TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 29 Oct 96 15:13:34 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 31 16:
43:13 1996
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7205
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ub5Wg.0._2F.27fTo"@ipc>
Subject:
X-Priority:
3 (Normal)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vINUw-0000TUC; Tue, 29 Oct 96 17:23 CST
From:
<[log in to unmask]> (Steve Sparkowich)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (190 lines)
Was soldermask on the board when it was run through electroless 
Nickel/Immersion Gold?  

If so, is the soldermask proven to be compatible with the electroless 
Nickel bath?

If not, there was probably a lot of soldermask curing going on after 
plating which will oxidize nickel through the porous immersion gold.  
Thicker gold and/or an acid cleaner (to remove Nickel oxides) after the 
curing will help. 


Steve Sparkowich
Plating Engr.
[log in to unmask]





VIC BELDAVS <[log in to unmask]> Wrote:
| 
| I sent this message earlier. At the same time, lost contact 
| with Tech  Net.
| I'm not sure if this message got through. If it did, I 
| apologize for the
| duplication.
| 
| We purchase some pc boards with immersion gold over nickel to 
| obtain
| flat pads for better stenciling of solder paste. Our spec is 
| 5-8
| microinches of immersion gold over 150-200 microinches of 
| electroless
| nickel. We have generally been successful. The indications 
| are that
| about one year ago when this was first implemented, the gold 
| plating
| was coming in per the spec.
| 
| At this point, however, we are seeing the gold thickness to 
| be more in
| the range of 2-4 microinches. We are still doing OK except 
| for one batch
| of boards that came in recently. There are solderability 
| problems with
| these boards. This batch is also associated with a solder 
| mask change.
| But we also have other immersion gold boards with the same 
| solder
| mask change and no solderability problems.
| 
| Could it be that 2-4 microinches is at the ragged edge where 
| the gold is
| insufficiently robust to withstand further processing at the 
| fabricator and
| in assembly?
| 
| Does anyone else have similar experiences with immersion gold 
| in the
| 2-4 microinch range?
| 
| Is anyone consistently doing well with about 2-4 microinches 
| of gold?
| 
| Thanking you in advance.
| 
| Vic 
B
e
l
d
a
v
s



4
1
4
-
3
6
2
-
2
7
9
7



v
i
c
.
b
e
l
d
a
v
s
@
m
a
i
l
.
m
e
i
.
c
o
m






*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
| **************************************************************
| * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using 
| SmartList v3.05 
*



*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
| **************************************************************
| * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message 
| to:           *
| * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no 
| text.        
*



*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
| **************************************************************
| 

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2