TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:53:08 EDT
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
In a message dated 10/27/2000 9:06:15 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Before I would recommend looking for contamination, I would do some
>  solderability testing of the components.  Component lead solderability
testing is pretty
>  straight forward and can imploy accelerated aging through steam prior to
>  testing.  Then if  there was a problem, and depending on what the de-wet
or non-wet areas
> looked  like would I continue with contamination testing.


I agree with Susan.  While a residue could be the cause of poor
solderability, it is more often a case of oxidation, which contamination
testing won't address.  Sequential Electrochemical Reduction Analysis (SERA),
in the hands of a good operator, can tell you a great deal about the oxide
picture present.

Doug Pauls
CSL

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2