LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


May 2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"X" out boards (5 messages)
(TN) IPC-A-610C/Solder ball (1 message)
: DataPaq Miniflow System (1 message)
: Solder Peaks (1 message)
<No subject> (4 messages)
ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION (6 messages)
Adhesive for Bottom Side (7 messages)
Altera BGA Reflow Problem (2 messages)
Announcement for College course for operators (1 message)
Antw: Re: [TN] Black Pad (1 message)
Antw: Re: [TN] COST (AUST $)EXT. COST (2 messages)
Antw: Re: [TN] Sales Director (1 message)
Antw: [TN] Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling... (2 messages)
Antw: [TN] High G PBAs (1 message)
Antw: [TN] Lead - free updates (1 message)
Antw: [TN] MSD's (3 messages)
Antw: [TN] Removing epoxy encapsulation (1 message)
Antw: [TN] Removing Epoxy Encapsulation... (1 message)
Antw: [TN] voids in BGA (2 messages)
Antw: [TN] white residues after cleaning (1 message)
Antwort: [TN] Altera BGA Reflow Problem (2 messages)
AOI (4 messages)
Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling... (9 messages)
Assembly Incoming Inspection Cleanliness Standards (3 messages)
Assembly pre-heat ramp-up rate (1 message)
AW: [TN] Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH (1 message)
AW: [TN] IST - what is it? (2 messages)
AW: [TN] Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes) (2 messages)
AW: [TN] NTC - Graham Naisbitt (1 message)
AW: [TN] Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II (3 messages)
AW: [TN] Re-ball BGA (2 messages)
Bareboard Capacitance Testing (2 messages)
Bent leads (3 messages)
Best Value CCD camera (2 messages)
BGA (4 messages)
BGA Design (6 messages)
BGA Pad repair (2 messages)
BGA solderball anomaly (1 message)
BGA's failure during rework process. (4 messages)
Black Pad (9 messages)
Blackhole problems (1 message)
Blind and burried Via's (2 messages)
Calling Underfill Users (2 messages)
Cleaner/Degreaser (5 messages)
Cobalt or Nickel hardened gold? (3 messages)
Component Failure Temperatures (4 messages)
Component identification (6 messages)
conductive epoxy prepreg (8 messages)
Conductive Paint...... (5 messages)
Conductivity or Resistivity? (2 messages)
Conformal Coating Service (2 messages)
Conformal Coating Wicking (8 messages)
Conformal Coating Wicking plus NTC (2 messages)
Controlled Impedance (6 messages)
Copper roll clad PVC laminate material for flexible circuits (1 message)
COST (AUST $)EXT. COST (2 messages)
Cotton Gloves/Finger Cots (3 messages)
Cpk study (3 messages)
cyanite ester (1 message)
D-SUB CONNECTOR, PCB MOUNT FOR REFLOW PROCESS (1 message)
Data Collections (2 messages)
Data conversion (2 messages)
Depaneling Standard (3 messages)
Differential impedance prediction on woven glass reinforced substrates. (1 message)
Dinosaur wind (1 message)
Discoloration of LPI solder mask (4 messages)
Dress Code (8 messages)
Dumb question (6 messages)
Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold (4 messages)
Engineering SERVING (2 messages)
ENIG in flex layers (7 messages)
epoxy B encapulation (1 message)
Epoxy encapsulation (1 message)
Equivalent BS specs (1 message)
ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags (11 messages)
Evaluating Solder Pastes (1 message)
Exposure frame (1 message)
extractable ionic content determination (5 messages)
Fiducials (5 messages)
First Article Software (1 message)
Fixed Carbon Resistors (4 messages)
Flex Material (4 messages)
Flying probe test? (4 messages)
FW: Mail System Error - Returned Mail (1 message)
Fw: Reliability of exposed copper (1 message)
FW: [TN] Sales Director (2 messages)
Gold embrittlement (4 messages)
HASL can the height be controlled? (8 messages)
HASL Height . . . (1 message)
Help with Fuji CP2"s (4 messages)
High End PCB facility (1 message)
High Freq and OSP Coated Boards (4 messages)
High G PBAs (2 messages)
High quality PWB prototype house (2 messages)
Humidity (3 messages)
IC test labs (1 message)
ICT after double sided reflow (3 messages)
Immersion silver boards tarnish (1 message)
Inspection (12 messages)
INSPECTION OF STENCILS (1 message)
Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH (2 messages)
Intrusive Soldering Reliability (2 messages)
Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized compon ents (3 messages)
Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components (8 messages)
Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcompone nts (1 message)
Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcomponents (3 messages)
Ionic Testing (2 messages)
IPC 610 question (1 message)
IPC land to lead fillet requirements (3 messages)
IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs? (5 messages)
IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion (5 messages)
IPC-SM-785 (1 message)
ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process M ea s urements" (1 message)
ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process M eas urements" (1 message)
ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements" (5 messages)
ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Measurements" (1 message)
IST - what is it? (4 messages)
IST Coupons (2 messages)
Just a tip: Topline clipart now for free (3 messages)
Last Call for Papers for IPC Annual Meeting Tech Conference (1 message)
Lead - free updates (1 message)
Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes) (3 messages)
looking for a us board vendor doing micro vias (1 message)
Looking for US board vendors doing microvias (1 message)
low foaming water sol. solder mask? (5 messages)
LPI in holes (1 message)
LPI Soldermask Removal (6 messages)
Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc is out of the office. (1 message)
Minimum Operating Temp of FR4 (1 message)
Moisture Barrier Bag WVTR (1 message)
Moisture Indicator For Assembled Electronic Products (1 message)
Moisture Sensitive Components (12 messages)
More on Quad pick and place (3 messages)
MSD's (1 message)
NA Testing (2 messages)
Need Help On PCB Finish (4 messages)
New additional Information (1 message)
No technical content...Earthquakes in OK? (8 messages)
No technical content...really, no technical content at all. (1 message)
No technical content? (1 message)
No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread (5 messages)
No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread (5 messages)
No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting? (5 messages)
NON EUTECTIC balls (1 message)
Now its time to say goodbye to all our family........... (3 messages)
NTC (3 messages)
NTC - Graham Naisbitt (1 message)
NTC Global warming (8 messages)
NTC Global warming/environmental quallity (2 messages)
NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termina tion... (2 messages)
NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termination... (2 messages)
NTC warming (1 message)
NTC warming/duststorm (2 messages)
NTC!!! Technet listserv etiquette (2 messages)
NTC!!!!!!!!! (5 messages)
NTC...Bev Christian (1 message)
NTC? I beg to differ! (1 message)
Omikron white tin (3 messages)
One more reference on reliability of exposed copper... (1 message)
outside source for AOI (2 messages)
Package reliabilty... (5 messages)
Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II (4 messages)
PCB Inspection Service (1 message)
PCB paladium plating (3 messages)
Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators? (20 messages)
Physical work instructions (2 messages)
Pick&place of white coil (7 messages)
Plasma Etch parameters (1 message)
Plating up Gold Tabs (5 messages)
poster (5 messages)
Process control for cleaning (4 messages)
Purchasing NUVISIONS Manufacturing (2 messages)
Pure Tin (7 messages)
Pure Tin, Poor Tin (2 messages)
PWB Testing (2 messages)
Quad (2 messages)
Quad Pick & Place (2 messages)
Re-ball BGA (4 messages)
Recall: Water soluble fluxes! (1 message)
Recovery Time of Iron tips (2 messages)
Ref Des Letter??? (3 messages)
Removing epoxy encapsulation (10 messages)
Removing Epoxy Encapsulation... (5 messages)
REQUEST IPC-A-610 (2 messages)
Resolution of Tunnel diode problem... (1 message)
Rework Wires and OA Flux (16 messages)
RivScrew for Assembly (4 messages)
round vs. square (1 message)
RV: SALES DIRECTOR (2 messages)
Sales Director (14 messages)
Salvage the Aged (8 messages)
Salvage the Aged-no technical content (2 messages)
Salvage the Aged... (1 message)
Salvage the cows (OT) (1 message)
SCORING TEFLON BOARDS (4 messages)
Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly) (5 messages)
Seeing Stars...a picture is up. (2 messages)
Semicon photos (4 messages)
SET TechNet MAIL (1 message)
Silkscreen issue (1 message)
SIR Definition (1 message)
Size?: 24 x (1 message)
Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's (3 messages)
Sn whisker problem (7 messages)
Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic) (7 messages)
Software (4 messages)
Solder Iron Heat Recovery Measurement (4 messages)
Solder Mask Material... (2 messages)
Solder Peaks... (3 messages)
Solder Pot Analysis (5 messages)
Solder Rework using IMpcb Board Material (1 message)
Solder Technology International Webpage (7 messages)
Solder Voiding (5 messages)
solder wick, no-clean vs. no-flux (2 messages)
Soldering batteries on boards (4 messages)
solithane conf. coat (5 messages)
some technical content, but not much (2 messages)
SOT23 opens & DOE Test board layout. (4 messages)
SPC for PCB (3 messages)
SPC Pick n' Place (4 messages)
Standard for Crimpng connectors (2 messages)
subContractors (1 message)
Surface Finish for 1.27mm PBGA (2 messages)
T&B Connector (4 messages)
Technet Listserv Etiquette (2 messages)
TechNet Police (1 message)
Temperature cycling specification (3 messages)
Test - please ignore (1 message)
The alter ego..... (2 messages)
thermo relief in conductor planes (3 messages)
this message text (1 message)
Tin (2 messages)
Tin article (1 message)
Tin Whiskers (1 message)
Tin whiskers 2 (1 message)
Tin whiskers on a capacitor termination... (1 message)
Typical DPMO for uBGA (1 message)
Unusual Cleaning Operation- Help! (7 messages)
V-scoring depth tolerance. (2 messages)
Via elect parameters (1 message)
Vibration on Raised Floor (4 messages)
VIGON Solvent Cleaning of Populated Boards (1 message)
VIRUS ALLERT!!!! (1 message)
Water soluble fluxes! (3 messages)
Weak solderJoint - Part easily peel-off on Ni200 material (3 messages)
Weight Gain Testing (5 messages)
What do companies do with pcb bits after they are not usable? (1 message)
What is the going price companies buy your tugnsten carbide scrap? (1 message)
Which Solder Mask (4 messages)
White Residue (1 message)
white residues after cleaning (13 messages)
work in progress software (3 messages)
Ya' need to share images? (3 messages)
[IPC-600-6012] Annular Ring Breakout for PTV's (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:53:27 EDT

