TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Spray Fluxer
From:
Cory and Lise Steeby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Aug 1999 12:28:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Cory and Lise Steeby <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
Hello Technet

We currently use a reciprocating head type spray fluxer and are
contemplating turning it into a series of stationary heads instead.  The
boards we run are consistent enough that width will not be a problem.  Has
anyone had experience with a similar setup or does anyone have advice to
offer?

We want to eliminate some of the PM required on the reciprocating head
cylinder due to overspray.

Thanks in advance,

Cory Steeby
EBW Electronics
[log in to unmask]

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2