TECHNET Archives

April 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 7 Apr 1999 20:14:33 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
In a message dated 05/04/99  06:46:26PM,  [log in to unmask]
writes:

SNIP
>  Are you sure gold embrittlement is really a problem?  I don't recall having
>  ever seen any metallurgical reports that say what Au does in Sn96/Ag3.5, so
>  I'm not sure that its limitations are the same as those of Sn63 and
similar.
>  I do recall having worked with the Sn96/Ag3.5 and similar solders years ago
>  and producing some of the ugliest solder joints ever conceived, in a
> cosmetic
>  sense.  The solder joints were quite strong and did the job intended.


Sn96 is more tolerant of Au than Sn63 under the same conditions.
Approximately:
The problem of gold embrittlement is the ratio of Au to Sn, as there is 50%
more Sn in the  SN96, the gold leached into the joint will be 2/3 the level
(with respect to the tin) compared to the same amount (of Au) in a Sn63 joint.

Mike Fenner

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2