Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v3OFq-0000PhC; Wed, 18 Sep 96 10:09 CDT |
Encoding: |
28 TEXT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 96 10:13:00 CDT |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
From [log in to unmask] Wed Sep 18 10: |
32:48 1996 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"runiL2.0.BVB.i21Go"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Howdy,
I understand that the paste height of one mil or more above the stencil
thickness is quite common. Controlling the paste height is a good way to
monitor screen printing process. However, it's imperative to review the
correlation between your defect data vs paste height to determine your SPC
target. Keep in mind that the following factors can also affect the screen
printing process yield:
- board warp**
- aperture design
- board support**
- printing parameters (Snap off)**
- solder mask**
- surface finish**
- squeegee type**
- print locations**
- footprint design
- stencil thickness**
etc....
Note: ** affect Paste height
Hope this helps
Michael Yuen
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|