TECHNET Archives

August 2019

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:10:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hi Guy - well, we used to use electroplated SnPb as a standard printed
circuit board finish for years until the modern immersion type finishes
took over. However, we always reflowed/fused the electroplated SnPb
finishes (typically in peanut oil) as a non-fused electroplated SnPb finish
had poor solderability characteristics (i.e. oxidation). There is an "art"
to fusing an electrolplated SnPb surface finish uniformly. Perhaps what you
are observing is a supplier difference is their fusing process.

Dave Hillman
Collins Aerospace
[log in to unmask]


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:07 PM Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> One of our customers specifies electroplated tin-lead reflowed as a surface
> finish.
> It yields relatively nice flat pads and a good solderable finish.
> One of the drawings did not specify "reflowed". Everything seemed fine.
> Then, we had to switch vendors.
> The new vendor asked about this odd request for surface finish.
> Electroplated Sn-Pb, not reflowed.  But, they followed the drawing notes.
> Now, we have the boards in hand. They look bad. We are running a test print
> on the solder sample but I am dubious.
> Have any of you experience with electroplated Sn-Pb as a surface finish?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2