LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


December 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

´ð¸´: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue (1 message)
ç­å¤: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue (1 message)
答复: Re: [TN] 答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue (1 message)
答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue (4 messages)
0.051mm (2mil) cores (1 message)
??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open is sue (1 message)
??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue (7 messages)
A New Year's Resolution... (1 message)
Alumina Substrate (15 messages)
AW: [TN] AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints (1 message)
AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints (3 messages)
axial lead bend (10 messages)
Bernard Madoff NTC (1 message)
BGA soldering open issue (7 messages)
Board House recommendation (2 messages)
Cold Forged Alunium (CFA), Cross section-grain structure (3 messages)
Compliant Pin Insertion Machines (2 messages)
Conductive Epoxy filled Vias (12 messages)
Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents (13 messages)
DC IN connector plating (1 message)
Draft for IPC-4101C (1 message)
ENIG thickness measurement (2 messages)
flux and board cleaning issues (28 messages)
Fw: X'mas venture (1 message)
Fwd: Draft for IPC-4101C (3 messages)
Holiday Eating Guide (3 messages)
Immersion Tin (5 messages)
IPC-6012 Class 3 - Electrical Test Requirement (2 messages)
IPC/JEDEC Upcoming Lead-Free Event - 03/3-5/2009 Santa Clara, Calf. (1 message)
Last chance to register for IPC/JEDEC's Lead Free Conference December 8-10, 2008 (1 message)
Lead free soldering (3 messages)
Materials (1 message)
Multilayer construction (5 messages)
My apologies (4 messages)
nickel erosion (1 message)
NORAD (2 messages)
NTC Christmas Greetings (1 message)
NTC Engineers! (3 messages)
NTC Re: [TN] Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue (1 message)
NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate (10 messages)
NTC [TN] Materials (2 messages)
NTC [TN] Stripping Magnet Wire (1 message)
NTC [TN] Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape (2 messages)
OT Friday newsflash (4 messages)
Plated Copper Dissolution at the Knee/Lead Free Soldering (3 messages)
POP underfill? (6 messages)
QUESTION ON GULL WING COMPONENT LEAD CONFIGURATION ANOMALY (2 messages)
RE: Xbox360 BGA issue (3 messages)
RF PCB for high frequency (3 messages)
SCreswick@Gentex Signing Off (4 messages)
Season's Greetings (7 messages)
set technet noemail (3 messages)
Shorts in flex, (3 messages)
Solder mask removal (10 messages)
Step Stencil Requirements (1 message)
Stripping Magnet Wire (11 messages)
TechNet Digest - 22 Dec 2008 to 23 Dec 2008 (#2008-350) (1 message)
test post NTC (1 message)
Tin Pest (3 messages)
to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not? (7 messages)
Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue (18 messages)
Unsubscribe (1 message)
vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints (4 messages)
Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape (7 messages)
What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits? (12 messages)
What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time? (16 messages)
x-outs in panel (6 messages)
Xbox360 BGA issue (1 message)
Xbox360 BGAs (24 messages)
Xbox360 BGAs NTC (6 messages)
Xbox360s (4 messages)
[LF] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

´ð¸´: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Re: ´ð¸´: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:18:52 +0000

158 lines

New Thread

ç­å¤: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Re: ç­å¤: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:43:57 +0000

438 lines

New Thread

答复: Re: [TN] 答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

答复: Re: [TN] 答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Cong He <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:32:59 +0800

155 lines

New Thread

答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Cong He <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:08:14 +0800

79 lines

Re: 答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:14:14 -0500

191 lines

Re: 答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:11:25 -0500

430 lines

Re: 答复: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:25:38 -0500

524 lines

New Thread

0.051mm (2mil) cores

0.051mm (2mil) cores

Dougal Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:38:22 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open is sue

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open is sue

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:41:56 -0800

255 lines

New Thread

??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:25:02 -0600

151 lines

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:40:37 +0000

451 lines

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:37:01 EST

24 lines

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:32:51 -0600

52 lines

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:41:48 -0600

74 lines

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:50:45 -0600

56 lines

Re: ??: Re: [TN] BGA soldering open issue

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:28:19 -0500

141 lines

New Thread

A New Year's Resolution...

A New Year's Resolution...

