LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


March 2013


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem. (2 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
Antwort: Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610 (1 message)
BARE PCB disposing (6 messages)
BGA Rework reflow Profile (1 message)
Buried/blind/stacked via layups (1 message)
Call for Papers: SMART Group European Conference & Exhibition 2-3 October 2013, Oxfordshire, England (1 message)
Call For Participation - Reflow Oven Characterization Standard (2 messages)
Cleanliness (10 messages)
Coating stripping facility (7 messages)
Conductive path failure in thermal cycling (20 messages)
Conformal Coat and Board Edges (16 messages)
Conformal Coat and Bubbles (23 messages)
Conformal Coating and J1 / 610 (25 messages)
Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight (9 messages)
corrosion under Solder Mask (12 messages)
Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables (15 messages)
Diva's name (2 messages)
Drop box (3 messages)
Dropbox (28 messages)
Dropbox need feedback (7 messages)
Excellent Discssion on Vater Vapor (3 messages)
Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints (16 messages)
EXTERNAL: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.) (1 message)
EXTERNAL: [TN] Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints (1 message)
EXTERNAL: [TN] Requirements for Dry Cabinet (3 messages)
Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot... (5 messages)
Friday Quiz (1 message)
Fw: corrosion under Solder Mask (1 message)
guess an artist (1 message)
how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured? (6 messages)
Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute (22 messages)
I thin this is the correct Diva's name (1 message)
INACTIVE MIL-PRF DOCUMENTS (2 messages)
IPC 6012 Class 3 Approval (1 message)
IPC procedure for disconnecting one soldered lead of a SMT component (3 messages)
IPC-6012 (19 messages)
IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb (6 messages)
Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot... (10 messages)
Mixing Solders (4 messages)
Non-Conductive Via Filling (2 messages)
Non-HASL finishes and J-STD-003B durability conditioning (2 messages)
Notes in PCB Fabrication (8 messages)
NTC 37 seconds video (4 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer (26 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz Question (60 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz Question - Bayesian Filter detected spam (2 messages)
ODB++ to gerber? (4 messages)
Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.) (18 messages)
R: [TN] BGA Rework reflow Profile (1 message)
Requirements for Dry Cabinet (1 message)
SAC 305 etch (8 messages)
Solder Mask sensitivity to environment (2 messages)
solder mask thickness (2 messages)
Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine (32 messages)
solder which does ot scavenge gold (22 messages)
SOLDERMASK THICKNESS FOR SPRAY COATED MACHINE (1 message)
Tape test (7 messages)
Thin Film Measurement (2 messages)
To characterize or not (6 messages)
Wed Whisker call in (1 message)
Which ESD Standard (11 messages)
x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill (14 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

Re: 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

Smith, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:29:15 +0000

112 lines

Re: 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:12:39 -0500

126 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:27:28 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

Antwort: Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Antwort: Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Frank Kriesch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:39:38 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

BARE PCB disposing

BARE PCB disposing

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 06:34:29 -0600

21 lines

Re: BARE PCB disposing

Kuczynski, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:23:09 -0500

55 lines

Re: BARE PCB disposing

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:55:23 -0500

73 lines

Re: BARE PCB disposing

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:09:34 -0600

82 lines

Re: BARE PCB disposing

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 05:32:36 +0000

41 lines

Re: BARE PCB disposing

Afri Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 19:37:24 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

BGA Rework reflow Profile

BGA Rework reflow Profile

Çetin Yeğin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:46:13 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

Buried/blind/stacked via layups

Re: Buried/blind/stacked via layups

Jason Zhao <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:28:15 -0600

77 lines

New Thread

Call for Papers: SMART Group European Conference & Exhibition 2-3 October 2013, Oxfordshire, England

Call for Papers: SMART Group European Conference & Exhibition 2-3 October 2013, Oxfordshire, England

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:10:45 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

