 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sTvfQ-0000HHC; Thu, 6 Jul 95 13:28 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!smtplink.dsccc.com!geiland> |
| Date: |
Thu, 06 Jul 95 12:50:10 CST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ebwSY3.0._g8.Sj2_l"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
21:57 1996 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What methods are available to measure flux deposition/amount? Is
there a target amount that will yield acceptable results from a
In Circuit Test and cleanliness standpoint?
What is the best method to monitor cleanliness in a no-clean
process?
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: No-clean Process Controls
Author: [log in to unmask] at SMTPLINK
Date: 7/6/95 10:12
Mr. Li,
Could you be more specific in your question? I have been closely involved in
all of the phases of the Cleaning and Cleanliness Test Program. What aspect
of control are you interested in: flux amount, handling, etc? I wrote the
majority of the text for TR-582, so if you could contact me, I could explain
further.
Douglas Pauls
Contamination Studies Laboratories
[log in to unmask]
Phone: 317-457-8095
|
|
|