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:10:29 EST

78 lines

New Thread

Alumina Substrate

Alumina Substrate

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:56:45 -0500

38 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:47:39 -0600

66 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:51:18 -0600

78 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:53:08 -0500

91 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:53:43 +0100

63 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:57:48 +0100

63 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:59:01 -0500

105 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:19:15 +0100

123 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:19:49 +0100

126 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:54:15 -0500

125 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500

163 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:26:26 -0500

93 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:39:44 -0500

125 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:52:58 -0600

151 lines

Re: Alumina Substrate

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:49:05 -0800

153 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Jeremias, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:16:04 +0100

258 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Jeremias, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:20:08 +0100

115 lines

AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Jeremias, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:03:08 +0100

198 lines

Re: AW: [TN] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:14:48 -0500

226 lines

New Thread

axial lead bend

axial lead bend

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:13:37 -0600

31 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:21:52 -0400

67 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:28:23 -0500

76 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:29:38 -0600

69 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:36:27 -0600

97 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:37:10 -0600

55 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:25:49 -0800

59 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:27:55 -0800

87 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:31:37 -0800

119 lines

Re: axial lead bend

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:29:08 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Bernard Madoff NTC

Bernard Madoff NTC

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:20:31 EST

25 lines

New Thread

BGA soldering open issue

BGA soldering open issue

Cong He <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:08:37 +0800

37 lines

Re: BGA soldering open issue

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 21:57:25 -0500

62 lines

Re: BGA soldering open issue

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:07:33 -0800

94 lines

Re: BGA soldering open issue

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:31:18 -0600

86 lines

Re: BGA soldering open issue

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:09:34 +0000

62 lines

Re: BGA soldering open issue

Cong He <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:18:12 +0800

56 lines

Re: BGA soldering open issue

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:04:51 -0500

469 lines

New Thread

Board House recommendation

Board House recommendation

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:44:07 -0500

48 lines

Re: Board House recommendation

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:10:51 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

Cold Forged Alunium (CFA), Cross section-grain structure

Cold Forged Alunium (CFA), Cross section-grain structure

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:49:43 -0600

39 lines

Re: Cold Forged Alunium (CFA), Cross section-grain structure

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:23:02 -0600

91 lines

Re: Cold Forged Alunium (CFA), Cross section-grain structure

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:20 -0600

125 lines

New Thread

Compliant Pin Insertion Machines

Compliant Pin Insertion Machines

Brian Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:28:44 -0600

28 lines

Re: Compliant Pin Insertion Machines

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:47:28 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Dave Connitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:07:27 -0500

40 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:16:18 -0500

75 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:31:48 -0500

78 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Dave Connitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:55:35 -0500

87 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Dave Connitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:01:25 -0500

104 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:38:10 -0500

150 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Haynes, Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:56:39 -0600

148 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:05:44 -0500

142 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:57:46 -0600

34 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:25:15 -0500

93 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:30:52 -0700

121 lines

Re: Conductive Epoxy filled Vias

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:20:43 -0500

144 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:18:39 -0600

33 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:27:41 -0600

72 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:45:23 -0700

62 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:48:16 -0600

84 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:59:20 -0500

109 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:58:35 -0500

142 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:59:57 -0600

149 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:28:32 +0000

102 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:20:41 +0000

83 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:27:03 -0500

118 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:59:18 -0700

152 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:37:57 -0800

179 lines

Re: Conformal Coat and Eddy Currents

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:20:50 -0700

194 lines

New Thread

DC IN connector plating

DC IN connector plating

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:11:15 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Draft for IPC-4101C

Draft for IPC-4101C

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:33:43 EST

56 lines

New Thread

ENIG thickness measurement

ENIG thickness measurement

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:14:41 -0500

37 lines

Re: ENIG thickness measurement

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:30:04 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

flux and board cleaning issues

flux and board cleaning issues

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:55:02 -0800

46 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:04:18 -0800

73 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:12:19 -0800

104 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:48:03 -0500

137 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:12:03 +0200

66 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:15:15 -0500

144 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:41:46 -0500

174 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:43:46 -0600

102 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:16:54 -0500

171 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:41:39 -0600

36 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:03:57 -0500

66 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:32:32 -0800

259 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:47:51 -0500

217 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:20:46 -0800

192 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Terry L. Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:28:03 -0500

315 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Andy Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:09:00 -0800

280 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:32:32 -0800

332 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:54:39 +0200

214 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:34:27 -0600

372 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:46:59 -0600

255 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:10:06 -0600

361 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:01:22 -0500

252 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:05:56 -0500

265 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:17:15 EST

42 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:30:09 -0800

248 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:00:59 -0600

320 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:18:28 -0800

318 lines

Re: flux and board cleaning issues

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:53:38 -0800

460 lines

New Thread

Fw: X'mas venture

Fw: X'mas venture

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:35:38 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Draft for IPC-4101C