Call For Participation - Reflow Oven Characterization Standard

Call For Participation - Reflow Oven Characterization Standard

Kris Roberson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:50:10 +0000

29 lines

Re: Call For Participation - Reflow Oven Characterization Standard

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:46:05 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Cleanliness

Cleanliness

Sue Powers-Hartman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:50:24 -0500

18 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:29:28 +0000

32 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:32:18 +0000

30 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 04:52:07 -0700

32 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:15:56 -0500

55 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:19:01 +0000

69 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:20:21 -0500

83 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:33:06 +0000

96 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Sue Powers-Hartman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:14:52 -0500

14 lines

Re: Cleanliness

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:20:01 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

Coating stripping facility

Coating stripping facility

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 20:19:03 +0000

38 lines

Re: Coating stripping facility

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:36:35 -0500

67 lines

Re: Coating stripping facility

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:58:54 +0000

68 lines

Re: Coating stripping facility

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:01:45 -0500

68 lines

Re: Coating stripping facility

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:04:47 -0600

107 lines

Re: Coating stripping facility

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:29:14 +0000

120 lines

Re: Coating stripping facility

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:58:18 -0500

128 lines

New Thread

Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:34:01 +0000

45 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:29:32 -0600

74 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 21:05:42 +0000

89 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 01:50:50 +0000

113 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 02:25:42 +0000

94 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:09:21 +0000

145 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Mar 2013 19:59:28 +0000

157 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:08:34 -0600

125 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:22:57 +0000

141 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:35:45 +0000

114 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:36:09 +0000

95 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:37:55 -0600

157 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:42:32 +0000

167 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:52:03 -0600

183 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:53:02 +0000

183 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:59:04 -0600

194 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:07:21 +0000

129 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:14:31 +0000

193 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:28:57 +0000

147 lines

Re: Conductive path failure in thermal cycling

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 05:49:06 +0000

171 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:42:42 -0500

25 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

lduso - Diamond-MT.com <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:51:03 -0400

55 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:54:15 -0300

48 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:03:53 +0000

77 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:16:58 +0000

76 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

lee Hitchens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:39:45 +0000

139 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:55:32 +0000

57 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:56:01 +0000

147 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:55:14 +0100

57 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:59:16 +0100

186 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:32:44 -0500

94 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:36:05 -0500

159 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:37:42 -0500

74 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:39:26 +0000

109 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:40:50 +0000

138 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Board Edges

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:39:05 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:18:44 -0500

40 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:29:56 +0000

60 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[ARES CORP] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:29:31 -0500

69 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[ARES CORP] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:31:23 -0500

84 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:16:09 +0000

147 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:01:43 +0000

89 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:29:01 -0500

86 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:01:43 +0000

94 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:29:01 -0500

90 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 01:03:22 +0100

63 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 03:47:36 +0000

67 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:00:42 -0500

100 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:19:04 -0500

99 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:40:36 +0000

117 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:54:47 -0500

139 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:06:06 +0000

159 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:17:42 +0000

155 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:20:48 +0200

74 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:38:26 +0100

100 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:37:05 -0500

129 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:41:26 +0200

244 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:51:55 +0000

180 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Bubbles

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:17:36 +0000

265 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:06:02 -0600

43 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 11:17:49 -0500

72 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

lee Hitchens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:28:18 +0000

34 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:33:16 -0600

93 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 11:45:03 -0500

119 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:54:31 -0600

146 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:03:40 +0200

158 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

MacFadden, Todd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:20:59 +0000

78 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:26:45 +0000

173 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:27:35 -0500

174 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:03:36 +0000

128 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:08:03 +0000

143 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:10:33 +0000

153 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:15:34 -0500

173 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 04:17:08 +0000

157 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 04:39:13 +0000

57 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:43:13 -0600

89 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:19:46 -0700

109 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:48:14 -0600

28 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:19:27 -0500

54 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:04:15 -0600

37 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:28:45 -0500

76 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:07:24 +0000

85 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:48:29 -0500

104 lines

Re: Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:07:39 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:40:29 -0400

