Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sxGqG-0000GwC; Mon, 25 Sep 95 11:57 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
25 Sep 1995 11:52:40 -0600 |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"QzpLM1.0.EU8.fzjPm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
53:05 1996 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Subject: Time:9:22 AM
OFFICE MEMO Insp. of Low Residue Hd. Soldering Date:9/25/95
We are about to implement a low residue hand soldering operation in a
military application. With customer permission, the flux residue from low
residue soldering will not be considered a MIL-STD-2000A defect. We must
transition from an inspection philosophy that considers all flux residues a
defect to one that allows flux residues from low residue soldering. We need
to re-train inspectors and re-write inspections procedures to accomodate the
change. Before we go down the path of trying to verbalize the visual
differences between acceptable flux residues and unacceptable flux residues,
I thought I might look to TechNet. Are there folks out there with experience
to share on this subject? Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Mary Davis
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|