DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ray Humphrey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:56:33 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Thank you Karl.  Yes, I'm aware that the 222* series replaced 275, but I
don't know if the data is any different concerning this topic.  If you, or
anyone else, could check and let me know, I would appreciate it.  (I have
275 but not 222*)  I am in the process of writing a program that needs this
information.  Perhaps an email or fax of the relevant pages wouldn't be too
much to ask (of someone) until I can get the latest IP-222* documents?

Thank you in advance,
Ray Humphrey
DynaCad Design Services
Voice: (503) 642-4040
FAX: (503) 591-8767

----- Original Message -----
From: Karl J. Bates <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: [DC] IPC Specs - Errors?


> Ray,
> Regarding your question...
>      Has IPC published a correction to this?
>
> Yes they have... the IPC-222* series, I think the IPC-D-275 has been
> superseded or obsolete ?
>
> Karl
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2