Fwd: Draft for IPC-4101C

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:11:05 -0500

284 lines

Re: Fwd: Draft for IPC-4101C

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:45:07 +0100

349 lines

Re: Fwd: Draft for IPC-4101C

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:33:18 -0500

753 lines

New Thread

Holiday Eating Guide

Holiday Eating Guide

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:26:59 -0800

91 lines

Re: Holiday Eating Guide

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:47:54 -0500

128 lines

Re: Holiday Eating Guide

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:20:51 -0600

158 lines

New Thread

Immersion Tin

Immersion Tin

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:24:46 -0500

112 lines

Re: Immersion Tin

<Richard Edgar> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:07:17 -0500

150 lines

Re: Immersion Tin

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:34:29 -0500

193 lines

Re: Immersion Tin

<Richard Edgar> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:02:23 EST

28 lines

Re: Immersion Tin

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:05:26 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

IPC-6012 Class 3 - Electrical Test Requirement

IPC-6012 Class 3 - Electrical Test Requirement

roland jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:56:14 +0100

54 lines

Re: IPC-6012 Class 3 - Electrical Test Requirement

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:24:02 -0000

125 lines

New Thread

IPC/JEDEC Upcoming Lead-Free Event - 03/3-5/2009 Santa Clara, Calf.

IPC/JEDEC Upcoming Lead-Free Event - 03/3-5/2009 Santa Clara, Calf.

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:27:52 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

Last chance to register for IPC/JEDEC's Lead Free Conference December 8-10, 2008

Last chance to register for IPC/JEDEC's Lead Free Conference December 8-10, 2008

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:33:26 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Lead free soldering

Lead free soldering

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:57:47 -0600

49 lines

Re: Lead free soldering

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:31:46 -0500

100 lines

Re: Lead free soldering

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:16:57 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Materials

Materials

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:04:58 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Multilayer construction

Multilayer construction

SAHLI habib <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:40:26 +0100

30 lines

Re: Multilayer construction

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:42:56 -0000

74 lines

Re: Multilayer construction

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:49:05 -0500

70 lines

Re: Multilayer construction

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:05:40 -0800

81 lines

Re: Multilayer construction

SAHLI habib <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:29:11 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

My apologies

My apologies

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:32:28 -0600

43 lines

Re: My apologies

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:34:04 EST

70 lines

Re: My apologies

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:40:19 -0700

73 lines

Re: My apologies

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:45:16 -0600

100 lines

New Thread

nickel erosion

Re: nickel erosion

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:29:19 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

NORAD

NORAD

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:31:52 -0500

52 lines

Re: NORAD

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:41:12 -0800

72 lines

New Thread

NTC Christmas Greetings

NTC Christmas Greetings

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:29:06 -0600

46 lines

New Thread

NTC Engineers!

NTC Engineers!

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:04:27 +0200

214 lines

Re: NTC Engineers!

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:43:41 -0600

28 lines

Re: NTC Engineers!

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:51:01 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

NTC Re: [TN] Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

NTC Re: [TN] Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:04:44 -0500

190 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:15:06 -0800

117 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:43:03 +0100

138 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:07:24 -0700

154 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 16:25:11 EST

182 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Nick Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:27:54 -0600

177 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:31:49 -0700

226 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Nick Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:40:13 -0600

250 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:12:52 -0800

276 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:44:30 -0500

319 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Alumina Substrate

Nick Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:44:45 -0600

285 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Materials

Re: NTC [TN] Materials

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:37:52 -0800

67 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Materials

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:15:49 -0600

109 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Stripping Magnet Wire

Re: NTC [TN] Stripping Magnet Wire

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:37:16 -0800

212 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Re: NTC [TN] Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:39:14 -0800

202 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Michael Kirschner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:08:38 -0600

287 lines

New Thread

OT Friday newsflash

OT Friday newsflash

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:18:52 +0200

121 lines

Re: OT Friday newsflash

kwood716 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:07:56 -0500

148 lines

Re: OT Friday newsflash

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:29:56 -0500

171 lines

Re: OT Friday newsflash

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:23:11 -0800

177 lines

New Thread

Plated Copper Dissolution at the Knee/Lead Free Soldering

Plated Copper Dissolution at the Knee/Lead Free Soldering

Kim O'Neil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:24:14 -0700

32 lines

Re: Plated Copper Dissolution at the Knee/Lead Free Soldering

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:45:57 -0600

66 lines

Re: Plated Copper Dissolution at the Knee/Lead Free Soldering

Bobwillis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:22:31 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

POP underfill?