58 lines

Re:

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:03:27 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

"X" out boards

"X" out boards

Larry Koens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:05:56 -0500

28 lines

Re: "X" out boards

Mauricio Castro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:55:23 -0500

47 lines

Re: "X" out boards

Kathy Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 14:33:17 -0700

49 lines

Re: "X" out boards

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 16:37:20 -0500

49 lines

Re: "X" out boards

Mike Trammel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 17:54:54 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

(TN) IPC-A-610C/Solder ball

(TN) IPC-A-610C/Solder ball

Nguyen Quoc Khanh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 09:21:48 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

: DataPaq Miniflow System

: DataPaq Miniflow System

Kasprzak, Bill (sys) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:49:54 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

: Solder Peaks

Re: : Solder Peaks

Hollandsworth, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 09:17:08 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Mengers, William D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:08:39 -0400

36 lines

<No subject>

E. SUDHAKARAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 19:23:00 +0530

60 lines

<No subject>

Jean-Luc Lehmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 16:24:47 +0200

28 lines

<No subject>

Grant Emandien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 09:00:17 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 07:37:55 -0400

30 lines

Re: ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 07:23:58 -0500

27 lines

Re: ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:02:56 -0400

161 lines

Re: ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:38:00 -0700

47 lines

Re: ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 22:32:41 +0100

76 lines

Re: ACRYLIC CONFORMAL COATING CLEANING SOLUTION

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 May 2001 04:17:26 EDT

22 lines

New Thread

Adhesive for Bottom Side

Adhesive for Bottom Side

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 19:43:41 -0500

78 lines

Re: Adhesive for Bottom Side

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 21:23:55 EDT

56 lines

Re: Adhesive for Bottom Side

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 11:28:15 +0800

89 lines

Re: Adhesive for Bottom Side

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 09:34:25 +0200

45 lines

Re: Adhesive for Bottom Side

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 08:28:32 -0400

119 lines

Re: Adhesive for Bottom Side

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 08:25:59 -0500

58 lines

Re: Adhesive for Bottom Side

Jorge Santana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 11:28:20 -0500

187 lines

New Thread

Altera BGA Reflow Problem

Altera BGA Reflow Problem

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 09:19:18 -0700

50 lines

Re: Altera BGA Reflow Problem

Francois Monette <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 13:55:57 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

Announcement for College course for operators

Announcement for College course for operators

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 14:06:54 -0500

247 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: [TN] Black Pad

Antw: Re: [TN] Black Pad

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 09:56:53 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: [TN] COST (AUST $)EXT. COST

Antw: Re: [TN] COST (AUST $)EXT. COST

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 14:14:51 +0200

37 lines

Re: Antw: Re: [TN] COST (AUST $)EXT. COST

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 08:44:49 EDT

87 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: [TN] Sales Director

Antw: Re: [TN] Sales Director

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 14:04:27 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Antw: [TN] Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 10:19:04 +0200

49 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 09:16:48 -0400

81 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] High G PBAs

Antw: [TN] High G PBAs

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:36:47 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Lead - free updates

Antw: [TN] Lead - free updates

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 09:15:09 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] MSD's

Antw: [TN] MSD's

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 11:13:41 +0200

88 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] MSD's

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 08:27:07 +0800

159 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] MSD's

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 09:01:59 +0100

219 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Removing epoxy encapsulation

Antw: [TN] Removing epoxy encapsulation

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:21:13 +0200

70 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Antw: [TN] Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:31:12 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] voids in BGA

Re: Antw: [TN] voids in BGA

sahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 16:22:45 -0600

256 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] voids in BGA

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 08:16:53 +0800

120 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] white residues after cleaning

Antw: [TN] white residues after cleaning

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:25:15 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

Antwort: [TN] Altera BGA Reflow Problem

Antwort: [TN] Altera BGA Reflow Problem

Frank Kriesch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 09:02:37 +0200

109 lines

Antwort: [TN] Altera BGA Reflow Problem

Frank Kriesch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 09:46:31 +0200

110 lines

New Thread

AOI

AOI

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 11:40:21 -0600

24 lines

Re: AOI

Stephen Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 08:00:41 +0100

49 lines

Re: AOI

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 10:27:45 EDT

33 lines

Re: AOI

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 11:20:06 +0700

72 lines

New Thread

Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 11:22:32 EDT

74 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 10:50:48 -0500

70 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 May 2001 11:56:54 EDT

53 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 12:10:30 EDT

81 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 09:22:58 -0300

97 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Terry Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:17:15 EDT

29 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:33:27 +0800

104 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 21:16:05 -0700

116 lines

Re: Assembly "ate-up" after temp cycling...

Terry Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 14:32:12 EDT

31 lines

New Thread

Assembly Incoming Inspection Cleanliness Standards

Assembly Incoming Inspection Cleanliness Standards

Jana L. Carraway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 14:42:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Assembly Incoming Inspection Cleanliness Standards

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 09:47:08 -0500

66 lines

Re: Assembly Incoming Inspection Cleanliness Standards

Jana L. Carraway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 09:41:39 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

Assembly pre-heat ramp-up rate

Assembly pre-heat ramp-up rate

Francis Sun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 14:40:51 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH

AW: [TN] Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 15:23:22 +0200

97 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] IST - what is it?

AW: [TN] IST - what is it?

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 16:49:50 +0200

152 lines

Re: AW: [TN] IST - what is it?

