TECHNET Archives

July 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mary Grace Keenan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:01:33 -0400
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
My instinct is to say yes. It is a concern. You should be able to rinse the
lead from the pads by double tinning with the Sn95 solder. If this is a
critical application you should confirm that the rinse works. ESD or XRF
would be useful.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Mary Grace Keenan <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I have a question regarding using the high temp solder after removing
> standard solder Sn63/Pb37.  After wicking away the standard solder, we need
> to re-solder the wiring and components using the high temp solder
> (Sn95/Ag5).   We are concerned that the integrity of the solder joint and
> the temperature rating may be negatively affected.  Is this a legitimate
> concern?  Any suggestions?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2