TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uWrrA-0000CoC; Thu, 20 Jun 96 17:05 CDT
Encoding:
15 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 20 Jun 96 15:07:48 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4784
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 21 09:
00:13 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"RjS5s3.0.MS7.piSon"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
     Concerning my original question about the possible degradation of OSP 
     when baking a Thermount or any board prior to wave.
     
     1) What's the problem with Thermount, or what could happen if you 
     don't bake?  Due the the hydrophillic nature of the stuff it 
     delaminates when not dehydrated...remember measles?...muliply them.
     
     2) So, my question is really not about OSPs handling multiple reflows 
     but OSPs handling a pre-bake prior to the wave.  That's the crux of 
     the problem.  Can an OSP handle a prebake at say 225 degress F for 6 
     hours?
     
     Thank you for all your responses.  
     
     (I do appreciate this meduim, thank you IPC!)  



ATOM RSS1 RSS2