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:03:57 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

AW: [TN] Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 13:20:06 +0200

27 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

Pelchat, Janice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 06:48:04 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] NTC - Graham Naisbitt

AW: [TN] NTC - Graham Naisbitt

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 16:11:29 +0200

162 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

AW: [TN] Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 09:58:44 +0200

87 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

To My E-Mail Address <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 10:19:36 EDT

63 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 13:19:16 EDT

27 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Re-ball BGA

AW: [TN] Re-ball BGA

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 10:11:29 +0200

54 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Re-ball BGA

Taylor, Royce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 07:24:08 -0400

262 lines

New Thread

Bareboard Capacitance Testing

Bareboard Capacitance Testing

Frank Hanrahan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 15:35:44 -0400

81 lines

Re: Bareboard Capacitance Testing

Estrada, Roland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:31:51 -0600

86 lines

New Thread

Bent leads

Bent leads

Jeff Slipp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 11:26:03 -0300

46 lines

Re: Bent leads

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 11:00:58 -0400

88 lines

Re: Bent leads

Rich, Barbara J <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 09:02:14 -0600

70 lines

New Thread

Best Value CCD camera

Re: Best Value CCD camera

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 May 2001 07:54:20 -0700

22 lines

Re: Best Value CCD camera

David J. Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 10:53:07 -0700

64 lines

New Thread

BGA

BGA

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:35:42 -0600

25 lines

Re: BGA

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 10:51:37 -0400

63 lines

Re: BGA

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 11:29:38 -0600

61 lines

Re: BGA

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 11:03:29 +0800

80 lines

New Thread

BGA Design

BGA Design

Colin Weber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 07:28:33 +1000

44 lines

Re: BGA Design

crbuerke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 15:42:52 -0700

86 lines

Re: BGA Design

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:38:43 +1000

89 lines

Re: BGA Design

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 13:23:34 +0800

133 lines

Re: BGA Design

Pelchat, Janice <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 05:30:19 -0500

177 lines

Re: BGA Design

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 09:54:27 -0500

129 lines

New Thread

BGA Pad repair

BGA Pad repair

Jason Cross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 13:13:39 -0400

36 lines

Re: BGA Pad repair

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 12:35:08 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

BGA solderball anomaly

BGA solderball anomaly

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 14:50:12 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

BGA's failure during rework process.

BGA's failure during rework process.

Tamir Ben Shoshan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 17:21:01 +0300

39 lines

Re: BGA's failure during rework process.

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:02:49 -0400

81 lines

Re: BGA's failure during rework process.

Francois Monette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 10:04:53 -0400

80 lines

Re: BGA's failure during rework process.

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 11:15:11 +0800

96 lines

New Thread

Black Pad

Black Pad

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 09:48:02 +0200

38 lines

Re: Black Pad

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 09:00:28 EDT

95 lines

Re: Black Pad

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 07:23:27 -0600

117 lines

Re: Black Pad

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 13:05:12 -0700

71 lines

Re: Black Pad

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 08:09:10 +0800

87 lines

Re: Black Pad

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2001 20:45:47 EDT

33 lines

Re: Black Pad

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 09:45:36 +0200

133 lines

Re: Black Pad

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 09:39:40 -0600

86 lines

Re: Black Pad

Mike Trammel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 11:02:34 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Blackhole problems

Blackhole problems

Torben Slot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 09:16:26 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

Blind and burried Via's

Blind and burried Via's

Flatfield, Cadcam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 12:36:50 +0200

69 lines

Re: Blind and burried Via's

G. C. Vaghasia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 13:29:51 -0400

119 lines

New Thread

Calling Underfill Users

Calling Underfill Users

Hann Pang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 17:00:46 -0500

40 lines

Re: Calling Underfill Users

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 08:38:19 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

Cleaner/Degreaser

Cleaner/Degreaser

Joseph T Slanina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 15:12:06 -0500

35 lines

Re: Cleaner/Degreaser

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 May 2001 13:31:30 -0700

24 lines

Re: Cleaner/Degreaser

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 16:42:20 -0400

70 lines

Re: Cleaner/Degreaser

Ken Bowers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 13:40:21 -0700

63 lines

Re: Cleaner/Degreaser

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 09:48:22 +0300

57 lines

New Thread

Cobalt or Nickel hardened gold?

Cobalt or Nickel hardened gold?

peter blokhuis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 12:17:56 -0700

34 lines

Re: Cobalt or Nickel hardened gold?

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 13:00:30 -0100

70 lines

Re: Cobalt or Nickel hardened gold?

Phillip E. Hinton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 12:06:12 EDT

31 lines

New Thread

Component Failure Temperatures

Component Failure Temperatures

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 17:57:49 +0800

45 lines

Re: Component Failure Temperatures

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 08:32:17 -0500

50 lines

Re: Component Failure Temperatures

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 07:48:22 -0700

70 lines

Re: Component Failure Temperatures

Francois Monette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 22:45:10 -0400

89 lines

New Thread

Component identification

Component identification

Michel Arbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 07:35:58 -0500

25 lines

Re: Component identification

Tom Parkinson - Quality System Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 10:00:29 -0400

55 lines

Re: Component identification

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 16:09:11 +0200

57 lines

Re: Component identification

Bernie Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 16:28:14 -0400

64 lines

Re: Component identification

Shawn Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 14:13:29 -0700

90 lines

Re: Component identification

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 17:47:36 -0500

100 lines

New Thread

conductive epoxy prepreg

conductive epoxy prepreg

<Bob Mcgarry> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 10:58:08 -0400

25 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

Anselmo, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 12:24:28 -0400

151 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:52:13 -0600

161 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

Jorge Santana <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 14:40:00 -0500

63 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

Terveen, James @ NARDAEAST <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 15:43:59 -0400

56 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:03:58 -0700

26 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 11:31:27 +0800

79 lines

Re: conductive epoxy prepreg

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 08:30:42 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

Conductive Paint......

Conductive Paint......

Peter tremewen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 16:27:55 +1000

37 lines

Re: Conductive Paint......

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 08:12:08 -0600

76 lines

Re: Conductive Paint......

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 07:14:00 -0700

60 lines

Re: Conductive Paint......

Michel Arbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 10:48:28 -0400

76 lines

Re: Conductive Paint......

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 12:59:51 EDT

23 lines

New Thread

Conductivity or Resistivity?

Conductivity or Resistivity?

Dave Abbott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 05:55:33 -0500

33 lines

Re: Conductivity or Resistivity?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 15:53:09 +0300

64 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Service

Conformal Coating Service

Tom B. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 07:47:16 -0400

34 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Service

Hans Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 13:18:49 -0700

83 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Wicking

Conformal Coating Wicking

Paul Bannister <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:00:15 -0400

41 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 09:37:36 -0700

65 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:43:53 -0400

73 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

Tom Parkinson - Quality System Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:52:55 -0400

62 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 14:13:05 -0400

35 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 08:43:15 +0800

103 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

Alan Brewin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:16:59 +0100

83 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking

Hans Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 12:35:48 -0700

111 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Wicking plus NTC

Conformal Coating Wicking plus NTC

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 13:02:36 -0400

90 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Wicking plus NTC

Keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 14:02:18 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Controlled Impedance

Controlled Impedance

Benjamin Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 14:31:06 +0800

64 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 09:58:21 +0100

115 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 08:48:09 EDT

77 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Tuan Le <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 08:27:43 -0700

94 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

G. C. Vaghasia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 10:47:40 -0400

74 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Richard W Hinebaugh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 11:56:26 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Copper roll clad PVC laminate material for flexible circuits

Copper roll clad PVC laminate material for flexible circuits

Martin Christie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 14:34:22 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

COST (AUST $)EXT. COST

COST (AUST $)EXT. COST

Clayton Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 17:59:22 +1000

23 lines

Re: COST (AUST $)EXT. COST

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 07:43:42 EDT

42 lines

New Thread

Cotton Gloves/Finger Cots

Cotton Gloves/Finger Cots

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 07:07:41 -0600

43 lines

Re: Cotton Gloves/Finger Cots

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 10:57:58 -0400

92 lines

Re: Cotton Gloves/Finger Cots

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 13:19:37 -0400

92 lines

New Thread

Cpk study

Cpk study

Rodel Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2001 15:39:25 +0800

35 lines

Re: Cpk study

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 12:35:45 EDT

31 lines

Re: Cpk study

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 12:09:25 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

cyanite ester

cyanite ester

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 10:33:17 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

D-SUB CONNECTOR, PCB MOUNT FOR REFLOW PROCESS

Re: D-SUB CONNECTOR, PCB MOUNT FOR REFLOW PROCESS

Bikman Marvin-BUSR19 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 17:58:24 +0300

29 lines

New Thread

Data Collections

Data Collections

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 07:21:07 -0600

97 lines

Re: Data Collections

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 08:47:15 +0800

126 lines

New Thread

Data conversion

Data conversion

Elisa Chua <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 01:35:49 -0500

31 lines

Re: Data conversion

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:55:44 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Depaneling Standard

Depaneling Standard

Mike Di Giacomo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 14:01:11 -0500

27 lines

Re: Depaneling Standard

Kathy Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 13:33:43 -0700

50 lines

Re: Depaneling Standard

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 09:58:03 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

Differential impedance prediction on woven glass reinforced substrates.

Differential impedance prediction on woven glass reinforced substrates.

