TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Peter Swanson)
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 06 Jul 1995 18:09:51 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
One of our customers has a query:

"I am adopting IPC standards in our company, especially in regard to pcb 
flatness.

IPC 610 (para 8.3) gives 0.75% for populated surface mount boards.

IPC 600 (para 10.1) requires on average 1.5% with only 6 instances (T4 sized 
boards) where flatness is better than 0.75% and this is for _non-populated_ 
boards.

I find this confusing - can you advise."

We note that IPC 600 says that flatness requirements stated may not meet 
surface mount requirements. What will the new revision of 600 say?

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
               Peter Swanson, Oxfordshire, England
                     Dynamix Technology Ltd
                   [log in to unmask]
                    CompuServe: 100120,3641

 If you tied buttered toast to the back of a cat and dropped it from a height,
                        what would happen?
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o



ATOM RSS1 RSS2