TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t8YEw-0000IOC; Thu, 26 Oct 95 14:45 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!manserve.com!Myron.Papiz>
Date:
Thu, 26 Oct 95 14:29:56 CST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/108
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
13:21 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"kkfxQ3.0.0SA.GL-Zm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
     
     The appearance of the palladium plated lead IC solder joints continues 
     to create anxieties with our customers.  This occurs because they see 
     a solder connection profile which is different than would result from 
     a pb/sn plated lead connection.  Texas Instruments has published a 
     booklet demonstrating and discussing the differences, but this is not 
     completely sufficient to convince some of our customers.  
     
     Is there any 'work in progress' material available from IPC and/or 
     other sources which can be used to graphically educate auditors and 
     customers about acceptable appearances of palladium plated lead solder 
     joints?  Now our auditors and customers reference the IPC-A-610 Rev. B 
     manual.
     
     
     Thank you.
     Myron Papiz
     MSL



ATOM RSS1 RSS2