Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vHvOh-0000R6C; Mon, 28 Oct 96 11:22 CST |
X-Incognito-Sn: |
1069 |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 96 8:55:11 PST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Mon Oct 28 11: |
57:07 1996 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"HCbgi3.0.weK.blETo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
X-Priority: |
3 (Normal) |
X-Loop: |
|
From: |
|
X-Incognito-Format: |
VERSION=2.01a ENCRYPTED=NO |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Goal: Solderability testing which most pleases our SMT customers?
A. Which solderability test method (i.e. Wetting Balance, SERA, IPC Edge
Dip, etc.) do you want your PCB/PWB vendor to conduct on Electroless
Ni/Immersion Au boards?
B. How do you screen incoming lots of boards for solderability?
C. How do you use PCB/PWB solderability testing to improve SMT?
Thanks in advance for your input!
Steve Sparkowich
Sr. Process Engr.
[log in to unmask]
Ph. 503-359-9300 ext.54653
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|