35 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:37:26 +0000

50 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:04:17 -0500

57 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:22:47 -0400

77 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:32:26 -0500

120 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:46:11 +0000

78 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:39:27 +0000

109 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:31:41 +0000

138 lines

Re: Cooling of Solder Paste Overnight

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 04:30:08 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

corrosion under Solder Mask

corrosion under Solder Mask

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:13:34 -0600

28 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:29:17 +0000

37 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 19:15:17 -0600

19 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Mar 2013 02:07:23 +0000

47 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Terrym <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 22:39:23 -0500

50 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Terrym <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 22:41:22 -0500

45 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Mar 2013 22:31:42 +0100

82 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Terrym <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Mar 2013 20:11:14 -0500

109 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 01:26:04 +0000

87 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:37:15 +0100

152 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:56:51 +0000

67 lines

Re: corrosion under Solder Mask

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:29:10 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Paul Black <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:20:35 -0500

23 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:51:24 -0500

38 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:51:38 +0000

47 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Paul Black <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:06:01 -0500

14 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:14:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Paul Black <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:19:53 +0000

49 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:37:14 +0000

64 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:51:58 -0500

76 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:00:21 +0000

34 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Paul Black <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:22:17 +0000

64 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:39:30 +0000

113 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:51:02 -0500

76 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Paul Black <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:02:09 +0000

88 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:13:59 +0000

109 lines

Re: Detecting Cut Wire Strands on Insulation Displacement Cables

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:38:34 +0000

139 lines

New Thread

Diva's name

Re: Diva's name

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:05:55 +0100

52 lines

Re: Diva's name

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:12:20 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

Drop box

Re: Drop box

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:17:09 -0600

61 lines

Re: Drop box

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:26:07 -0800

89 lines

Re: Drop box

Steven Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:28:54 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

Dropbox

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:06:04 +0100

31 lines

Dropbox

Grossmann, Guenter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:17:30 +0000

27 lines

Re: Dropbox

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:29:19 -0500

43 lines

Re: Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:49:27 +0100

45 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:16:12 +0100

23 lines

Re: Dropbox

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:47:08 -0600

50 lines

Re: Dropbox

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:45:25 +0000

63 lines

Re: Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 22:54:16 +0100

64 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:09:19 +0100

56 lines

Re: Dropbox

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:49:27 -0800

83 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:06:01 +0100

22 lines

Re: Dropbox

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:24:39 -0600

74 lines

Re: Dropbox

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:25:55 -0600

98 lines

Re: Dropbox

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:30:30 +0000

92 lines

Re: Dropbox

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:13:47 +0000

48 lines

Re: Dropbox

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:12:07 +0000

60 lines

Re: Dropbox

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:25:57 +0000

83 lines

Re: Dropbox

Gönül Özden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:00:14 +0200

26 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:32:57 +0100

25 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 00:54:54 -0800

34 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:21:47 +0100

51 lines

Re: Dropbox

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:00:21 -0500

81 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:03:26 -0700

26 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:55:30 +0100

24 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:45:53 -0700

24 lines

Dropbox

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:05:19 -0700

27 lines

Re: Dropbox

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:25:18 -0500

49 lines

Re: Dropbox

Laura J Turbini <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:37:05 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Dropbox need feedback

Dropbox need feedback

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:15:33 +0100

29 lines

Re: Dropbox need feedback

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:10:15 +0000

53 lines

Re: Dropbox need feedback

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 18:57:23 +0100

63 lines

Re: Dropbox need feedback

Linaks Microelectronics Ltd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 16:08:50 -0800

91 lines

Re: Dropbox need feedback

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:16:59 -0800

66 lines

Re: Dropbox need feedback

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:26:56 -0600

90 lines

Re: Dropbox need feedback

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 01:45:00 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Excellent Discssion on Vater Vapor