Martyn Gaudion <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 11:53:52 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Dinosaur wind

Re: Dinosaur wind

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 11:12:23 +0800

409 lines

New Thread

Discoloration of LPI solder mask

Discoloration of LPI solder mask

Ed Hare <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 10:12:10 -0700

38 lines

Re: Discoloration of LPI solder mask

Tom Parkinson - Quality System Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 15:13:38 -0400

76 lines

Re: Discoloration of LPI solder mask

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:01:24 -0700

89 lines

Re: Discoloration of LPI solder mask

John Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 16:33:55 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

Dress Code

Dress Code

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 11:02:06 -0600

26 lines

Re: Dress Code

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 12:22:14 -0500

63 lines

Re: Dress Code

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 13:23:18 -0400

55 lines

Re: Dress Code

Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 10:21:23 -0700

69 lines

Re: Dress Code

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 13:38:57 -0400

86 lines

Re: Dress Code

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 14:01:09 -0400

67 lines

Re: Dress Code

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 14:05:27 EDT

55 lines

Re: Dress Code

Gen Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 16:53:40 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Dumb question

Dumb question

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 07:59:58 -0500

41 lines

Re: Dumb question

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 15:26:49 +0200

71 lines

Re: Dumb question

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 10:30:47 -0400

83 lines

Re: Dumb question

Mengers, William D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 10:45:46 -0400

135 lines

Re: Dumb question

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:14:51 -0400

57 lines

Re: Dumb question

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 08:30:56 +0800

100 lines

New Thread

Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold

Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold

Gordon Falconer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 21:26:16 +0100

29 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 16:04:29 -0600

60 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 16:40:16 -0600

75 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 13:05:55 EDT

52 lines

New Thread

Engineering SERVING

Engineering SERVING

Charles E. McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2001 18:39:07 -0700

21 lines

Re: Engineering SERVING

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2001 21:47:06 EDT

37 lines

New Thread

ENIG in flex layers

ENIG in flex layers

Jindra, Larry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 12:16:11 -0700

26 lines

Re: ENIG in flex layers

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 16:57:48 -0400

61 lines

Re: ENIG in flex layers

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 15:42:46 -0700

76 lines

Re: ENIG in flex layers

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 20:20:40 EDT

31 lines

Re: ENIG in flex layers

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:19 +0800

84 lines

Re: ENIG in flex layers

Larry Tawyea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 07:48:03 EDT

41 lines

Re: ENIG in flex layers

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 09:35:37 -0100

131 lines

New Thread

epoxy B encapulation

epoxy B encapulation

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 15:15:29 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Epoxy encapsulation

Epoxy encapsulation

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 09:37:27 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Equivalent BS specs

Equivalent BS specs

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:17:23 +1000

50 lines

New Thread

ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 12:30:48 -0500

33 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

PERALTA, Kevin (BREA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 13:59:39 -0400

168 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 13:57:41 EDT

135 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 13:09:06 -0500

52 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

PERALTA, Kevin (BREA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:25:34 -0400

164 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 11:55:24 -0700

81 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:05:01 -0500

88 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Estrada, Roland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 13:12:58 -0600

107 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:58:29 +0800

92 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 07:11:47 -0400

75 lines

Re: ESD Approved Packing Foam vs. Static Shielding Bags

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 09:44:28 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

Evaluating Solder Pastes

Evaluating Solder Pastes

James Tingey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 13:05:54 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Exposure frame

Exposure frame

Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 10:52:27 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

extractable ionic content determination

extractable ionic content determination

Ilknur Baylakoglu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 14:56:13 -0400

30 lines

Re: extractable ionic content determination

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 14:59:08 -0700

119 lines

Re: extractable ionic content determination

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 18:09:01 -0400

137 lines

Re: extractable ionic content determination

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 15:02:06 -0700

105 lines

Re: extractable ionic content determination

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 08:53:28 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

Fiducials

Fiducials

Safavi-Bayat,Shahed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 10:58:03 -0400

72 lines

Re: Fiducials

Sharon Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 09:15:58 -0700

62 lines

Re: Fiducials

Ed Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 12:20:10 -0400

159 lines

Re: Fiducials

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 09:21:50 +0800

84 lines

Re: Fiducials

Michael Kuczynski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 08:41:08 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

First Article Software

Re: First Article Software

D.Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 08:26:13 +0200

107 lines

New Thread

Fixed Carbon Resistors

Fixed Carbon Resistors

Frank Barber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 13:33:12 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fixed Carbon Resistors

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 13:50:10 -0400

61 lines

Re: Fixed Carbon Resistors

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 15:00:05 -0700

77 lines

Re: Fixed Carbon Resistors

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 17:48:49 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

Flex Material

Flex Material

Michael Lester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 12:35:23 EDT

40 lines

Re: Flex Material

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 10:26:32 -0700

66 lines

Re: Flex Material

Michael Lester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 14:11:26 EDT

37 lines

Re: Flex Material

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 11:56:55 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

Flying probe test?

Flying probe test?

Dan Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 14:46:12 -0500

35 lines

Re: Flying probe test?

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 15:03:10 -0600

61 lines

Re: Flying probe test?

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 16:50:39 -0500

68 lines

Re: Flying probe test?

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 16:10:05 -0700

179 lines

New Thread

FW: Mail System Error - Returned Mail

FW: Mail System Error - Returned Mail

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 12:35:58 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

Fw: Reliability of exposed copper

Re: Fw: Reliability of exposed copper

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:32:16 +0800

220 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Sales Director

FW: [TN] Sales Director

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 13:40:14 -0400

127 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Sales Director

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 19:33:17 -0400

153 lines

New Thread

Gold embrittlement

Gold embrittlement

Jorge Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:39:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: Gold embrittlement

Mike Di Giacomo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 17:42:43 -0400

76 lines

Re: Gold embrittlement

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 08:56:15 -0500

70 lines

Re: Gold embrittlement

Benjamin Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 07:44:38 +0800

71 lines

New Thread

HASL can the height be controlled?

HASL can the height be controlled?

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 16:38:14 -0400

26 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

Doty, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 17:34:05 -0400

143 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

Larry Tawyea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 17:47:29 EDT

85 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

mark simmons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 15:04:14 -0700

100 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

Sherry Goodell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 19:23:07 -0400

67 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

John Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:11:31 -0400

26 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 10:02:45 -0400

59 lines

Re: HASL can the height be controlled?

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 12:33:32 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

HASL Height . . .

Re: HASL Height . . .

Hollandsworth, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 07:37:31 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Help with Fuji CP2"s

Help with Fuji CP2"s

Horizon/Guy Luempert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 12:06:16 -0500

37 lines

Re: Help with Fuji CP2"s

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 13:35:28 -0400

82 lines

Re: Help with Fuji CP2"s

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 13:58:05 -0400

66 lines

Re: Help with Fuji CP2"s

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 14:10:23 EDT

53 lines

New Thread

High End PCB facility

Re: High End PCB facility

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 15:44:01 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

High Freq and OSP Coated Boards

High Freq and OSP Coated Boards

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 10:04:19 -0400

31 lines

Re: High Freq and OSP Coated Boards

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 17:46:33 +0200

55 lines

Re: High Freq and OSP Coated Boards

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 08:48:37 -0600

71 lines

Re: High Freq and OSP Coated Boards

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 12:51:38 -0400

129 lines

New Thread

High G PBAs

Re: High G PBAs

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 17:12:21 +1000

51 lines

Re: High G PBAs

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 03:32:52 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

High quality PWB prototype house

High quality PWB prototype house

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 11:08:15 -0500

31 lines

Re: High quality PWB prototype house

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 08:41:39 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Humidity

Humidity

Rougeux, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 10:48:51 -0500

26 lines

Re: Humidity

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 11:09:29 -0500

52 lines

Re: Humidity

Francois Monette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 14:33:54 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

IC test labs

IC test labs

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:13:57 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

ICT after double sided reflow

ICT after double sided reflow

Dan Ratcliff 727-530-8762 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:53:09 -0400

67 lines

Re: ICT after double sided reflow

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 13:01:51 +0800

122 lines

Re: ICT after double sided reflow

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 07:29:36 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

Immersion silver boards tarnish

Re: Immersion silver boards tarnish

Mason Hu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 17:56:25 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Inspection

Inspection

PERALTA, Kevin (BREA) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 15:49:58 -0400

116 lines

Re: Inspection

Ed Cosper <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 16:14:17 -0400

213 lines

Re: Inspection

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 15:17:31 -0500

56 lines

Re: Inspection

Tom Parkinson - Quality System Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 16:56:54 -0400

