If you specified 0.002" than I would say allowed. If you specified
0.0020" than not allowed. Also what is your accuracy of measurement??
Jeff Garland
Richard MacCutcheon wrote:
> I have an ongoing arguement with someone. If there is .0018" of
> annular
> ring, are you allowed to "round-up" to .002"? This is based on the
> fact
> that the measuring device resolves to four decimal places but the
> spec. only
> gives three.
>
> I think a minimum is just that, nothing below is acceptable. Your
> thoughts..........
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional information.
> For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.311
> ##############################################################
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################