TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vHvOh-0000R6C; Mon, 28 Oct 96 11:22 CST
X-Incognito-Sn:
1069
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 28 Oct 96 8:55:11 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Mon Oct 28 11:
57:07 1996
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7182
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"HCbgi3.0.weK.blETo"@ipc>
Subject:
X-Priority:
3 (Normal)
X-Loop:
From:
<[log in to unmask]> (Steve Sparkowich)
X-Incognito-Format:
VERSION=2.01a ENCRYPTED=NO
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Goal: Solderability testing which most pleases our SMT customers? 
 
A. Which solderability test method (i.e. Wetting Balance, SERA, IPC Edge 
Dip, etc.) do you want your PCB/PWB vendor to conduct on Electroless 
Ni/Immersion Au boards? 

B. How do you screen incoming lots of boards for solderability?

C. How do you use PCB/PWB solderability testing to improve SMT? 

Thanks in advance for your input!

Steve Sparkowich
Sr. Process Engr.
[log in to unmask]
Ph. 503-359-9300 ext.54653

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2