62 lines

Re: Inspection

PERALTA, Kevin (BREA) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 17:17:26 -0400

106 lines

Re: Inspection

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 10:04:31 +0300

68 lines

Re: Inspection

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 09:38:17 +0800

104 lines

Re: Inspection

Jorge Santana <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 09:02:16 -0500

173 lines

Re: Inspection

Dave Girard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 13:02:33 -0400

59 lines

Re: Inspection

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 12:33:45 -0500

146 lines

Re: Inspection

Yves.Dupuis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 10:02:47 -0400

113 lines

Re: Inspection

Yves.Dupuis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 10:05:39 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

INSPECTION OF STENCILS

INSPECTION OF STENCILS

Steffen, Don E <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 07:18:59 -0500

112 lines

New Thread

Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH

Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH

S. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 07:39:15 EDT

43 lines

Re: Insufficient Solder Fillet in a PTH

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 10:03:41 +0800

126 lines

New Thread

Intrusive Soldering Reliability

Intrusive Soldering Reliability

Kamalesh Dhaneshwar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 16:12:24 -0500

30 lines

Re: Intrusive Soldering Reliability

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 09:09:14 -0400

79 lines

New Thread

Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized compon ents

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized compon ents

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 11:47:31 +0200

205 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized compon ents

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 14:27:38 +0200

255 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized compon ents

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 13:39:37 -0400

143 lines

New Thread

Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Chuck Mays <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2001 23:04:01 -0500

72 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 09:15:22 +0100

133 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 16:27:18 +0800

140 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 12:48:25 +0300

134 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 15:37:13 +0300

171 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 23:52:34 +0100

200 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 08:58:04 -0700

110 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sized components

Terry Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 12:03:30 EDT

82 lines

New Thread

Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcompone nts

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcompone nts

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 09:07:26 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcomponents

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcomponents

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 10:01:12 +0300

227 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcomponents

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 10:43:00 +0300

69 lines

Re: Ionic contamination limit for PWA with 0402 sizedcomponents

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 16:59:45 +0800

244 lines

New Thread

Ionic Testing

Re: Ionic Testing

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 09:03:15 +0300

64 lines

Re: Ionic Testing

Challis, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 07:43:03 -0400

267 lines

New Thread

IPC 610 question

IPC 610 question

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 09:58:40 -0400

162 lines

New Thread

IPC land to lead fillet requirements

IPC land to lead fillet requirements

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 14:56:41 -0400

31 lines

Re: IPC land to lead fillet requirements

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 20:22:33 EDT

33 lines

Re: IPC land to lead fillet requirements

Karl Sauter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 18:09:25 -0700

76 lines

New Thread

IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs?

IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs?

Steger, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 14:08:28 -0400

125 lines

Re: IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs?

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 13:30:45 -0500

52 lines

Re: IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs?

Steger, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 15:10:09 -0400

65 lines

Re: IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs?

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 16:42:36 EDT

75 lines

Re: IPC standard for solder content on the back of PCBs?

Terveen, James @ NARDAEAST <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 17:06:27 -0400

111 lines

New Thread

IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion

IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion

Bob Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 11:57:38 -0500

25 lines

Re: IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion

fullname <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 07:54:00 +0800

47 lines

Re: IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion

Pelchat, Janice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 05:43:06 -0500

95 lines

Re: IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion

Dewey Whittaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 06:39:58 -0700

145 lines

Re: IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead protrusion

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 10:08:17 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

IPC-SM-785

Re: IPC-SM-785

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 16:12:28 EDT

79 lines

New Thread

ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process M ea s urements"

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process M ea s urements"

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 10:18:14 +0200

225 lines

New Thread

ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process M eas urements"

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process M eas urements"

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 08:37:39 -0700

159 lines

New Thread

ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements"

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements"

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 15:01:47 -0400

66 lines

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements"

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 13:38:03 -0700

86 lines

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements"

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 13:04:27 +0200

114 lines

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements"

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 16:49:46 -0400

132 lines

Re: ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Meas urements"

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 12:37:33 +0200

100 lines

New Thread

ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Measurements"

ISA-S71.04 G3 "Environmental Conditions for Process Measurements"

Paul Bannister <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 14:35:41 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

IST - what is it?

IST - what is it?

Gen Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 17:00:55 -0500

31 lines

Re: IST - what is it?

Edwards, Ted A (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 15:31:27 -0700

64 lines

Re: IST - what is it?

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 08:20:59 -0600

83 lines

Re: IST - what is it?

Bill.Birch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:03:32 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

IST Coupons

IST Coupons

Crooks, Lori <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 10:16:27 -0400

86 lines

Re: IST Coupons

Dewey Whittaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 07:53:56 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

Just a tip: Topline clipart now for free

Just a tip: Topline clipart now for free

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 12:27:18 +0200

32 lines

Re: Just a tip: Topline clipart now for free

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 16:01:06 -0500

48 lines

Re: Just a tip: Topline clipart now for free

Steffen, Don E <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 16:04:37 -0500

125 lines

New Thread

Last Call for Papers for IPC Annual Meeting Tech Conference

Last Call for Papers for IPC Annual Meeting Tech Conference

John Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:43:42 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Lead - free updates

Lead - free updates

Rodel Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 13:01:18 +0800

34 lines

New Thread

Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 20:37:04 -0500

100 lines

Re: Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 07:54:02 +0300

101 lines

Re: Lifted components (MELF Cylindrical Diodes)

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:11:18 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

looking for a us board vendor doing micro vias

Re: looking for a us board vendor doing micro vias

Goh Guan Chye <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 10:06:51 +0800

67 lines

New Thread

Looking for US board vendors doing microvias

Re: Looking for US board vendors doing microvias

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:14:08 +0800

87 lines

New Thread

low foaming water sol. solder mask?

low foaming water sol. solder mask?

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 10:15:34 -0400

64 lines

Re: low foaming water sol. solder mask?

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 17:31:50 +0100

116 lines

Re: low foaming water sol. solder mask?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:35:09 +0300

35 lines

Re: low foaming water sol. solder mask?

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 10:38:44 -0400

151 lines

Re: low foaming water sol. solder mask?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 16:11:05 +0100

230 lines

New Thread

LPI in holes

LPI in holes

Kathy Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 13:01:26 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

LPI Soldermask Removal

LPI Soldermask Removal

Buscomb, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 07:53:49 -0600

24 lines

Re: LPI Soldermask Removal

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 10:28:34 -0400

54 lines

Re: LPI Soldermask Removal

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:02:38 EDT

43 lines

Re: LPI Soldermask Removal

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 May 2001 08:46:02 -0700

24 lines

Re: LPI Soldermask Removal

Michael Newman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 17:40:41 -0700

147 lines

Re: LPI Soldermask Removal

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 00:01:06 EDT

28 lines

New Thread

Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc is out of the office.

Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc is out of the office.

Mark Orlowski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 01:01:43 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Minimum Operating Temp of FR4

Minimum Operating Temp of FR4

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:09:38 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Moisture Barrier Bag WVTR

Moisture Barrier Bag WVTR

Nancy Reynolds/MKT/HQ/KEMET/US <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 13:43:48 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Moisture Indicator For Assembled Electronic Products

Moisture Indicator For Assembled Electronic Products

Hann Pang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 09:27:36 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Moisture Sensitive Components

Moisture Sensitive Components

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 14:44:07 -0400

38 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 20:10:12 EDT

67 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 11:12:14 +0800

87 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 08:40:56 -0400

102 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 16:34:51 +0300

82 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 08:26:59 -0600

80 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 07:42:21 -0700

161 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Curtis Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 08:08:24 -0700

80 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 20:18:07 EDT

72 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 11:52:18 -0700

95 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Bob Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 08:21:50 -0400

113 lines

Re: Moisture Sensitive Components

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 20:49:23 -0400

168 lines

New Thread

More on Quad pick and place

More on Quad pick and place

Mengers, William D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:43:06 -0400

32 lines

Re: More on Quad pick and place

Caldon Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 12:06:12 -0400

68 lines

Re: More on Quad pick and place

Sauer, Steven T. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 13:06:42 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

MSD's

MSD's

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 12:31:19 +0800

49 lines

New Thread

NA Testing

NA Testing

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 10:00:06 -0500

22 lines

Re: NA Testing

Caldon Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 11:43:45 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

Need Help On PCB Finish

Need Help On PCB Finish

Lam, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 10:12:05 -0700

29 lines

Re: Need Help On PCB Finish

Larry Tawyea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 17:39:52 EDT

83 lines

Re: Need Help On PCB Finish

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 12:03:56 +0800

75 lines

Re: Need Help On PCB Finish

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 12:44:38 EDT

27 lines

New Thread

New additional Information

New additional Information

Steffen, Don E <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 16:09:37 -0500

114 lines

New Thread

No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:03:58 EDT

40 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 19:02:51 +0300

61 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

Pelchat, Janice <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:45:21 -0500

108 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 May 2001 06:53:01 -0500

83 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 08:56:28 +0800

101 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

sahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 16:27:57 -0600

69 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 18:41:29 EDT

56 lines

Re: No technical content...Earthquakes in OK?