POP underfill?

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:04:07 -0800

36 lines

Re: POP underfill?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:41:52 -0000

72 lines

Re: POP underfill?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:49:42 -0500

117 lines

Re: POP underfill?

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:44:12 -0800

124 lines

Re: POP underfill?

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:54:20 -0500

191 lines

Re: POP underfill?

Bobwillis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:22:27 -0500

198 lines

New Thread

QUESTION ON GULL WING COMPONENT LEAD CONFIGURATION ANOMALY

QUESTION ON GULL WING COMPONENT LEAD CONFIGURATION ANOMALY

Roberts, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:48:32 -0600

61 lines

Re: QUESTION ON GULL WING COMPONENT LEAD CONFIGURATION ANOMALY

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:52:15 -0700

90 lines

New Thread

RE: Xbox360 BGA issue

Re: RE: Xbox360 BGA issue

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:12:05 -0600

66 lines

Re: RE: Xbox360 BGA issue

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:02:05 -0500

60 lines

Re: RE: Xbox360 BGA issue

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:56:24 -0600

115 lines

New Thread

RF PCB for high frequency

RF PCB for high frequency

Anat Douek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:30:27 +0200

24 lines

Re: RF PCB for high frequency

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:52:56 -0800

55 lines

Re: RF PCB for high frequency

Joetech82 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:56:22 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

SCreswick@Gentex Signing Off

SCreswick@Gentex Signing Off

Steve Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:41:07 -0500

50 lines

Re: SCreswick@Gentex Signing Off

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500

81 lines

Re: SCreswick@Gentex Signing Off

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:50:59 -0600

86 lines

Re: SCreswick@Gentex Signing Off

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:12:43 -0800

78 lines

New Thread

Season's Greetings

Season's Greetings

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:34:57 +0200

35 lines

Re: Season's Greetings

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:43:18 -0500

60 lines

Re: Season's Greetings

roland jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:37:09 +0100

78 lines

Re: Season's Greetings

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:27:15 -0600

61 lines

Re: Season's Greetings

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:04:11 -0800

65 lines

Re: Season's Greetings

Steve Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:30:30 -0500

46 lines

Re: Season's Greetings

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:46:32 +0800

29 lines

New Thread

set technet noemail

set technet noemail

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:21:26 -0600

33 lines

Re: set technet noemail

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:27:57 -0600

60 lines

Re: set technet noemail

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:32:19 -0600

46 lines

New Thread

Shorts in flex,

Shorts in flex,

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:02:47 -0500

76 lines

Re: Shorts in flex,

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:11:06 -0500

117 lines

Re: Shorts in flex,

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:06:42 -0500

140 lines

New Thread

Solder mask removal

Solder mask removal

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:33:26 -0800

31 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:44:57 -0600

67 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:04:50 -0600

76 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:06:04 -0800

63 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:22:01 -0700

108 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Andy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:20:31 -0500

80 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:33:11 -0500

63 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:14:55 -0500

96 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:15:39 -0800

60 lines

Re: Solder mask removal

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:58:43 -0800

106 lines

New Thread

Step Stencil Requirements

Re: Step Stencil Requirements

Mark C. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:45:56 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Stripping Magnet Wire

Stripping Magnet Wire

Kane, Joseph E (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:28:19 -0500

32 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Schaefer, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:13:52 -0600

73 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:16:55 -0600

100 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:30:17 -0800

60 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:56:39 -0500

98 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Diamond, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:14:19 -0000

73 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:51:09 -0800

128 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:25:49 EST

145 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:11:15 -0800

195 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:29:31 -0800

206 lines

Re: Stripping Magnet Wire

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:37:41 EST

210 lines

New Thread

TechNet Digest - 22 Dec 2008 to 23 Dec 2008 (#2008-350)

Re: TechNet Digest - 22 Dec 2008 to 23 Dec 2008 (#2008-350)

Paul Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:26:30 -0000

29 lines

New Thread

test post NTC

test post NTC

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:35:14 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Tin Pest

