +0100

157 lines

Re: lead adding

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:02:07 -0500

90 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:04:42 -0500

304 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:06:07 -0500

270 lines

Re: lead adding

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:45:46 EST

157 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:45:56 -0500

205 lines

Re: lead adding

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:52:23 -0500

39 lines

Re: lead adding

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:26:09 EST

250 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:35:05 -0500

70 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:44:16 -0500

301 lines

Re: lead adding

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:00:51 -0500

73 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:09:34 -0500

102 lines

Re: lead adding

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:13:52 EST

344 lines

Re: lead adding

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:23:15 -0500

152 lines

Re: lead adding

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:16:37 -0600

95 lines

New Thread

Lead Free solder compatibility

Lead Free solder compatibility

Tom Burek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:28:00 -0700

30 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:34:43 -0500

78 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:44:18 -0600

89 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Tom Burek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:53:07 -0700

112 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:54:28 -0500

168 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Tom Burek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:58:47 -0700

213 lines

Re: Lead Free solder compatibility

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:52:58 -0000

263 lines

New Thread

Leadfree has gone too far.

Leadfree has gone too far.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:10:10 -0600

28 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:45:09 -0600

66 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

David Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:47:51 -0700

50 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:59:19 -0500

50 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:06:14 -0500

63 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:16:07 -0500

100 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:21:51 -0500

131 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:22:39 -0400

129 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Deac Descoteaux <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:23:30 -0800

118 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:24:26 +0000

127 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:26:45 -0600

173 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:29:59 -0400

203 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:33:41 -0000

46 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:34:09 -0500

168 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:36:56 -0500

160 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:36:41 -0400

194 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:29:01 -0600

205 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:47:39 -0600

26 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:49:41 EST

78 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:49:49 -0500

130 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:14:58 +0200

45 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:25:58 -0600

154 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:30:47 -0500

90 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:09 EST

158 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:37:07 -0500

271 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:06:33 -0800

241 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:07:29 -0800

45 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:01 -0800

32 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:23:43 -0500

83 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:35:03 -0500

118 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:04:45 -0800

94 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:11:08 -0500

107 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:15:43 +0100

110 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:27:47 -0500

165 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:38:45 -0600

111 lines

Re: Leadfree has gone too far.

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:47:32 -0700

172 lines

New Thread

Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:27:20 -0600

33 lines

Re: Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

Leigh-Ann Litavis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:33:18 +0000

37 lines

Re: Local Solder Dross Recovery & solder joint reliability

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:53:15 -0600

82 lines

New Thread

Looking for manufacturer of air bag deployment modules

Re: Looking for manufacturer of air bag deployment modules

Goulet mail <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:19:15 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:25:55 -0800

54 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:08:36 -0600

76 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:07:55 -0600

83 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:28:34 -0600

105 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:48:13 -0800

146 lines

Re: Looking for test fixture quick release snap-in hold-down clamp

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:21:17 +0000

134 lines

New Thread

LPIM

LPIM

Miller, Rodney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:03:29 -0600

33 lines

Re: LPIM

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:46:23 -0500

68 lines

Re: LPIM

Miller, Rodney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:52:49 -0600

86 lines

New Thread

Make your hotel reservations now for the IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference-March 3-5, 2009

Make your hotel reservations now for the IPC/JEDEC Lead Free Conference-March 3-5, 2009

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:21:48 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:41:44 -0500

51 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:56:53 -0600

90 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:00:24 -0500

129 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:10:19 -0600

61 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:10:10 -0500

97 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:33:33 -0800

130 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:40:00 -0500

127 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:15:12 +0100

81 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:53:43 -0500

124 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:10:34 -0500

167 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:09:18 -0500

197 lines

Re: Maybe not counterfeit, but definitely weird!

legg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:24:21 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

microscopes

microscopes

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:01:34 -0800

32 lines

Re: microscopes

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:14:07 -0600

63 lines

Re: microscopes

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:14:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: microscopes

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:17:19 -0500

90 lines

Re: microscopes

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:30:01 +0100

61 lines

Re: microscopes

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:52:26 -0500

72 lines

Re: microscopes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:56:02 -0700

98 lines

Re: microscopes

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:57:49 -0500

96 lines

Re: microscopes

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:59:49 -0600

116 lines

Re: microscopes

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:12:48 -0800

49 lines

Re: microscopes

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:30:18 -0600

74 lines

Re: microscopes

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:34:27 -0600

82 lines

Re: microscopes

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:43:24 -0800

40 lines

Re: microscopes

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:41:26 -0600

72 lines

New Thread

Misprints

Misprints

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:00:07 -0600

40 lines

Re: Misprints

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:35:37 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:00:17 -0500

281 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:39:24 +0100

304 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:44:57 -0500

340 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Miller, Rodney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:59:21 -0600

384 lines

Re: Moisture Content of PWB's for Assembly?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:06:39 -0500

413 lines

New Thread

MSN

MSN

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:37:25 +0800

37 lines

New Thread

No Clean that can be removed?

Re: No Clean that can be removed?

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:14:13 +0000

347 lines

Re: No Clean that can be removed?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:17:36 +0200

436 lines

New Thread

NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:52:22 -0600

97 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:56:24 -0600

130 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:12:58 -0600

129 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:28:02 -0600

206 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:38:21 -0500

261 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:42:59 -0600

238 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:42 -0600

282 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:16:03 -0600

312 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:33:02 -0600

249 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:20:14 -0500

321 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:33:19 -0500

373 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

ALLEN, LOA <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:43:49 -0800

407 lines

Re: NTC - Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:06:20 -0600

415 lines

New Thread

NTC anti-this-and-that programs

NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:06:04 +0100

40 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:23:02 -0600

77 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:32:00 -0500

122 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:35:05 -0600

135 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:49:21 -0500

190 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:50:49 +0100

110 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:12:21 -0500

152 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:20:16 -0600

149 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:20:36 -0500

181 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Nivens, Carl W (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:20:25 -0500

167 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:43:36 -0800

166 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:01:17 -0600

190 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Olav Folland <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:11:44 -0800

156 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:58:49 -0500

226 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:09:12 +0100

186 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:04:50 -0500

382 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:13:02 +0100

241 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:45:03 -0500

276 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:17:41 +0100

253 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:07:51 -0500

335 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:56:49 -0500

403 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:18:29 -0500

369 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:34 +0100

343 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:12:39 -0500

450 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:58:48 -0000

418 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:28:09 +0000

49 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

ROGER STOOPS <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:25:12 -0800

348 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:36:55 -0500

78 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:33:05 -0600

115 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:58:55 -0500

149 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:13:29 +0100

199 lines

Re: NTC anti-this-and-that programs

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:40:07 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

NTC Look Out!

NTC Look Out!

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:18:47 -0600

27 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:25:04 +0100

53 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:26:48 -0500

62 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:28:09 -0600

83 lines

Re: NTC Look Out!

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:32:09 -0800

104 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:21:03 -0400

78 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:35:51 -0700

106 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:50:36 -0500

149 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Hello everybody

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:09:43 -0700

185 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] In Search of a Technical Reference

Re: NTC [TN] In Search of a Technical Reference

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:37:15 -0500

333 lines

New Thread

Part solderability

Part solderability

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:12:23 -0400

49 lines

Re: Part solderability

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:16:53 -0600

79 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:18:10 -0400

91 lines

Re: Part solderability

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:00:45 -0500

130 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:18:37 -0400

171 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:02:58 -0600

101 lines

Re: Part solderability

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:03:06 +0100

142 lines

Re: Part solderability

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:13:14 +0100

86 lines

Re: Part solderability

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:34:06 -0500

130 lines

Re: Part solderability

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:04:01 +0100

147 lines

Re: Part solderability

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:55:01 -0500

62 lines

Re: Part solderability

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:49:25 -0800

178 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:39:20 -0400

151 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:47:26 -0600

188 lines

Re: Part solderability

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:15:02 -0500

148 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:28:57 -0600

285 lines

Re: Part solderability

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:19:58 -0000

322 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:57:53 -0400

360 lines

Re: Part solderability

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:41:12 -0800

423 lines

Re: Part solderability

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:30:33 +0100

384 lines

Re: Part solderability

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:23:09 -0400

311 lines

Re: Part solderability

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:42:27 -0600

343 lines

Re: Part solderability

Kane, Joseph E (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:47:41 -0500

351 lines

Re: Part solderability

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:54:02 -0500

383 lines

Re: Part solderability

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:38:12 +0000

458 lines

New Thread

PCB'S minimum line width

PCB'S minimum line width

Cong He <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:07:56 +0800

32 lines

Re: PCB'S minimum line width

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:55:13 -0500

84 lines

Re: PCB'S minimum line width

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:17:39 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Permissible current and voltage in PCB

Permissible current and voltage in PCB

jckim(김정철) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:07:46 +0900

17 lines

Re: Permissible current and voltage in PCB

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:55:10 -0600

51 lines

Re: Permissible current and voltage in PCB

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:27:26 -0600

65 lines

Re: Permissible current and voltage in PCB

jckim(김정철) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:18:18 +0900

72 lines

New Thread

Questionnaire

Questionnaire

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:54:12 +0800

25 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Deac Descoteaux <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:47:08 -0800

48 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:48:59 -0500

78 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:20:57 -0500

61 lines

Re: Questionnaire

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:31:53 -0000

48 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:21:47 +0200

46 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:06:38 -0500

144 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:33:46 -0600

179 lines

Re: Questionnaire

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:17:13 -0800

64 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:43:18 -0500

208 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:52:34 +0800

104 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Chris Knudsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:17:43 -0500

166 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:12:34 -0500

218 lines

Re: Questionnaire

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:35:41 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

REACH legislation? How's it going?

REACH legislation? How's it going?

Kelly Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:10:52 -0600

29 lines

Re: REACH legislation? How's it going?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:52:19 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Recall: [TN] Safety question

Recall: [TN] Safety question

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:15:58 +0800

23 lines

New Thread

Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:04:12 -0500

27 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:08:35 -0500

64 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:22:14 -0600

47 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Joe Venditti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:15:53 -0500

55 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:43:58 -0500

96 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Jac Kroeker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:09:10 -0800

64 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:51:05 -0500

116 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:21:56 -0600

96 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Jac Kroeker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:16:23 -0800

131 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:55:57 -0800

177 lines

Re: Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:02:34 -0500

201 lines

Recommendation for a rapid prototype PCB fabricator

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:45:49 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:03:39 -0800

53 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:07:20 -0500

42 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:28:14 -0500

63 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:33:30 -0500

68 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:43:43 -0600

102 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:11:56 -0600

115 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:48:40 -0500

89 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:13:20 +0000

106 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:27:48 -0600

157 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:54:16 -0000

208 lines

New Thread

Register Today! Flex Conference April 21-23, 2009 Minneapolis, Minn.

Register Today! Flex Conference April 21-23, 2009 Minneapolis, Minn.

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:43:01 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Repair soldermask

Repair soldermask

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:47:01 -0500

41 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Andy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:43:40 -0500

95 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:44:26 -0600

89 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:51:53 -0500

124 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:11:13 -0800

177 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:19:14 -0500

194 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

Gabriela <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:51:09 +0200

115 lines

Re: Repair soldermask

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:58:50 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

robotic dispensing

robotic dispensing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:53:41 +0100

32 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:08:43 -0800

45 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:18:20 -0500

84 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:19:45 +0100

75 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:44:46 -0500

106 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:46:58 +0100

117 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:53:45 +0100

125 lines

Re: robotic dispensing

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:13:14 -0500

139 lines

New Thread

RoHS list

RoHS list

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:09:06 +0100

47 lines

Re: RoHS list

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:35:30 -0500

87 lines

Re: RoHS list

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:40:17 -0800

113 lines

Re: RoHS list

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:30:06 -0500

151 lines

Re: RoHS list

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:52:14 -0500

91 lines

Re: RoHS list

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:45:03 -0000

92 lines

Re: RoHS list

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:21:50 -0600

28 lines

Re: RoHS list

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:40:14 -0600

181 lines

New Thread

Rolling MELFs

Rolling MELFs

Gervascio, Thomas L <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:59:19 -0500

39 lines

Re: Rolling MELFs

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:05:02 -0800

96 lines

New Thread

Safety question

Safety question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:01:56 -0500

35 lines

Re: Safety question

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:15:22 +0800

65 lines

Re: Safety question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:31:16 -0600

82 lines

Re: Safety question

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:35:11 -0500

126 lines

Re: Safety question

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:04:25 -0600

22 lines

Re: Safety question

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:55:20 -0500

52 lines

Re: Safety question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:28:43 -0500

103 lines

New Thread

Selective Soldering design rules

Selective Soldering design rules

Jim Mosher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:36:59 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

Sequencer Tape Suppliers?

Sequencer Tape Suppliers?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:03:51 -0600

31 lines

Re: Sequencer Tape Suppliers?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:42:19 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

Soldering Alloy 260

Soldering Alloy 260

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:38:59 -0500

47 lines

Re: Soldering Alloy 260

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:55:23 -0600

105 lines

Re: Soldering Alloy 260

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:39:34 -0000

165 lines

New Thread

Staking Question/Help...

Staking Question/Help...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:33:35 -0600

48 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:47:30 -0500

82 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:55:32 -0500

107 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:59:00 -0500

124 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:06:42 -0000

93 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:17:08 -0500

172 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:53:10 -0800

207 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:52:43 -0600

136 lines

Re: Staking Question/Help...

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:59:53 -0500

145 lines

New Thread

Storage of Iag PWAs

Storage of Iag PWAs

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:24:36 -0600

43 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:14:58 -0700

75 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:12:57 -0500

75 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:49:20 -0600

152 lines

Re: Storage of Iag PWAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:28:27 -0600

196 lines

New Thread

Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Con Mọt Sách <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:56:25 +0700

32 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:16:18 -0600

61 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:01:40 -0500

86 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:14:22 -0500

122 lines

Re: Technical Reference for oceanic shipping

Con Mọt Sách <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:25:00 +0700

155 lines

New Thread

Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Cla ss 3 boards

Re: Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Cla ss 3 boards

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:43:43 -0000

102 lines

New Thread

Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

Bray, Anita (GE EntSol, Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:42:37 -0500

44 lines

Re: Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:04:00 -0800

88 lines

Re: Typical Cost difference between IPC-6012 Class 2 and Class 3 boards

ROGER STOOPS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:46:40 -0800

76 lines

New Thread

Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Ray Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:19:06 -0800

31 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:13:19 -0600

64 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:55:32 -0600

90 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:54:45 -0600

127 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:57:57 -0600

152 lines

Re: Ultrasonic cleaner for PCB

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:36:11 -0600

149 lines

New Thread

UMICORE PASTE

Re: UMICORE PASTE

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:40:39 +0000

132 lines

New Thread

Vapor degreaser help

Vapor degreaser help

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:02:19 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Vapor Phase Soldering

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:07:41 +0100

298 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:23:02 +0100

319 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:20:16 -0500

54 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:00:30 +0100

82 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:07:42 +0100

117 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:52:30 +0200

178 lines

Re: Vapor Phase Soldering

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:10:03 -0700

148 lines

New Thread

Virus Hoax

Virus Hoax

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:49:00 -0500

96 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:34:00 +0100

140 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:18:16 -0500

186 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:49:45 -0800

36 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:59:12 EST

23 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:41:44 -0500

206 lines

Re: Virus Hoax

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:30:44 +0100

130 lines

New Thread

Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:51:31 -0500

40 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:05:21 +0000

50 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:59:20 -0500

100 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:10 +0000

88 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:23:37 -0600

88 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:30:34 -0500

80 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:37:01 +0000

76 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:41:56 -0600

155 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:55:34 +0000

89 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:23:58 -0800

45 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:45:24 -0500

72 lines

Re: Weird one - bismuth in overmold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:40:42 -0600

94 lines

New Thread

Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:18:17 -0500

43 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:26:59 -0500

80 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:32:41 -0500

99 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:36:22 -0600

97 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:40:47 -0500

134 lines

Re: Where's the JCAA-JG-PP page?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:52:22 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:03:20 -0800

28 lines

Re: Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Scott Rougeux <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:21:06 -0600

131 lines

Re: Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:01 -0500

78 lines

Re: Wire Bonding Dummy Parts

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:49:14 -0500

124 lines

New Thread

Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:22:51 +0000

39 lines

Re: Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:03:43 -0500

61 lines

Re: Workmanship criteria for ipass connector

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:12:37 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

[NTC] Cool New Google Tool

[NTC] Cool New Google Tool

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:39:39 -0800

27 lines

Re: [NTC] Cool New Google Tool

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:59:54 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

[NTC] Repair soldermask

Re: [NTC] Repair soldermask

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:57:15 -0800

243 lines

New Thread

[TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias

Re: [TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:39:03 -0700

123 lines

Re: [TC] [IPC-600-6012] Microvias

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:47:15 -0000

167 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Re: [tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:52:47 -0500

75 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:19:20 +0100

102 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:26:36 -0500

198 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:56:43 -0500

277 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:24:17 -0500

476 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:26:51 -0800

504 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:19:19 -0500

547 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:34:21 -0800

576 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:39:20 -0500

606 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:50:12 -0500

648 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:49:56 -0800

674 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:14:36 -0500

682 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: - RoHS & BGAs!!!

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:00:53 -0600

691 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] Re: Bourns announces hot dipping of tin - comments?

Re: [tinwhiskers] Re: Bourns announces hot dipping of tin - comments?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:00:03 -0700

2436 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager