 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vNiil-0000URC; Wed, 13 Nov 96 11:03 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 1996 12:12:17 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 15 09: |
16:28 1996 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"8o3ON1.0.7sM.QzVYo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You certainly will not get the concave solder fillet without surface pads,
but through-hole connections have significant redundancies as compared to SMT
solder joints and that should not adversely impact reliability. This of
course assume that the design is otherwise properly designed. Since you still
have pads on the side from which repairs are done, repair operations should
also not be impacted.
Werner Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, Inc.
Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
23 Gunther Street
Mendham, NJ 07945 USA
Phone & Fax: 201-543-2747
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
