It's a matter of useful information, not raw data (BS). I'll show you mine
if you'll show me yours.

Seems like most folks have shown their all and it appears in favor of less
is more but as Daan said, more only is 10%. What's IPC's take on all this.
What standard/rule/data/info is right. Most all of industry, as exemplified
on this forum, points to paste flux, for rework instead of solder paste,
whether applied crudely, rudely, or with MoonMan's flare for exactomundo by
microstenciling the stuff.

The MoonMan's and Werner's take to all this is flux it. It's still too
simple to flux up but where are the standards?

Thanks Dave for putting it all into perspective, or not.

MoonMan

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------