 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t0uKX-0000GvC; Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:43 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 5 Oct 1995 12:43:28 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| cc: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
00:36 1996 |
| TO: |
Jim Marsico <"marsico%Organization=Industrial & Mfg'g Engineering%Telephone=516-595-5879"@a1.allin1.ALLIN1.umc> |
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ss-6x2.0.jGI.3b1Tm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
<61803150015991/98221@ALLIN1> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9510051209.C47270-0100000@ipc> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There is not a perfect answer to this question. I say this because there
will not be an established QPL for the J-STD-004, 005, and 006. My
opinion is that the material vendors have done sufficient testing to
indicate that they have performed qualification testing per 004, 005, and
006. However as the 004 and 005 are based on residue activity (L-Low,
M-Medium and H-High) as opposed to R RMA and RA, I would expect to see
some reclassifications by the vendors which must be taken into account by
the users.
I hope this helps.
***************************************************
David W. Bergman, Technical Director
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
708-509-9700 x340 Phone
708-509-9798 Fax
email [log in to unmask]
***************************************************
On Thu, 5 Oct 1995, Jim Marsico wrote:
> Do fluxes and solder pastes which met the requirements (and are on the QPL) of
> the Mil Specs (MIL-F-14256 and QQ-S-571 respectively) automatically qualify to
> the IPC replacement documents (J-STD-004 & -005)?
>
>
|
|
|
