Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0ulqc4-0000NcC; Thu, 1 Aug 96 00:48 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
01 Aug 96 01:51:35 EDT |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
From [log in to unmask] Thu Aug 1 08: |
40:53 1996 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"XAVUs.0.ImI.FK40o"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with my friend from Mercury pull testing is a useful test but it can
give misleading information if not done correctly. I use it as a method of
comparing profile results and the degree of voiding that may be present. It is
difficult to directly relate it to reliability data.
Bob Willis
Electronic Presentation Services
2 Fourth Avenue, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 4HA. England.
Tel: (44) 01245 351502
Fax: (44) 01245 496123
Home Page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bwillis
Email: [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|