Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:50:32 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<1DCD80443C7C4CCC9BEC329D27E30FFD@MikeLaptop> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One of the original reasons for the introduction of machines was the
difficulty of doing repeatable tests by hand. For example "hygiene" on all
glassware has to be perfect as a single finger print can send you off scale.
The machines self clean themselves and as importantly their working fluid.
Get a bigger tank!
Regards
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Louis Hart
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] under-mask cleanliness of large panel
TechNetters, we have a panel that is too large to fit in the test tank of an
Omegameter. Dimensions, in inches, are 21 x 24. Is there an Omegameter-like
instrument, or another model of Omegameter, that can accommodate such a
large panel?
One of our people suggested 'washing' the panel, a la the IPC test method
for ROSE, and putting the solution into the Omega meter. How well would that
work?
Any other ideas? Thanks....
Louis Hart
Compunetics
Monroeville, PA
USA
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
412-858-1232
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|