Excellent Discssion on Vater Vapor

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:29:14 -0400

38 lines

Re: Excellent Discssion on Vater Vapor

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:13:54 -0400

57 lines

Re: Excellent Discssion on Vater Vapor

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:18:36 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:41:22 -0500

22 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:51:09 +0000

48 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:00:33 -0500

22 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:04:09 +0000

102 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:31:55 +0000

84 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:48:10 -0400

102 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:24:26 +0000

45 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:27:54 +0000

56 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:57:19 +0000

66 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:48:10 -0400

107 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:04:09 +0000

107 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:51:09 +0000

52 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:31:55 +0000

89 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:05:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:24:26 +0000

50 lines

Re: Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:00:33 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Gervascio, Thomas L <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:37:01 +0000

343 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: [TN] Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] Explaining why pretty solder joints arn't good solder joints

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:32:54 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: [TN] Requirements for Dry Cabinet

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] Requirements for Dry Cabinet

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 18:56:09 +0000

68 lines

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] Requirements for Dry Cabinet

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:51:48 -0500

95 lines

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] Requirements for Dry Cabinet

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:15:49 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot...

Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:20:59 -0400

54 lines

Re: Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot...

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:38:11 -0400

77 lines

Re: Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot...

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:42:53 -0500

41 lines

Re: Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot...

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:38:36 +0000

95 lines

Re: Extra Lead Free solder in wave solder pot...

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:05:30 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

Friday Quiz

Friday Quiz

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:52:56 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Fw: corrosion under Solder Mask

Re: Fw: corrosion under Solder Mask

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:06:55 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

guess an artist

guess an artist

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 21:26:51 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

Robert James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:19:04 -0600

28 lines

Re: how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:31:30 -0600

65 lines

Re: how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 19:00:24 -0500

105 lines

Re: how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 06:10:03 -0500

41 lines

Re: how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:55:27 +0000

74 lines

Re: how is "oxygen-free" defined and measured?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:07:25 +0000

90 lines

New Thread

Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:23:44 -0500

40 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:35:05 -0500

62 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:37:19 -0500

92 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:32:49 -0500

110 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:50:13 -0800

149 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:16:29 -0500

136 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:21:37 -0500

125 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:25:11 -0500

161 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:35:09 -0500

145 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:44:32 -0600

39 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:51:51 -0500

199 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:07:36 -0500

186 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:43:23 -0500

273 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Brian Stumm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:02:36 -0800

281 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:00:26 -0500

277 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:14:54 -0500

66 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:22:48 -0500

331 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:35:35 -0600

22 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:08:02 +0200

133 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:47:31 -0400

174 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 04:59:49 -0400

159 lines

Re: Humidity Measurements: Relative or Absolute

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:26:19 +0100

179 lines

New Thread

I thin this is the correct Diva's name

Re: I thin this is the correct Diva's name

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:44:05 +0100

162 lines

New Thread

INACTIVE MIL-PRF DOCUMENTS

INACTIVE MIL-PRF DOCUMENTS

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:02:43 -0500

23 lines

Re: INACTIVE MIL-PRF DOCUMENTS

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:31:10 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

IPC 6012 Class 3 Approval

IPC 6012 Class 3 Approval

Pradeep Menon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:30:04 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

IPC procedure for disconnecting one soldered lead of a SMT component

IPC procedure for disconnecting one soldered lead of a SMT component

Mordechai Kirshenbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:30:18 -0500

31 lines

Re: IPC procedure for disconnecting one soldered lead of a SMT component

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:49:16 +0000

53 lines

Re: IPC procedure for disconnecting one soldered lead of a SMT component

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:47:41 -0700

78 lines

New Thread

IPC-6012

IPC-6012

Vladimir Igoshev. PhD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:18:02 -0400