Tin Pest

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:14:44 -0000

63 lines

Re: Tin Pest

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:20:49 -0600

116 lines

Re: Tin Pest

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:38:53 -0000

188 lines

New Thread

to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:43:55 -0500

63 lines

Re: to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:38:16 -0500

116 lines

Re: to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:28:13 -0500

87 lines

Re: to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:33:27 -0500

422 lines

Re: to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:07:06 -0500

633 lines

Re: to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:54:36 -0500

232 lines

Re: to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:13:00 -0500

582 lines

New Thread

Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:02:18 -0800

65 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:34:05 -0500

101 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:12:30 -0500

100 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:15:37 -0500

132 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:33:50 -0800

154 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:33:05 -0800

131 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:43:46 -0500

132 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:54:57 -0600

125 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:14:58 -0600

130 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:45:53 -0800

37 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:43:37 -0500

84 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:18:26 -0600

109 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:38:02 -0800

145 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:40:35 -0800

151 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:17:00 -0800

110 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:28:51 -0800

63 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:32:26 -0800

203 lines

Re: Underfill, inhibition due to leftover activators in the flux residue

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:02:58 -0500

122 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Bob Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:48:39 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:45:22 EST

42 lines

Re: Vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:01:14 EST

34 lines

Re: vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:32:25 -0800

172 lines

Re: vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Haynes, Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:29:45 -0600

197 lines

New Thread

Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:04:05 -0600

40 lines

Re: Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:07:23 -0500

82 lines

Re: Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Simonik, Dave R. (David) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:28:03 -0500

194 lines

Re: Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Bill Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:55:15 -0600

171 lines

Re: Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:06:04 -0500

214 lines

Re: Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:30:23 +0100

198 lines

Re: Way off-topic: CrO2 cassette tape

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:15:12 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:51:34 +0000

53 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:47:03 -0500

86 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Andy Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:17:20 -0800

107 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:51:37 +0000

111 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Andy Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:29:30 -0800

152 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 06:41:15 +0000

151 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:19:29 -0600

213 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:47:34 -0500

105 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Andy Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:06:30 -0800

71 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Jason Zhao <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:22:42 -0600

125 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:22:49 -0600

121 lines

Re: What are the industrial standards for Solder paste printing limits?

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:38:17 +0800

175 lines

New Thread

What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:34:59 +0000

55 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:43:23 -0500

92 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:50:13 -0500

113 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:56:01 +0000

85 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:16:35 -0800

155 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:22:42 -0600

111 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:25:44 -0600

176 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:46:03 -0800

118 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:20:40 -0500

91 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:18:22 -0500

119 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:37:49 -0500

153 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:11:56 -0500

177 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:22:28 -0500

149 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:38:22 -0600

208 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:33:55 -0500

86 lines

Re: What could be the root cause for a failed board that passed functiona test after going through reflow for the 2nd time?

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:05:34 -0600

138 lines

New Thread

x-outs in panel

Re: x-outs in panel

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:57:59 -0800

48 lines

x-outs in panel

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:47:05 -0800

54 lines

Re: x-outs in panel

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:31:10 -0500

86 lines

Re: x-outs in panel

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:03:05 -0800

86 lines

Re: x-outs in panel

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:03:45 -0600

34 lines

Re: x-outs in panel

Wolfgang Erat <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:52:13 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Xbox360 BGA issue

RE: Xbox360 BGA issue

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:03:08 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Xbox360 BGAs

Xbox360 BGAs

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Dec 2008 22:38:22 -0600

98 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Terry Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Dec 2008 07:26:20 -0700

125 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Oscar Fallah <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:59:16 -0800

127 lines

Xbox360 BGAs

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:17:47 -0600

103 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:44:19 +0000

123 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:27:48 EST

161 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:35:48 -0500

156 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:20:33 -0600

241 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:00:59 -0500

237 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:57:03 -0500

201 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:30:02 -0500

234 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:56:59 -0500

286 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 21:11:29 -0500

318 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:50:27 -0500

372 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:26:20 -0500

423 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:59:18 -0500

465 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:21:26 -0500

500 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:26:25 -0500

2314 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:05:09 -0500

2366 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:42:33 -0500

134 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:26:54 -0500

173 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:59:28 -0500

72 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:17:17 -0600

31 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs

Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:14:53 -0500

2400 lines

New Thread

Xbox360 BGAs NTC

Re: Xbox360 BGAs NTC

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:36:23 -0000

466 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs NTC

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:07:56 -0600

524 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs NTC

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:14:44 -0800

508 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs NTC

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:27:44 -0500

542 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs NTC

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:38:05 -0600

583 lines

Re: Xbox360 BGAs NTC

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:52:08 -0500

510 lines

New Thread

Xbox360s

Xbox360s

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:51:05 -0600

109 lines

Re: Xbox360s

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:33:50 -0800

167 lines

Re: Xbox360s

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:54:20 -0800

205 lines

Re: Xbox360s

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:39:11 EST

38 lines

New Thread

[LF] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Re: [LF] vibration testing of tin-lead and lead-free solder joints

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:03:35 EST

210 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager