LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


October 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

automated response (1 message)
AW: [TN] Carbon Pads (1 message)
AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer (3 messages)
AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question (1 message)
AW: [TN] standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly (1 message)
BGA corner "L" shape glue removal process (3 messages)
Board question (3 messages)
CALCE Prediction of Potential Failures Risks in Toyota Vehicles Confirmed by NASA Scientists (2 messages)
Carbon Pads (4 messages)
Cleaning/Contamination Book (1 message)
Component mass? (1 message)
Component sectioning labs (6 messages)
CTE Controlled Laminate (2 messages)
Delam or Inner Core Bond Enhance Anomaly or something else? (4 messages)
Denderetic Growth Clip (4 messages)
Dielectric Constant of FR-4 over temperature (4 messages)
dimensional measurements (1 message)
Discoloration on plated over vias (33 messages)
ESD packaging material issue (11 messages)
Exposed Copper Detection (7 messages)
EXTERNAL: Re: [TN] [DC] QFN layout (1 message)
FR1 (5 messages)
FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes (5 messages)
High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB (10 messages)
How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board? (21 messages)
In-Circuit Testing Standards (2 messages)
Jax Remix - PCBWest 2011 (1 message)
Lacing tape (2 messages)
Laser Depaneling (1 message)
maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask (7 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer (9 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question (43 messages)
NTC [TN] Wire soldering question (1 message)
ORH1 flux residues (15 messages)
PCBA Packaging Standards (3 messages)
Plan for IPC APEX EXPO 2012 (1 message)
Pre-tinning Oxidized IC Leads (4 messages)
Query on extra NPTH (2 messages)
R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards (6 messages)
Reflow of BGA (7 messages)
Rookie question on RMA fluxes (30 messages)
SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required (8 messages)
Solder Mask Request (1 message)
Soldermask recommendation (7 messages)
Soldermask undercut definitions (1 message)
standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly (2 messages)
Strength of 63/37 at Various Temperatures (4 messages)
SV: [TN] How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board? (1 message)
The Use of Tack Soldering (5 messages)
used equipment (7 messages)
Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish? (11 messages)
Wire soldering question (14 messages)
Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion (15 messages)
[DC] QFN layout (33 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

automated response

automated response

Jonathan Griffiths Merlin Circuit Technology Ltd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:58:17 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Carbon Pads

AW: [TN] Carbon Pads

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:27:15 +0000

180 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:41:29 +0000

253 lines

Re: AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:28:14 -0500

340 lines

AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:13:43 +0000

292 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

AW: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:29:33 +0000

197 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly

AW: [TN] standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:29:05 +0000

192 lines

New Thread

BGA corner "L" shape glue removal process

BGA corner "L" shape glue removal process

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:05:25 -0500

36 lines

Re: BGA corner "L" shape glue removal process

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:19:19 -0700

94 lines

Re: BGA corner "L" shape glue removal process

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:43:19 -0500

113 lines

New Thread

Board question

Re: Board question

Leif Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:02:11 -0500

120 lines

Re: Board question

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:15:52 +0000

115 lines

Re: Board question

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:41:21 +0200

118 lines

New Thread

CALCE Prediction of Potential Failures Risks in Toyota Vehicles Confirmed by NASA Scientists

CALCE Prediction of Potential Failures Risks in Toyota Vehicles Confirmed by NASA Scientists

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:14:51 -0400

86 lines

Re: CALCE Prediction of Potential Failures Risks in Toyota Vehicles Confirmed by NASA Scientists

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 04:25:35 -0700

110 lines

New Thread

Carbon Pads

Carbon Pads

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:53:29 -0400

99 lines

Re: Carbon Pads

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:59:27 -0600

148 lines

Re: Carbon Pads

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:10:28 +0200

125 lines

Re: Carbon Pads

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:33:24 -0400

156 lines

New Thread

Cleaning/Contamination Book

Re: Cleaning/Contamination Book

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:30:19 +0300

64 lines

New Thread

Component mass?

Component mass?

Braddock, Iain (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:45:58 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Component sectioning labs

Component sectioning labs

Gavin B. Fowdur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:00:49 -0500

29 lines

Re: Component sectioning labs

Ahmad, Syed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:51:56 -0700

59 lines

Re: Component sectioning labs

Ahmad, Syed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:53:22 -0700

62 lines

Re: Component sectioning labs

Francesco Di Maio <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:37:21 +0200

108 lines

Re: Component sectioning labs

Marino Verderio <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:36:26 +0200

42 lines

Re: Component sectioning labs

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:41:09 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

CTE Controlled Laminate

CTE Controlled Laminate

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:12:18 -0400

55 lines

Re: CTE Controlled Laminate

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:32:06 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

Delam or Inner Core Bond Enhance Anomaly or something else?

Delam or Inner Core Bond Enhance Anomaly or something else?

John Balchunas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:56:59 -0500

63 lines

Re: Delam or Inner Core Bond Enhance Anomaly or something else?

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:30:24 +0000

68 lines

Re: Delam or Inner Core Bond Enhance Anomaly or something else?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:17:21 -0400

104 lines

Re: Delam or Inner Core Bond Enhance Anomaly or something else?

John Balchunas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:19:40 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

Denderetic Growth Clip

Denderetic Growth Clip

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:13:48 -0500

42 lines

Re: Denderetic Growth Clip

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:22:55 -0400

83 lines

Re: Denderetic Growth Clip

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 11:29:46 +0200

68 lines

Re: Denderetic Growth Clip

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:31:30 +0300

73 lines

New Thread

Dielectric Constant of FR-4 over temperature

Dielectric Constant of FR-4 over temperature

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:26:09 -0400

51 lines

Re: Dielectric Constant of FR-4 over temperature

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:40:07 +0000

92 lines

Re: Dielectric Constant of FR-4 over temperature

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:58:28 +0000

70 lines

Re: Dielectric Constant of FR-4 over temperature

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:47:34 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

dimensional measurements

dimensional measurements

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:33:20 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Discoloration on plated over vias

Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:26:17 -0400

83 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Vladimir Igoshev. PhD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:46:43 -0400

51 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:30:31 +0200

129 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:38:54 -0500

137 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:16:59 -0700

154 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:49:46 -0400

176 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:54:05 -0400

157 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:01:43 -0400

182 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:34:19 -0500

186 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:39:57 -0500

215 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:40:52 -0500

227 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:41:10 -0400

203 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:47:45 -0500

248 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:06:16 +0000

137 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:21:14 -0400

106 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:42:18 +0000

85 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:55:22 -0500

189 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:25 -0700

218 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:08:02 +0000

128 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:27:21 -0400

261 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:50:16 +0000

196 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:55:29 -0400

330 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:00:20 +0000

189 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:17:51 -0500

230 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:19:15 -0500

229 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:33:41 -0500

280 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:37:26 +0000

171 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:39:10 -0500

137 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:41:46 -0500

291 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:43:47 -0400

81 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:44:44 -0400

312 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:59:57 -0500

128 lines

Re: Discoloration on plated over vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:00:18 -0500

283 lines

New Thread

ESD packaging material issue

ESD packaging material issue

E-Mail Forum Wayne Knapp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:12:47 -0500

33 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:58:11 -0700

86 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:11:49 -0500

152 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:26:28 -0500

98 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:26:59 -0500

181 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:41:20 +0100

194 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:44:22 -0700

217 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:50:15 +0800

122 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:10:24 +0000

151 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:03:33 -0500

172 lines

Re: ESD packaging material issue

Knapp, Wayne B <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:01:45 -0500

210 lines

New Thread

Exposed Copper Detection

Exposed Copper Detection

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:05:51 -0500

32 lines

Re: Exposed Copper Detection

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:23:40 -0700

72 lines

Re: Exposed Copper Detection

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:07:15 -0400

63 lines

Re: Exposed Copper Detection

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:41:12 -0500

77 lines

Re: Exposed Copper Detection

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:02:54 -0400

109 lines

Re: Exposed Copper Detection

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:06:42 +0000

63 lines

Re: Exposed Copper Detection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:34:40 -0700

95 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: Re: [TN] [DC] QFN layout

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [TN] [DC] QFN layout

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 06:01:28 -0400

147 lines

New Thread

FR1

FR1

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:31:36 -0500

32 lines

Re: FR1

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:32:11 -0500

89 lines

Re: FR1

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:24:44 -0500

180 lines

Re: FR1

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:09:50 -0400

121 lines

Re: FR1

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:55:01 -0500

180 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes

FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:24:53 -0700

467 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:03:30 -0700

511 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:33:36 -0400

561 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:34:22 -0700

521 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:01:10 +0100

581 lines

New Thread

High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Fabien Guizelin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:39:22 +0000

37 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:07:22 -0700

112 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Fabien Guizelin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:30:55 +0000

136 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:49:05 -0500

188 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:54:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:28:03 +0200

70 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:06:48 -0700

213 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:43:50 -0400

184 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:57:20 -0400

228 lines

Re: High Phosphorous content on ENIG PCB

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:14:55 +0200

276 lines

New Thread

How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[MANTECH SRS TECHNOLOGIES] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:31:08 -0500

57 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:16:21 -0400

102 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:03:14 -0500

117 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:03:21 +0200

108 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:50:17 +0200

220 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:48:13 -0400

161 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:31:16 +0200

200 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:26:55 -0500

31 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:43:18 -0700

450 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:08:23 -0500

570 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:28:56 -0500

151 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Reuven. ROKAH <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:40:06 +0200

184 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:41:27 +0200

544 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:57:48 +0000

575 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:52:45 -0400

666 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:37:47 -0500

606 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:08:06 -0500

730 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:10:44 -0700

666 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:54:03 -0500

680 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:23:43 -0500

626 lines

Re: How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:49:06 -0500

582 lines

New Thread

In-Circuit Testing Standards

In-Circuit Testing Standards

Doug Schueller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:24:36 +0000

49 lines

Re: In-Circuit Testing Standards

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:56:02 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

Jax Remix - PCBWest 2011

Jax Remix - PCBWest 2011

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:48:02 -0500

188 lines

New Thread

Lacing tape

Lacing tape

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:30:01 -0700

90 lines

Re: Lacing tape

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:14:23 -0700

127 lines

New Thread

Laser Depaneling

Re: Laser Depaneling

Stephan Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:17:33 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:45:13 -0400

49 lines

Re: maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:05:37 -0400

91 lines

Re: maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:34:57 -0400

124 lines

Re: maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:55:45 -0700

172 lines

Re: maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:19:35 +0200

84 lines

Re: maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:49:57 -0500

82 lines

Re: maximum height of artifacts above the soldermask

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:00:15 -0400

122 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:24:05 -0500

206 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:41:35 -0500

208 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:40:45 +0000

252 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:29:48 -0500

262 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:40:43 -0500

277 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:16:46 -0500

213 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Giamis, Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:26:12 -0500

281 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:20:33 -0500

233 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:09:08 -0400

268 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 00:10:59 -0500

191 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:02:57 +0100

240 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:32:04 -0400

220 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:07:59 -0500

158 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:24:08 +0000

229 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:41:25 -0500

228 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:48:29 -0400

164 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Giamis, Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:51:02 -0500

242 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:03:27 -0400

248 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:41:29 -0500

195 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:16:07 -0500

48 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:03:29 +0300

219 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:05:18 -0400

224 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:29:13 -0400

285 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:46:24 +0000

259 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:35:12 -0500

304 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:41:53 +0300

219 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:51:51 -0500

159 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:57:25 -0500

199 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:10:02 -0400

31 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:53:46 +0000

228 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:54:05 -0500

48 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:01:31 -0500

61 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:08:05 -0400

253 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:27:11 -0700

376 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:11:10 -0500

201 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Giamis, Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:27:39 -0500

236 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:22:52 -0400

240 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:13:45 -0500

203 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:52:40 -0500

162 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:20:10 -0700

261 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:55:14 -0500

49 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:59:20 -0400

289 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:13:27 -0500

331 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:49:03 +0000

236 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:21:14 -0500

332 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:34:53 -0500

382 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:37:45 +0000

236 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:32:10 +0000

380 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:34:27 -0500

259 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:25:40 -0700

454 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:31:01 -0400

365 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:33:54 +0000

405 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Wire soldering question

Re: NTC [TN] Wire soldering question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:10:44 -0500

290 lines

New Thread

ORH1 flux residues

ORH1 flux residues

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:49:06 -0700

61 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:12:12 -0400

96 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Mumtaz Bora <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:35:46 -0700

