 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uWQNF-0000CmC; Wed, 19 Jun 96 11:44 CDT |
| Lines: |
14 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 17:46:39 GMT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 21 08: |
39:37 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"fVn5k3.0.Hy6.8w2on"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
PCElm 1.10 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One of our customers has to write a report detailing the changes
between IPC-A-610B and the previous revision A. Has anyone already done this,
and would be willing to share?
TIA, Peter
I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
Peter Swanson Oxfordshire, England
Dynamix Technology Ltd, IPC/UK
[log in to unmask] Compuserve: 100120,3641
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Peter_Swanson
If it weren't for the last minute, nothing would ever get done.
I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
|
|
|