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 23:34:52 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

No technical content...really, no technical content at all.

Re: No technical content...really, no technical content at all.

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 22:37:43 EDT

65 lines

New Thread

No technical content?

Re: No technical content?

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 09:31:21 -0400

263 lines

New Thread

No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 14:49:36 -0400

144 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread

Mary Jane Chism <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 14:40:00 -0500

464 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 16:37:27 -0400

465 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread

Pete Codella <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 17:55:37 -0400

1451 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Age d thread

Bates, Barry L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:26:45 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 14:13:15 -0500

54 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread

Bob Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 16:11:24 -0400

44 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread

DDM <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:29:29 -0700

77 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 16:26:20 -0500

274 lines

Re: No technical content? I beg to differ! Salvage the Agedthread

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 00:55:45 EDT

39 lines

New Thread

No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting?

No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 17:03:33 -0700

38 lines

Re: No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting?

Jorge Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 17:42:01 -0700

70 lines

Re: No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 11:22:11 +0300

88 lines

Re: No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting?

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 07:42:58 -0400

143 lines

Re: No-clean vs Water-soluble wetting?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 20:00:39 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

NON EUTECTIC balls

NON EUTECTIC balls

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 09:23:45 +0300

42 lines

New Thread

Now its time to say goodbye to all our family...........

Now its time to say goodbye to all our family...........

Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 14:38:54 -0700

42 lines

Re: Now its time to say goodbye to all our family...........

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 19:00:19 EDT

37 lines

Re: Now its time to say goodbye to all our family...........

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 13:07:38 +0800

98 lines

New Thread

NTC

NTC

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 10:14:05 +0200

27 lines

Re: NTC

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:15:32 +0200

69 lines

Re: NTC

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:21:30 EDT

28 lines

New Thread

NTC - Graham Naisbitt

NTC - Graham Naisbitt

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 10:14:18 +0100

301 lines

New Thread

NTC Global warming

NTC Global warming

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:31:34 -0600

327 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 12:38:39 +0300

435 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 09:25:13 EDT

58 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Wilson, Robert S <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 06:45:51 -0700

101 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 22:40:16 EDT

23 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 11:35:15 +0300

150 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Steve Joy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 09:35:57 -0700

32 lines

Re: NTC Global warming

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2001 11:39:47 +0300

158 lines

New Thread

NTC Global warming/environmental quallity

Re: NTC Global warming/environmental quallity

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 11:08:35 +0800

91 lines

Re: NTC Global warming/environmental quallity

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 12:58:56 +0300

144 lines

New Thread

NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termina tion...

Re: NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termina tion...

Keel, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:15:33 -0700

94 lines

Re: NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termina tion...

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 12:55:18 -0400

84 lines

New Thread

NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termination...

NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termination...

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 10:38:39 -0400

58 lines

Re: NTC NTC NTC RE: [TN] Tin whiskers on a capacitor termination...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:18:57 EDT

51 lines

New Thread

NTC warming

Re: NTC warming

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 08:58:40 -0400

124 lines

New Thread

NTC warming/duststorm

Re: NTC warming/duststorm

Michael Lester <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2001 16:58:20 EDT

49 lines

Re: NTC warming/duststorm

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 14:10:54 +0300

70 lines

New Thread

NTC!!! Technet listserv etiquette

NTC!!! Technet listserv etiquette

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 01:36:18 +0300

34 lines

Re: NTC!!! Technet listserv etiquette

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 19:19:03 EDT

45 lines

New Thread

NTC!!!!!!!!!

Re: NTC!!!!!!!!!

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 00:30:45 +0300

62 lines

Re: NTC!!!!!!!!!

Tom Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 17:30:33 -0400

41 lines

Re: NTC!!!!!!!!!

Larry Tawyea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 20:13:07 EDT

49 lines

Re: NTC!!!!!!!!!

Phillip E. Hinton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 00:39:33 EDT

25 lines

Re: NTC!!!!!!!!!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 00:55:47 EDT

25 lines

New Thread

NTC...Bev Christian

NTC...Bev Christian

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 19:20:00 EDT

46 lines

New Thread

NTC? I beg to differ!

Re: NTC? I beg to differ!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 00:55:48 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

Omikron white tin

Omikron white tin

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 07:48:29 -0500

37 lines

Re: Omikron white tin

Steve Underwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 09:35:54 -0400

81 lines

Re: Omikron white tin

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:08:18 EDT

47 lines

New Thread

One more reference on reliability of exposed copper...

One more reference on reliability of exposed copper...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 10:08:04 EDT

50 lines

New Thread

outside source for AOI

outside source for AOI

Ed Cosper <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:18:01 -0400

57 lines

Re: outside source for AOI

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:26:43 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

Package reliabilty...

Package reliabilty...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 12:50:14 EDT

29 lines

Re: Package reliabilty...

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 17:30:14 -0400

61 lines

Re: Package reliabilty...

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 15:07:19 -0700

82 lines

Re: Package reliabilty...

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 11:43:04 +0800

98 lines

Re: Package reliabilty...

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 18:05:26 EDT

57 lines

New Thread

Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 12:57:56 -0700

131 lines

Re: Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 16:37:36 -0600

206 lines

Re: Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Mantz, Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 16:03:39 -0700

172 lines

Re: Pad in Via for BGA's - Part II

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 19:48:05 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

PCB Inspection Service

PCB Inspection Service

Debbie Goodwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 12:49:20 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

PCB paladium plating

PCB paladium plating

Jean-Luc Lehmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 16:28:15 +0200

29 lines

Re: PCB paladium plating

Mordechai Holtzman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 13:03:39 EDT

59 lines

Re: PCB paladium plating

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 17:01:22 -0100

71 lines

New Thread

Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 18:29:08 -0400

34 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:05:39 -0400

71 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Blomberg, Rainer (FL51) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:45:08 -0400

65 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 16:09:24 +0300

61 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 14:34:27 +0100

102 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 14:40:36 EDT

95 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 10:51:41 +0800

112 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 07:32:18 -0400

152 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 14:58:31 -0100

195 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 11:53:47 -0700

121 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2001 00:22:18 -0400

29 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 08:31:39 +0200

54 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 12:58:14 +0300

78 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 12:04:04 +0200

95 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 15:11:17 +0200

90 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 09:29:47 -0400

147 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 20:02:08 -0100

195 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 14:35:22 +0200

216 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Hann Pang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 09:47:36 -0500

106 lines

Re: Permanent Moisture Sensitivity Indicators?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 08:32:40 +0200

133 lines

New Thread

Physical work instructions

Physical work instructions

Bob Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 16:39:24 -0500

24 lines

Re: Physical work instructions

PERALTA, Kevin (BREA) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 18:17:52 -0400

146 lines

New Thread

Pick&place of white coil

Pick&place of white coil

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:38:43 +0200

46 lines

Re: Pick&place of white coil

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:27:38 +0100

81 lines

Re: Pick&place of white coil

Caldon Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 08:48:12 -0400

87 lines

Re: Pick&place of white coil

Jorge Santana <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 08:28:00 -0500

81 lines

Re: Pick&place of white coil

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 14:01:43 EDT

59 lines

Re: Pick&place of white coil

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 14:20:34 -0600

83 lines

Re: Pick&place of white coil

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 08:33:58 +0800

96 lines

New Thread

Plasma Etch parameters

Plasma Etch parameters

May William D (Dean) CNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 07:27:12 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Plating up Gold Tabs

Plating up Gold Tabs

Sherman Banks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 15:08:30 -0700

