TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0utHb9-0000PMC; Wed, 21 Aug 96 13:01 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:06:29 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5870
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"G8v193.0.yZL.Ayq6o"@ipc>
X-Juno-Line-Breaks:
1,3-4,6,8
From:
[log in to unmask] (David M Fulmer)
Subject:
From [log in to unmask] Thu Aug 22 06:
12:43 1996
X-Mailer:
Juno 1.00
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Topic:	Surface moisture affecting operational amplifier output
drift on a FR-4 multi-layer PCB.
	(board layup) -  1).  component layer,   2).  ground plane,   3).
 power plane,  4). solder side layer

Question:	When shielding the input pins of an operational
amplifier with guard rings, is it recommended to 
	expose the guard traces (solder over tin reflow), rather than
covering them with solder mask ?

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2