 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t8XuK-0000GgC; Thu, 26 Oct 95 14:24 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<buetmi> |
| Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 1995 13:31:29 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| cc: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
13:07 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"cWvYc1.0.36R.L1-Zm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9510261337.B61785-0100000@ipc> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Daniel:
The inside cover of J-STD-001A and page vi of IPC-A-610B show the
synopsized relationship of the two documents.
Page v of IPC-A-610B is even more explicit: "J-STD-001 establishes
the minimum acceptability
requirements for printed board assemblies soldering. IPC-A-620, when
addressing soldering is a companion and complimentary document, providing
pictorial interpretation of the requirements of J-STD-001."
It goes on to note: "The IPC-A-610 has additional criteria defining
handling, mechanical requirements, and other workmanship requirements."
Either spec can be used when invoked by customer or contractual
agreement. A-610 may be used as a standalone document for inspection, but
keep in mind that it doesn't specify the frequency of in-process or
end-product inspection, nor the allowable number of repair/rework
defects. These are found in -001.
Mike Buetow
IPC Technical Staff
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
T: 708-509-9700
F: 708-509-9798
[log in to unmask]
On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Daniel F. Shea wrote:
> We are in the process of standardizing our assembly standards
> for pwa's. Should we be referencing IPC-A-610 or ANSI/J-STD-001
> or both. There is a lot of duplication between the two.
> Thanks
>
> dshea@sentry
|
|
|