43 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:51:14 -0400

67 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:03:33 +0000

58 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:50:59 -0400

55 lines

Re: IPC-6012

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:05:32 -0700

77 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:09:34 +0000

102 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:51:48 +0000

57 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:55:39 +0000

74 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:25:17 -0400

71 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:44:27 -0500

90 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:52:00 +0000

54 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Steven Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:55:11 -0400

85 lines

Re: IPC-6012

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:05:44 -0400

123 lines

Re: IPC-6012

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:18:52 -0400

148 lines

Re: IPC-6012

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:48:58 -0700

141 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:01:26 +0100

65 lines

Re: IPC-6012

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:08:21 -0800

106 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:19:16 +0000

60 lines

Re: IPC-6012

Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 03:17:58 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:33:20 +0000

37 lines

Re: IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:24:13 -0500

76 lines

Re: IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:46:52 -0500

138 lines

Re: IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:05:40 +0000

120 lines

Re: IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

Per-Erik Tegehall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:17:07 +0000

174 lines

Re: IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:00:38 -0500

262 lines

New Thread

Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:56:54 -0400

61 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Yu-Shan Han <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:15:02 -0700

82 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:38:46 -0500

131 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:33:32 -0400

159 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:13:39 -0400

182 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:14:02 +0000

205 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:28:16 -0400

32 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:13:39 -0500

59 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Yu-Shan Han <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:20:58 -0700

94 lines

Re: Low Tin Levels in wave solder pot...

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:16:02 -0700

67 lines

New Thread

Mixing Solders

Mixing Solders

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:43:00 +0000

39 lines

Re: Mixing Solders

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:08:00 +0000

44 lines

Re: Mixing Solders

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:22:04 -0500

68 lines

Re: Mixing Solders

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:49:04 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

Non-Conductive Via Filling

Non-Conductive Via Filling

David Quiroz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:07:48 -0700

27 lines

Re: Non-Conductive Via Filling

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:35:31 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

Non-HASL finishes and J-STD-003B durability conditioning

Non-HASL finishes and J-STD-003B durability conditioning

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:55:21 +0000

39 lines

Re: Non-HASL finishes and J-STD-003B durability conditioning

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:12:00 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Notes in PCB Fabrication

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:52:56 +0000

50 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Nutting, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:35:50 +0000

69 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:36:43 -0600

30 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:39:48 +0000

83 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:44:26 +0000

96 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:52:46 +0000

52 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:24:31 -0600

67 lines

Re: Notes in PCB Fabrication

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:52:10 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

NTC 37 seconds video

NTC 37 seconds video

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 08:13:18 +0100

24 lines

Re: NTC 37 seconds video

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:56:26 +0000

58 lines

Re: NTC 37 seconds video

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:13:05 +0000

71 lines

Re: NTC 37 seconds video

Gary Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:58:42 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:15:17 +0000

138 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:39:32 +0000

117 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:14:29 -0600

159 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:21:13 -0600

159 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:59:35 -0600

89 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

jrusseau.precisionanalysts.com <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:33:23 -0500

119 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:26:23 +0000

228 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:30:09 -0600

98 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:39:00 +0000

145 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:43:55 -0600

150 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:50:30 +0000

199 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:25:15 +0100

134 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:43:08 +0000

103 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:10:27 +0000

133 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:38:24 -0500

100 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:49:31 +0000

132 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:53:41 -0400

139 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:57:10 -0700

160 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:40:35 +0000

182 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:12:57 +0200

145 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:03:36 +0000

150 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:24:33 +0200

196 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:57:09 +0000

182 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:46:31 -0500

91 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:17:16 -0500

92 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:46:21 +0200

143 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 06:42:52 -0600

65 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

jrusseau.precisionanalysts.com <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:55:48 -0500

89 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:10:16 +0000

66 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:25:03 +0000

80 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:45:49 +0000

105 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:48:52 -0500

20 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:13:20 -0600

83 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Steve Mikell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:28:54 -0500