123 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:28:11 -0500

28 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:20:38 -0500

124 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:52:22 -0400

190 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:26:34 -0500

35 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:39:33 -0500

66 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:15:53 -0400

93 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:54:23 -0700

123 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:28:36 -0500

185 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:43:42 -0400

228 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:09:07 -0500

38 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:20:00 -0500

81 lines

Re: ORH1 flux residues

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:39:14 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

PCBA Packaging Standards

PCBA Packaging Standards

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:56:34 +0000

45 lines

Re: PCBA Packaging Standards

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:35:40 +0200

91 lines

Re: PCBA Packaging Standards

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:09:58 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

Plan for IPC APEX EXPO 2012

Plan for IPC APEX EXPO 2012

Gayle Pervos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:41:33 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Pre-tinning Oxidized IC Leads

Pre-tinning Oxidized IC Leads

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:58:08 -0400

71 lines

Re: Pre-tinning Oxidized IC Leads

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:00:29 -0500

116 lines

Re: Pre-tinning Oxidized IC Leads

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:27:55 -0500

124 lines

Re: Pre-tinning Oxidized IC Leads

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:54:42 +0200

128 lines

New Thread

Query on extra NPTH

Query on extra NPTH

Nagaraj U <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:48:37 +0000

48 lines

Re: Query on extra NPTH

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:33:21 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:56:36 +0200

86 lines

Re: R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 20:14:26 +0200

140 lines

Re: R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:53:26 +0000

180 lines

R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:24:56 +0200

139 lines

R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:34:31 +0200

133 lines

Re: R: [TN] PCBA Packaging Standards

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 20:40:11 +0000

169 lines

New Thread

Reflow of BGA

Reflow of BGA

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:10:29 +0000

38 lines

Re: Reflow of BGA

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:15:44 -0400

78 lines

Re: Reflow of BGA

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:21:09 -0500

92 lines

Re: Reflow of BGA

Chris Knudsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:32:26 -0400

116 lines

Re: Reflow of BGA

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[MANTECH SRS TECHNOLOGIES] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:40:11 -0500

88 lines

Re: Reflow of BGA

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:54:57 -0400

140 lines

Re: Reflow of BGA

Harp, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:38 +0000

184 lines

New Thread

Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:07:53 -0400

63 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:45:00 -0400

120 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400

162 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:54:24 -0400

107 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:08:24 -0400

212 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:18:13 -0500

254 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:25:04 -0700

284 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:35:45 -0700

350 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:49:36 -0400

361 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:54:10 -0500

40 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:01:48 -0400

410 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:03:29 -0400

476 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:28:13 -0500

164 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:42:26 -0400

175 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:16:03 +0000

212 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[MANTECH SRS TECHNOLOGIES] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:54:04 -0500

193 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:34:21 -0500

222 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:43:39 +0000

212 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:07:44 -0700

241 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:02:33 -0400

275 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:17:44 -0700

304 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:25:36 -0400

313 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:36:33 -0400

240 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:43:05 -0500

241 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:42:16 +0000

322 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:53:56 -0500

37 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:04:24 -0400

391 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:13:12 -0400

421 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:01:26 +0000

415 lines

Re: Rookie question on RMA fluxes

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:17:28 -0500

123 lines

New Thread

SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

prashant chopra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:42:10 +0530

46 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:16:02 +0000

64 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:27:24 -0400

87 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:35:53 +0000

111 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:00:07 -0400

157 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:32:06 +0300

85 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:56:20 -0500

54 lines

Re: SMD Component spacing guideline -- help required

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:40:28 -0400

121 lines

New Thread

Solder Mask Request

Solder Mask Request

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:21:33 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Soldermask recommendation

