Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t8Y82-0000GnC; Thu, 26 Oct 95 14:38 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!ccmail.dsccc.com!bwooldri> |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 95 13:26:21 CST |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
13:10 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"bHKE91.0.T0N.dE-Zm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There should be a lot of the same information in these two
documents. The J/STD-001 is the engineering requirements
document while the A-610 is the minimum acceptable criteria for
those requirements shown pictorially. Take a look at the A-610
foreword on page vi. This defines the documents relationship to
each other.
If you are standardizing your assembly design or processing
standards use the J/STD-001. If you are standardizing your
assembly workmanship acceptability standards, ie. is it
acceptable or nonconforming product at some inspection point, use
the A-610.
Hope this is helpful.
Bruce Wooldridge
DSC Communications Inc.
IPC-A-610 Task Group Vice Chairman
214/519-6170
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: IPC-A-610 vs ANSI/J-STD-001
Author: [log in to unmask] at SMTPLINK
Date: 10/24/95 04:52 PM
We are in the process of standardizing our assembly standards
for pwa's.
Should we be referencing IPC-A-610 or ANSI/J-STD-001
or both.
There is a lot of duplication between the two.
Thanks
dshea@sentry
|
|
|