TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:31:29 -0700
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, "Edward Hare, <SEM Lab, Inc.>" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
"Edward Hare, <SEM Lab, Inc.>" <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
Wanner Bernhard <[log in to unmask]>, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
SEM Lab, Inc.
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
Wanner,

I have recently seen leaky chip capacitors where the failure was apparently
caused by very small internal cracks between one or two plates.  The cracks
appeared to be caused by sintering defects.  It is not clear to me whether or
not these cracks can be caused by external stress (i.e. thermal or bending).
There were no cracks visible on the external surfaces of the components.  The
carcks do not look like the cracks normally associated with thermal or bending
stresses which tend to cross multiple plates initiating near a termination and
travelling through the stack at an angle.

Ed


Wanner Bernhard wrote:

> Hi Ed
>
> As manufacturer of power supplies we are using also chip cpacitors.
> For years we have had no problems with chip capacitors. The analysis of the
> field returns shows no problem with chip cap's.
>
> Now (since some weeks) we have problems because failing chip cap's.
> This failing chip cap's shows a conductivity like a resistor. There are no
> visible cracks (may be cracks would be visible using a REM).
>
> As a first thesis we assume a problem at a subcontractor because inadequate
> reflow-temperatureprofile (to high reflow temp and/or to high initial
> warm-up rate).
>
> As second thesis the cap-manufacturer could have a problem, because since
> some months the same cap-size is smaller. May be this cap redesign has
> caused this leackage problem.
>
> Because this cap leackage is a real problem for us. I would be very
> interested to get any informations about possible failure mechanism (or to
> hear about the current field/application problems).
>
> Best regards
> Bernhard Wanner (QA Manager)
> Melcher AG, Switzerland
> www.melcher.ch (and also www.power-one.com)
>
>
>         ----------
>         Von:  Edward Hare, <SEM Lab, Inc.>[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>         Gesendet: Freitag, 20. August 1999 16:16
>         An:  [log in to unmask]
>         Betreff:   [TN] Chip Capacitors
>
>         Hi all,
>
>         I would like to hear from anyone who can estimate their
> manufacturing
>         yield impact due to failure of chip capacitors, i.e. due to cracks,
>         leakage, etc.  I have been doing failure analysis on these types of
> part
>         issues and I am trying to benchmark expected yield and/or failure
> rates
>         under "normal" conditions.
>
>         Any help would be sincerely appreciated!
>
>         Best Regards,
>         Ed Hare
>         --
>
>                        SEM Lab, Inc.
>         Scanning Electron Microscopy and Failure Analysis
>                        Snohomish, WA
>                        (425)335-4400
>                    http://www.sem-lab.com
>
>         ##############################################################
>         TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
>         ##############################################################
>         To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in
>         the body:
>         To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
>         To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
>         ##############################################################
>         Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
>         information.
>         If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at
> [log in to unmask] or
>         847-509-9700 ext.5365
>         ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2