TECHNET Archives

January 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:29:00 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
We have an overseas board supplier that is supplying an immersion gold
finished board that is only 1-1.5 microinches of gold over 100 microinches
of nickel.  I believe this may be too thin a gold layer for adequate
protection of the nickel but don't have any objective evidence for this.
Can anybody give me any feedback or other information sources that might
support this?  IPC-2221 specifies approximately 3-9 microinches of gold
which is what we generally require, but I'm looking for additional objective
evidence for requiring thicker gold deposits.

Thanks in advance.

Rick Thompson

Sr. SMT Process Engineer
SMTEK International, Inc.
+1 (805) 532-2800
[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2