TECHNET Archives

September 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:46:37 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (132 lines)
Painfully conscious when sober Earl ;
always enjoy straight point .

However, talking drowsy :
how did Steve came to this ; I've been answering Bruce's . ?
And where have you been hibernating ; this went around on 7th September .
I know yo' folks are bit slow behind (the date line) ; but this is bit
extreme .
Moonwalking like this, you have the hide to "wake" me up on rechews ?

Disregarding the cosmetics I agree with you it is rather pathological
approach to process ;
we all have our ways , this one pays of with FDA , EC ; ISO ........... ;
inspections love to "see" something they can comprehend .
Don't give them simple things to tick and you spoil the game both ways .

Did you ever had a tie round your neck ? to call me a pretender ?

What is one of your "normal" MLB's ; bigfoot's footprints in ketchup ?
And please think of your future customers before you answer this one .


Cheers mate, good to hear you any way             paul


-----Original Message-----
From: pod [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 1999 14:46
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.; Paul Klasek
Subject: Re: Re: [TN] FW: Susceptibility of surface finishes to skin
oils


Paul, wake up. Thought you and Steve would be interested in one of our
normal MLB's.

Enjoy,

Earl
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: Susceptibility of surface finishes to skin oils


> Good practice Bruce ; as you said: than it works in store ;
> and the result is very variable :
> It is commonly known as "rust finger" nickname in toolmakers circles :
> when you have a highly polished XYQZ supersteel moulding tool ;
> some of the unfortunate fellows are literally banned from work on fishing
> stages .
> As the body acids do vary (you tell me, coke?, bad wine?, hormones?);
> to see fingerprints developing on running tool is expensive business .
> Gold I didn't see as critical as osp .
> Our guys are trained : hold the edges only (anytime) .
> They usually remember that only when I'm around .
>
> PAUL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Tostevin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 1999 6:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] FW: Susceptibility of surface finishes to skin oils
>
>
> > Is anyone aware of data or studies on whether or not, gold and OSP
surface
> > finishes are more susceptible to surface oils than HASL?   We wear
cotton
> > gloves at incoming inspection, and on several smt lines,  where we
inspect
> > and run non-HASL boards.  There is a concern about fingerprint oils
> > degrading the finish on an OSP board, which may sit several weeks in
> > storage, and the concern with the immersion gold boards is that the thin
> > finish is porous, and skin oils might cause nickel oxidation.  Is anyone
> > else doing this, or are we overly concerned about the vulnerability of
> > these finishes to skin oils?
> >
> > Bruce Tostevin
> > Benchmark Electronics
> > Hudson, New Hampshire
> >
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following
> text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2