TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Greysonne Jorgenson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:25:12 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
A question:

I am interpreting IPC-A-600, 2.10.3 Annular ring-suppoerted holes as:

Annular ring less than .002" at any point around the circumference is
considered breakout. Any area with breakout (< .002") for 90 degress or more
around the circumference is not acceptable (class 1-2 supported hole)

I had someone tell me that even when there is no visible annular
(measureable to .002" or greater)ring for 90 degrees or greater, you should
take into account the thickness of hte hole barrel/wall, there is enough
plating around the hole wall to meet the requirements of IPC.

I find this hard to believe, and would appreciate other opinions.

G~


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2