39 lines

Re: Plating up Gold Tabs

Doty, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 18:49:15 -0400

187 lines

Re: Plating up Gold Tabs

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 07:56:46 -0500

107 lines

Re: Plating up Gold Tabs

Anil Kher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:25:38 +0530

132 lines

Re: Plating up Gold Tabs

Robert Welch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 07:47:12 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

poster

poster

gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 10:25:14 -0700

27 lines

Re: poster

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 14:08:26 EDT

71 lines

Re: poster

D.Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 21:36:54 +0200

57 lines

Re: poster

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 20:16:28 -0500

48 lines

Re: poster

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 00:38:13 EDT

33 lines

New Thread

Process control for cleaning

Re: Process control for cleaning

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 09:15:25 +0300

71 lines

Re: Process control for cleaning

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 06:15:21 -0400

74 lines

Re: Process control for cleaning

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 13:21:52 +0200

58 lines

Re: Process control for cleaning

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 09:18:01 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

Purchasing NUVISIONS Manufacturing

Purchasing NUVISIONS Manufacturing

Charles E. McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2001 18:25:11 -0700

21 lines

Re: Purchasing NUVISIONS Manufacturing

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2001 21:34:40 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

Pure Tin

Pure Tin

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:49:26 +0200

41 lines

Re: Pure Tin

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 08:36:53 -0600

91 lines

Re: Pure Tin

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 May 2001 11:20:12 EDT

36 lines

Re: Pure Tin

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 14:04:29 EDT

20 lines

Re: Pure Tin

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 14:10:05 EDT

30 lines

Re: Pure Tin

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 12:46:34 -0600

71 lines

Re: Pure Tin

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 15:44:34 EDT

33 lines

New Thread

Pure Tin, Poor Tin

Re: Pure Tin, Poor Tin

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 09:35:50 +0200

96 lines

Re: Pure Tin, Poor Tin

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 11:46:57 -0400

181 lines

New Thread

PWB Testing

PWB Testing

Brocious, Dave A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 14:22:28 -0400

60 lines

Re: PWB Testing

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 17:16:19 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

Quad

Re: Quad

Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:21:07 -0700

89 lines

Re: Quad

Caldon Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 16:42:34 -0400

131 lines

New Thread

Quad Pick & Place

Quad Pick & Place

Mengers, William D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:30:09 -0400

32 lines

Re: Quad Pick & Place

Phil Zarrow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 13:05:55 EDT

53 lines

New Thread

Re-ball BGA

Re-ball BGA

Van Hoang Dinh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 15:18:38 +1000

73 lines

Re: Re-ball BGA

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 07:31:19 EDT

27 lines

Re: Re-ball BGA

Rob Day <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 06:57:09 -0500

38 lines

Re: Re-ball BGA

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:24:30 -0700

132 lines

New Thread

Recall: Water soluble fluxes!

Recall: Water soluble fluxes!

Iain Braddock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 09:16:33 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Recovery Time of Iron tips

Recovery Time of Iron tips

JinSee Goh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 09:01:50 +0800

65 lines

Re: Recovery Time of Iron tips

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 10:21:50 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Ref Des Letter???

Ref Des Letter???

Thomas Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 13:10:59 -0700

33 lines

Re: Ref Des Letter???

Sauer, Steven T. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 16:20:09 -0400

61 lines

Re: Ref Des Letter???

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 09:03:44 +0800

81 lines

New Thread

Removing epoxy encapsulation

Removing epoxy encapsulation

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 12:11:17 EDT

28 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 May 2001 09:17:53 -0700

21 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 12:27:38 -0400

65 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 09:43:22 -0700

71 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Bob Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 12:37:17 -0400

65 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Pelkey, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 09:52:26 -0700

58 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 12:57:53 -0400

63 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 18:42:02 +0100

70 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:54:21 -0400

104 lines

Re: Removing epoxy encapsulation

Larry Tawyea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 19:59:13 EDT

43 lines

New Thread

Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 17:39:02 EDT

43 lines

Re: Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 18:17:42 -0400

81 lines

Re: Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 18:32:59 -0400

91 lines

Re: Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Shabtay Shalev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:09:42 +0200

103 lines

Re: Removing Epoxy Encapsulation...

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 21:44:55 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

REQUEST IPC-A-610

REQUEST IPC-A-610

Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 08:46:11 -0400

19 lines

REQUEST IPC-A-610

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 08:41:45 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Resolution of Tunnel diode problem...

Resolution of Tunnel diode problem...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 11:59:01 EDT

76 lines

New Thread

Rework Wires and OA Flux

Rework Wires and OA Flux

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 14:11:24 -0400

35 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 14:25:43 -0400

60 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 13:34:17 -0500

84 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 14:35:30 EDT

75 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 13:34:21 -0500

46 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 15:26:03 -0400

61 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 10:43:48 +0300

80 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 07:21:58 -0400

104 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 07:50:31 -0500

52 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 09:28:06 -0400

71 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:12:27 -0400

150 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:55:18 -0400

146 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:55:18 -0400

47 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 15:17:48 -0500

38 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 09:26:24 +0300

69 lines

Re: Rework Wires and OA Flux

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 07:37:48 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

RivScrew for Assembly

RivScrew for Assembly

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 10:08:38 -0400

30 lines

Re: RivScrew for Assembly

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 10:39:56 -0400

92 lines

Re: RivScrew for Assembly

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 08:56:13 -0600

118 lines

Re: RivScrew for Assembly

Larry Koens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 10:17:29 -0500

171 lines

New Thread

round vs. square

Re: round vs. square

Wilson, Robert S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 10:22:58 -0700

236 lines

New Thread

RV: SALES DIRECTOR

RV: SALES DIRECTOR

Fernando Gómez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 16:37:26 +0200

461 lines

RV: SALES DIRECTOR

Fernando Gómez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 18:01:01 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

Sales Director

Sales Director

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 16:29:08 +0100

31 lines

Re: Sales Director

Mengers, William D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:42:14 -0400

63 lines

Re: Sales Director

Smith Russell PO US <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 18:09:14 +0200

40 lines

Re: Sales Director

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 13:17:40 -0400

97 lines

Re: Sales Director

Thomas Han <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:39:48 -0700

61 lines

Re: Sales Director

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 13:27:36 -0500

54 lines

Sales Director

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 15:04:36 -0500

31 lines

Re: Sales Director

Carroll, George <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 13:11:53 -0400

70 lines

Re: Sales Director

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 15:11:40 -0700

50 lines

Re: Sales Director

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 08:46:31 +0800

85 lines

Re: Sales Director

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:21:00 +0200

213 lines

Re: Sales Director

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 12:11:29 +0100

269 lines

Re: Sales Director

Yves.Dupuis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 08:50:19 -0400

94 lines

Re: Sales Director

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 May 2001 14:26:57 +0100

140 lines

New Thread

Salvage the Aged

Salvage the Aged

Bernard Kessler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 10:17:31 -0700

105 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Ed Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 15:27:24 -0400

171 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 16:12:30 EDT

31 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 13:08:47 -0700

93 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 16:33:13 -0400

61 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 17:17:45 EDT

94 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 May 2001 08:45:36 +0300

57 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 May 2001 07:01:56 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Salvage the Aged-no technical content

Re: Salvage the Aged-no technical content

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 May 2001 13:39:23 +0300

322 lines

Re: Salvage the Aged-no technical content

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 May 2001 14:09:34 +0300

235 lines

New Thread

Salvage the Aged...

Salvage the Aged...

G. C. Vaghasia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 14:08:09 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Salvage the cows (OT)

Salvage the cows (OT)

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 15:19:43 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

SCORING TEFLON BOARDS

SCORING TEFLON BOARDS

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 10:06:34 -0400

28 lines

Re: SCORING TEFLON BOARDS

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 07:41:44 -0700

71 lines

Re: SCORING TEFLON BOARDS

mark simmons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 08:28:39 -0700

50 lines

Re: SCORING TEFLON BOARDS

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 19:12:45 +0100

130 lines

New Thread

Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly)

Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly)

Pelchat, Janice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 07:26:24 -0500

41 lines

Re: Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly)

Michael McInerney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 07:55:31 -0500

66 lines

Re: Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly)

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 15:00:39 +0200

63 lines

Re: Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly)

Wenger, George M (George) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:31:15 -0400

109 lines

Re: Seeing STARS! (BGA solderball anomaly)

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 17:58:07 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

Seeing Stars...a picture is up.

Seeing Stars...a picture is up.

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 11:07:39 EDT

37 lines

Re: Seeing Stars...a picture is up.

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 17:53:25 +0200

70 lines

New Thread

Semicon photos

Semicon photos

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 12:38:44 +0100

80 lines

Re: Semicon photos

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 08:43:07 EDT

49 lines

Re: Semicon photos

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 15:16:41 +0100

79 lines

Re: Semicon photos

Bates, Barry L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:32:33 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

SET TechNet MAIL

SET TechNet MAIL

Bill Butman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 09:33:07 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Silkscreen issue

Silkscreen issue

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2001 09:05:08 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

SIR Definition

Re: SIR Definition

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 09:26:36 +0300

230 lines

New Thread

Size?: 24 x

Size?: 24 x

Charles E. McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 13:13:35 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Re: Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 09:08:54 -0600

71 lines

Re: Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Mason Hu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 17:40:34 -0500

30 lines

Re: Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 22:20:20 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

Sn whisker problem

Re: Sn whisker problem

jong s kadesch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 15:30:50 -0400

181 lines

Re: Sn whisker problem

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 15:58:02 -0400

192 lines

Re: Sn whisker problem

Jeff Seeger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 16:11:55 -0400

38 lines

Re: Sn whisker problem

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 23:56:45 +0300

97 lines

Re: Sn whisker problem

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 09:51:18 +0200

79 lines

Re: Sn whisker problem

Phillip E. Hinton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:24:36 EDT

35 lines

Re: Sn whisker problem

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 18:58:35 -0500

89 lines

New Thread

Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 12:41:14 +0200

37 lines

Re: Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 08:25:52 -0400

117 lines

Re: Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 16:16:55 +0200

147 lines

Re: Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:05:56 -0400

145 lines

Re: Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 22:58:00 +0100

249 lines

Re: Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 08:32:08 +0200

183 lines

Re: Sn whiskers, TT (Technical Topic)

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 11:11:19 +0200

265 lines

New Thread

Software

Software

Golembiewski, Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 14:15:15 -0400

28 lines

Re: Software

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 14:28:50 -0400

56 lines

Re: Software

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 14:38:14 -0400

60 lines

Re: Software

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 14:39:03 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

Solder Iron Heat Recovery Measurement

Solder Iron Heat Recovery Measurement

JinSee Goh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 19:19:30 -0500

25 lines

Re: Solder Iron Heat Recovery Measurement

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 20:54:25 EDT

37 lines

Re: Solder Iron Heat Recovery Measurement

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 10:20:40 -0700

64 lines

Re: Solder Iron Heat Recovery Measurement

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 09:56:21 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Solder Mask Material...

Solder Mask Material...

Mike Di Giacomo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 16:12:36 -0400

30 lines

Re: Solder Mask Material...

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 May 2001 04:23:12 EDT

20 lines

New Thread

Solder Peaks...

Re: Solder Peaks...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 08:16:21 -0400

68 lines

Re: Solder Peaks...

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 08:21:45 -0500

48 lines

Re: Solder Peaks...

Mike Di Giacomo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 11:04:09 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

Solder Pot Analysis

Solder Pot Analysis

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 16:31:14 -0500

54 lines

Re: Solder Pot Analysis

Hans Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 15:00:02 -0700

49 lines

Re: Solder Pot Analysis

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 18:35:55 -0400

41 lines

Re: Solder Pot Analysis

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 15:41:22 -0700

64 lines

Re: Solder Pot Analysis

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 12:54:50 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Solder Rework using IMpcb Board Material

Solder Rework using IMpcb Board Material

Paul Baine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:55:42 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Solder Technology International Webpage

Solder Technology International Webpage

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:38:57 -0400

27 lines

Re: Solder Technology International Webpage

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 12:32:28 -0400

66 lines

Re: Solder Technology International Webpage

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:15:12 -0400

59 lines

Re: Solder Technology International Webpage

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 12:45:44 -0500

61 lines

Re: Solder Technology International Webpage

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:43:00 -0500

103 lines

Re: Solder Technology International Webpage

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 11:48:40 +0800

83 lines

Re: Solder Technology International Webpage

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:53:08 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Solder Voiding

Solder Voiding

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 17:55:40 +0800

49 lines

Re: Solder Voiding

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:31:28 -0400

81 lines

Re: Solder Voiding

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 08:44:47 -0600

87 lines

Re: Solder Voiding

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 07:44:45 -0700

75 lines

Re: Solder Voiding

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2001 09:08:42 +0800

98 lines

New Thread

solder wick, no-clean vs. no-flux

solder wick, no-clean vs. no-flux

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:33:20 -0400

34 lines

Re: solder wick, no-clean vs. no-flux

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:45:00 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

Soldering batteries on boards

Soldering batteries on boards

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 16:06:02 -0400

100 lines

Re: Soldering batteries on boards

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 15:25:51 -0500

147 lines

Re: Soldering batteries on boards

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 17:18:03 -0400

79 lines

Re: Soldering batteries on boards

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 11:25:51 +0800

113 lines

New Thread

solithane conf. coat

solithane conf. coat

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 May 2001 11:56:40 -0500

31 lines

Re: solithane conf. coat

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 10:02:43 +0300

54 lines

Re: solithane conf. coat

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 12:06:20 +0100

88 lines

Re: solithane conf. coat

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 07:11:57 -0700

55 lines

Re: solithane conf. coat

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 18:50:52 +0300

74 lines

New Thread

some technical content, but not much

Re: some technical content, but not much

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 11:00:54 -0700

39 lines

Re: some technical content, but not much

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 14:32:01 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

SOT23 opens & DOE Test board layout.

SOT23 opens & DOE Test board layout.

Kelly Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 15:32:47 -0500

48 lines

Re: SOT23 opens & DOE Test board layout.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 23:23:07 EDT

44 lines

Re: SOT23 opens & DOE Test board layout.

Martin Christie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 08:00:32 +0100

85 lines

Re: SOT23 opens & DOE Test board layout.

Tom B. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2001 07:21:06 -0400

102 lines

New Thread

SPC for PCB

SPC for PCB

Bob Fulton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 12:50:18 -0500

60 lines

Re: SPC for PCB

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 09:29:41 +0200

45 lines

Re: SPC for PCB

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2001 13:15:25 +0300

59 lines

New Thread

SPC Pick n' Place

SPC Pick n' Place

PL <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:23:33 -0700

33 lines

Re: SPC Pick n' Place

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 16:31:01 EDT

36 lines

Re: SPC Pick n' Place

peter lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 14:20:16 -0700

82 lines

Re: SPC Pick n' Place

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 15:39:24 -0600

140 lines

New Thread

Standard for Crimpng connectors

Standard for Crimpng connectors

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 12:59:58 -0500

66 lines

Re: Standard for Crimpng connectors

Dewey Whittaker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2001 13:13:40 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

subContractors

subContractors

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 09:19:59 +1000

46 lines

New Thread

Surface Finish for 1.27mm PBGA

Surface Finish for 1.27mm PBGA

Colin Weber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:45:59 +1000

26 lines

Re: Surface Finish for 1.27mm PBGA

<Peter George Duncan> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:14:33 +0800

73 lines

New Thread

T&B Connector

T&B Connector

Anselmo, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 18:00:45 -0400

80 lines

Re: T&B Connector

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 18:37:44 EDT

37 lines

Re: T&B Connector

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2001 16:44:37 -0700

99 lines

Re: T&B Connector

Anselmo, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 09:20:25 -0400

175 lines

New Thread

Technet Listserv Etiquette

Technet Listserv Etiquette

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 13:26:34 -0500

55 lines

Re: Technet Listserv Etiquette

Kathy Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 14:08:32 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

TechNet Police

TechNet Police

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2001 11:31:02 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

Temperature cycling specification

Temperature cycling specification

Luca Amato <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 10:54:17 -0400

25 lines

Re: Temperature cycling specification

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2001 08:08:11 +1000

57 lines

Re: Temperature cycling specification

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2001 18:48:01 EDT

25 lines

New Thread

Test - please ignore

Test - please ignore

Clive ffitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 09:57:56 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

The alter ego.....

The alter ego.....

Richard Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 21:38:59 -0700

28 lines

Re: The alter ego.....

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2001 11:25:17 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

thermo relief in conductor planes

thermo relief in conductor planes

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 11:18:01 -0500

35 lines

Re: thermo relief in conductor planes

Kathy Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 11:15:01 -0700

54 lines

Re: thermo relief in conductor planes

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 16:37:22 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

this message text

this message text

Charles E. McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 18:20:17 -0700

21 lines