TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mary Davis" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
25 Sep 1995 11:52:40 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
                       Subject:                               Time:9:22 AM
  OFFICE MEMO          Insp. of Low Residue Hd. Soldering     Date:9/25/95
We are about to implement a low residue hand soldering operation in a
military application.  With customer permission, the flux residue from low
residue soldering will not be considered a MIL-STD-2000A defect.  We must
transition from an inspection philosophy that considers all flux residues a
defect to one that allows flux residues from low residue soldering.  We need
to re-train inspectors and re-write inspections procedures to accomodate the
change.  Before we go down the path of trying to verbalize the visual
differences between acceptable flux residues and unacceptable flux residues,
I thought I might look to TechNet.  Are there folks out there with experience
to share on this subject?  Your help would be greatly appreciated. 

Mary Davis
[log in to unmask]




ATOM RSS1 RSS2