Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:56:46 -0400 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
X-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Grant;
I found this happen when we changed from 4% solids to 2% solids, solder
balls start appears at one specific area in the board, and we wouldn't be
able to eliminate the problem, I only reduced it by increasing the pre
heating temperature.The situation was exactily the same, I changed only the
flux and the other parameters were held constant.
Thanx
Jorge Dourado de Santana
Maintenance / Process Engr
Microtec - Brazil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Emandien [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 20 de Agosto de 1999 08:51
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Solder/Flux/ICT Issue
>
> Hi again,
> Thanks for all the input as it has now directed me towards fluxes (and
> control thereof) and ICT.
> Leading from one of the members advice of low residue flux I stumbled
> across
> this Kester comment:
> 'Flux selection does have some play as to the occurrence of solder balls.
> A
> rule of thumb is that the lower the solids content of the flux is the more
> solder balls will be noted when all other parameters are held constant.
> This
> is sort of a dilemma for us as a flux manufacturer in that if we increase
> the solids content, we will more than likely have an adverse impact on
> probe
> testing of final soldered assemblies. The aesthetics of the final soldered
> assembly will also be affected as you can imagine.' This was posted in
> 1993
> so any idea on what has since transpired and is this statement still valid
> wrt the solids content?
> Geez, my research thusfar has brought an array of variables to this party
> such as test pin profiles and type, gold plating vs gold alloy, pin base
> material hardness, spring force etc. on the ICT aside. Nevertheless it is
> now beginning to get interesting.
> As a comment, I hope my research drives me away from introducing another
> process i.e. cleaning of assemblies hence and control of flux effluent (we
> are coincidentally reviewing ISO14000) etc. and rather focus on improving
> the existing process i.e. flux residue reduction (without cleaning) and
> ICT
> issues.
> Thanks again to all,
> Grant
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
|
|