Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uWQhO-0000CoC; Wed, 19 Jun 96 12:05 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
<buetmi> |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 12:05:42 -0500 (CDT) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
cc: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 21 08: |
39:41 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"o7VBA3.0.Oo8.fD3on"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9606191228.F62220-0100000@ipc> |
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Peter:
IPC developed such a list and published it in the October/November 1995
issue of the IPC Review (page 13).
I'll have a copy faxed to you.
Mike Buetow
IPC Technical Staff
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062
P: 847-509-9700, ext. 335
F: 847-509-9798
[log in to unmask]
On Wed, 19 Jun 1996, Peter Swanson wrote:
> One of our customers has to write a report detailing the changes
> between IPC-A-610B and the previous revision A. Has anyone already done this,
> and would be willing to share?
>
> TIA, Peter
>
> I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
> Peter Swanson Oxfordshire, England
> Dynamix Technology Ltd, IPC/UK
> [log in to unmask] Compuserve: 100120,3641
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Peter_Swanson
>
> If it weren't for the last minute, nothing would ever get done.
> I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
>
>
|
|
|