Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uWSwT-0000FfC; Wed, 19 Jun 96 14:29 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:35:34 -0500 (EST) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 21 08: |
40:57 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vhZgj.0.DL8.OK5on"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
cc: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Iam interested in this to
Henry R. Linneweh
On Wed, 19 Jun 1996, Gloria Ebert wrote:
> HOW DO I RECEIVE THIS IPC REVIEW?
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> Subject: Re: ASSM: 610B
> Author: [log in to unmask] at OUT
> Date: 6/19/96 12:42 PM
>
>
> Peter:
>
> IPC developed such a list and published it in the October/November 1995
> issue of the IPC Review (page 13).
>
> I'll have a copy faxed to you.
>
> Mike Buetow
> IPC Technical Staff
> 2215 Sanders Road
> Northbrook, IL 60062
> P: 847-509-9700, ext. 335
> F: 847-509-9798
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 1996, Peter Swanson wrote:
>
> > One of our customers has to write a report detailing the changes
> > between IPC-A-610B and the previous revision A. Has anyone already done this,
> > and would be willing to share?
> >
> > TIA, Peter
> >
> > I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-
> I
> > Peter Swanson Oxfordshire, England
> > Dynamix Technology Ltd, IPC/UK
> > [log in to unmask] Compuserve: 100120,3641
> > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Peter_Swanson
> >
> > If it weren't for the last minute, nothing would ever get done.
> > I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-
> I
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|