23 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:35:39 -0800

123 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:44:18 -0800

122 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:28:40 +0000

117 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:30:25 -0600

20 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:45:52 -0500

102 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 03:51:40 +0000

99 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Nigel Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:02:03 -0600

14 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:52:49 -0600

112 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:13:41 -0600

140 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:22:50 -0600

21 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:24:50 +0000

102 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:30:33 +0100

141 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:49:24 +0000

94 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Robert Wolfe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:54:31 -0500

117 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:46:22 +0100

126 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Mar 2013 22:13:33 -0500

175 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:02:27 -0500

184 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:33:11 +0000

204 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:50:39 -0500

222 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:12:52 +0000

242 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:02:20 +0200

194 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:52:46 -0500

87 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Mark Kostinovsky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:58:10 +0000

123 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:01:22 -0700

129 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:08:00 -0400

105 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:30:52 +0000

122 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:43:30 -0700

132 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 02:53:07 +0000

104 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Gönül Özden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:00:22 +0200

136 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:15:02 -0400

129 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Bush, Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:32:19 -0400

117 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:03:05 -0500

36 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Arbour, Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:26:38 -0400

37 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:13:22 -0500

96 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:21:51 +0000

35 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Arbour, Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:24:58 -0400

138 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Steve Mikell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:20:17 -0400

77 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:01:38 -0500

151 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:56:15 -0500

163 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:52:17 +0000

228 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:59:13 -0500

82 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:13:06 +0200

96 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:14:11 -0500

20 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:34:15 +0000

92 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:24:08 -0400

107 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Mordechai Kirshenbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:26:15 -0700

139 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:24:33 -0500

185 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:37:27 -0500

204 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:53:19 -0500

218 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

lduso - Diamond-MT.com <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:56:10 -0400

238 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:39:28 +0000

302 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:02:16 -0500

260 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz Question - Bayesian Filter detected spam

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question - Bayesian Filter detected spam

Bush, Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:18:35 -0500

143 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz Question - Bayesian Filter detected spam

Doug Schueller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:02:45 +0000

159 lines

New Thread

ODB++ to gerber?

ODB++ to gerber?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:46 -0300

35 lines

Re: ODB++ to gerber?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:02:05 -0500

61 lines

Re: ODB++ to gerber?

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:09:53 +0000

81 lines

Re: ODB++ to gerber?

Dave Elder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:50:27 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:33:41 -0500

59 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:43:52 -0400

75 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:56:29 -0400

85 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:56:47 -0400

99 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:00:17 -0400

125 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:10:49 -0500

134 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:35:17 +0100

75 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:47:45 -0400

153 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:45:34 -0400

179 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:14:07 -0400

198 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:03:27 -0500

218 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:04:55 -0400

247 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:18:07 -0500

287 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:23:39 -0500

292 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:34:17 -0400

229 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:40:42 +0000

167 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:46:12 -0400

327 lines

Re: Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:39:24 -0400

350 lines

New Thread

R: [TN] BGA Rework reflow Profile

R: [TN] BGA Rework reflow Profile

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:02:17 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Requirements for Dry Cabinet

Requirements for Dry Cabinet

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 18:37:55 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

SAC 305 etch

SAC 305 etch

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:53:09 -0700

21 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

Giamis, Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:56:30 -0500

41 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:19:55 -0400

99 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:29:09 +0000

54 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

Stewart McCracken <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:48:46 +0000

37 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:37:33 +0100

48 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:20:05 -0700

78 lines

Re: SAC 305 etch

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:43:54 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Solder Mask sensitivity to environment

Solder Mask sensitivity to environment

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:10:07 -0500

25 lines

Re: Solder Mask sensitivity to environment

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 10:08:46 -0700

64 lines

New Thread

solder mask thickness

solder mask thickness

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:31:49 -0600

25 lines

Re: solder mask thickness

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:54:29 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:53:54 -0400

31 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:07:02 +0000

47 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:01:19 -0400

102 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:59:04 -0500

32 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:05:42 -0400

49 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:12:47 -0700

56 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:33:39 +0000

85 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:36:56 +0000

120 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:17:49 -0500

27 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:23:22 -0500

25 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:30:59 +0000

109 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:28:44 -0500

148 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:11:00 -0500

38 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:54:28 -0400

155 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:10:47 +0000

129 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:29:43 +0000

145 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:18:27 -0500

205 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:27:53 -0500

31 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:33:00 -0500

156 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Bush, Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:32:40 -0400

52 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:17:52 -0500

192 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Nutting, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:37:40 +0000

214 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:41:44 +0000

77 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Nutting, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:13:11 +0000

263 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Robert Wolfe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:12:28 -0400

254 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:39:35 -0700

265 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:55:13 -0500

265 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:48:56 +0000

292 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 03:07:19 +0000

83 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:25:42 +0000

137 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:25:42 +0000

142 lines

Re: Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:31:52 -0400

154 lines

New Thread

solder which does ot scavenge gold

solder which does ot scavenge gold

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:27:34 -0400

51 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:45:43 -0500

98 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:47:16 +0000

72 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:49:12 +0000

85 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:51:36 -0500

27 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:52:59 +0000

110 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:52:55 +0000

146 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:17:06 -0500

137 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:57:22 -0400

119 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:05:11 +0000

154 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:50:25 -0700

96 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:55:34 +0000

204 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:37:43 -0700

225 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:43:17 -0400

165 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:49:07 +0100

66 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:05:51 +0100

204 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:34:30 +0200

258 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:37:12 +0200

286 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:43:35 -0400

261 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 22:13:45 +0200

289 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:10:30 -0400

299 lines

Re: solder which does ot scavenge gold

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:49:09 -0400

335 lines

New Thread

SOLDERMASK THICKNESS FOR SPRAY COATED MACHINE

SOLDERMASK THICKNESS FOR SPRAY COATED MACHINE

Ramakrishnan Saravanan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:19:45 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

Tape test

Tape test

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:33:25 +0000

37 lines

Re: Tape test

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:48:56 -0500

71 lines

Re: Tape test

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:01:44 -0400

62 lines

Re: Tape test

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:41:46 -0500

95 lines

Re: Tape test

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:28:47 +0000

99 lines

Re: Tape test

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:07:26 +0100

55 lines

Re: Tape test

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:11:25 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Thin Film Measurement

Thin Film Measurement

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:31:03 -0400

25 lines

Re: Thin Film Measurement

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:06:49 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

To characterize or not

To characterize or not

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:40:12 +0100

51 lines

Re: To characterize or not

Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 03:11:51 -0400

77 lines

Re: To characterize or not

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:45:05 -0400

112 lines

Re: To characterize or not

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:00:41 +0000

123 lines

Re: To characterize or not

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:21:47 +0100

151 lines

Re: To characterize or not

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:11:52 -0400

142 lines

New Thread

Wed Whisker call in

Wed Whisker call in

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:01:45 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Which ESD Standard

Which ESD Standard

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 06:57:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:51:58 -0400

50 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:53:49 -0500

66 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:15:48 +0000

120 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:20:45 -0500

141 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:46:17 -0500

63 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:08:45 -0500

86 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:36:43 -0500

135 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:45:30 +0000

154 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:58:56 +0000

159 lines

Re: Which ESD Standard

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:39:55 -0400

105 lines

New Thread

x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:54:05 -0700

44 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:04:20 -0500

62 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:22:53 -0500

35 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:43:19 +0000

69 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:47:15 +0000

86 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:49:56 +0000

49 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:17:12 +0000

63 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:21:09 +0000

78 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:35:04 +0000

77 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:42:52 +0000

114 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:47:57 -0700

104 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:31:03 +0000

107 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:35:11 +0000

125 lines

Re: x-ray inspection of PTH barrel fill

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:44:55 +0000

143 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager