 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Oct 9 14: |
05:19 1996 |
| Date: |
Wed, 9 OCT 96 11:09:54 MDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"U9utJ2.0.wRA.BP-Mo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vB2o5-0000WwC; Wed, 9 Oct 96 12:52 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You might discover an increase in tombstoning components attributed to the
amount of surface tension of the reflowed solder versus the relative weight
of the component. Often times one of the component pads may reflow a split
second prior to the other pad, and the resulting surface tensions may shift/
and or tilt the component up. These problems can be worked out by finding the
proper combination of reflow process, and component pad geometry. Some
manufacturers seem to use component pads that are reduced at the component ends
to help reduce the outward surface tension. Good luck.
Steve A
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
