TECHNET Archives

August 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Phillip E. Hinton" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 11 Aug 1998 10:20:39 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
All,

The question was about the interprtation of the allowance to go to 40X to
verify a defect seen at 1.75X

Measurement oif the size of the defect has nothing to do with the higher
magnification allowance.  The spec. allows going up to 40X so that the
inspector may verify that his defect is really a defect.  Often at 1.75X
shadows at a nodule, small pits or roughness etc.may appear to be a defect,
but when a better viewing at up to 40X is used, it is found to be acceptable.

Phil Hinton

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2