Soldermask recommendation

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:39:49 -0400

38 lines

Re: Soldermask recommendation

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:11:06 -0700

110 lines

Re: Soldermask recommendation

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:05:46 -0400

163 lines

Re: Soldermask recommendation

Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:44:47 -0700

188 lines

Re: Soldermask recommendation

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:57:18 -0700

261 lines

Re: Soldermask recommendation

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:16:00 -0400

292 lines

Re: Soldermask recommendation

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 22:46:18 -0400

330 lines

New Thread

Soldermask undercut definitions

Soldermask undercut definitions

winning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:18:05 +0800

40 lines

New Thread

standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly

Re: standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 15:53:38 -0500

98 lines

Re: standard industry silkscreened symbology for Pb-free assembly

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 17:02:04 -0700

137 lines

New Thread

Strength of 63/37 at Various Temperatures

Strength of 63/37 at Various Temperatures

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:37:49 -0500

35 lines

Re: Strength of 63/37 at Various Temperatures

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:55:30 -0400

77 lines

Re: Strength of 63/37 at Various Temperatures

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:34:02 +0000

80 lines

Re: Strength of 63/37 at Various Temperatures

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:34:33 +0200

105 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

SV: [TN] How do we determine the Maximum Acceptable Moisture Content (MAMC) for a board?

Per-Erik Tegehall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:51:00 +0200

149 lines

New Thread

The Use of Tack Soldering

The Use of Tack Soldering

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:32:31 -0500

40 lines

Re: The Use of Tack Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:24:38 -0500

85 lines

Re: The Use of Tack Soldering

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:21:20 -0700

145 lines

Re: The Use of Tack Soldering

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:34:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: The Use of Tack Soldering

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:32:00 -0300

87 lines

New Thread

used equipment

used equipment

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:50:54 -0400

39 lines

Re: used equipment

Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:03:10 -0700

81 lines

Re: used equipment

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:04:34 -0500

72 lines

Re: used equipment

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:58:12 +0200

66 lines

Re: used equipment

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:42:39 +0000

113 lines

Re: used equipment

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:44:53 -0500

43 lines

Re: used equipment

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:29:31 +0000

105 lines

New Thread

Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:19:24 -0500

51 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:52:42 -0400

98 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Terry Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:10:08 -0400

131 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:14:38 -0400

97 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:42:45 -0400

125 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:12:16 -0500

49 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:54:39 -0400

144 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:59:32 -0400

184 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:49:01 -0400

231 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:27:13 -0500

188 lines

Re: Whiskers from Immersion Tin Finish?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:32:31 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

Wire soldering question

Wire soldering question

Keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:55:41 -0400

53 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:12:59 -0500

109 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:33:34 -0700

88 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:27:10 +0200

99 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:59:43 +0300

123 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:20:20 +0200

155 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:29:03 -0400

149 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:21:04 -0500

232 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:22:10 -0500

133 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:43:47 -0700

189 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:38:29 -0700

145 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:18:00 -0500

24 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:40:46 -0700

50 lines

Re: Wire soldering question

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:11:47 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:14:28 -0500

204 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:33:32 -0400

224 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:58:05 -0500

269 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:10:37 -0400

76 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:27:50 -0400

108 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:35:29 +0300

110 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:05:10 -0500

133 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:05:47 -0500

272 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:24:35 -0500

300 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:32:08 -0400

292 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:42:16 -0400

297 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:18:51 +0300

352 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:30:23 -0400

426 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:14:14 -0500

375 lines

Re: Wire soldering question - Utrasonics discussion

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:16:05 -0500

312 lines

New Thread

[DC] QFN layout

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:44:29 -0400

122 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Braddock, Iain (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:10:59 +0100

171 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:32:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:29:14 -0400

67 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:39:18 -0400

150 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:51:18 -0400

174 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:08:56 -0700

248 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:48:46 -0400

248 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:46:23 -0700

314 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:59:22 -0400

312 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:21:33 -0700

382 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:49:53 -0500

49 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:00:38 -0500

68 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:16:24 -0400

44 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:13:47 -0700

113 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:34:11 +0800

431 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Bush, Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:38:12 -0400

476 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Braddock, Iain (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:10:44 +0100

494 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:06:34 -0400

520 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:17:50 -0400

297 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:58:12 -0400

217 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:01:35 -0400

473 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:40:17 -0400

254 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Braddock, Iain (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:31:33 +0100

568 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:06:49 -0500

40 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:23:36 -0400

609 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:53:53 +0800

303 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:15:56 -0400

191 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:10:35 -0400

251 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:11:51 -0400

222 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:15:55 -0400

258 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[MANTECH SRS TECHNOLOGIES] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:16:55 -0500

296 lines

Re: [DC] QFN layout

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:05:29 +0000

254 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager