TECHNET Archives

July 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_a3.191c314a.288d9b67_boundary"
Sender:
Subject:
From:
"Stephen R. Gregory" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:23:19 EDT
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (622 bytes) , text/html (1035 bytes)
Hi Steve!

The formula that has been floating around for a while is that you get
30-grams of surface tension for every square inch of pad surface....

-Steve Gregory-


> Question?
>
> There is a formula somewhere which I can use to calculate the maximum
> allowable mass of a component in relation to the pad lands. Basically I
> want to make sure our designers do not put components on the underside
> of the PCB which are going to fall off during doublesided reflow.
>
> I would like to point out that this is a design for manufacturability
> question, not an attack on the tentative grasp on reality some card
> designers have.
>
> Steve.
>




ATOM RSS1 RSS2