If you specified 0.002" than I would say allowed. If you specified 0.0020" than not allowed. Also what is your accuracy of measurement?? Jeff Garland Richard MacCutcheon wrote: > I have an ongoing arguement with someone. If there is .0018" of > annular > ring, are you allowed to "round-up" to .002"? This is based on the > fact > that the measuring device resolves to four decimal places but the > spec. only > gives three. > > I think a minimum is just that, nothing below is acceptable. Your > thoughts.......... > > ############################################################## > TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV > 1.8c > ############################################################## > To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with > following text in the body: > To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> > To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET > ############################################################## > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for > additional information. > For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or > 847-509-9700 ext.311 > ############################################################## ############################################################## TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c ############################################################## To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body: To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET ############################################################## Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information. For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311 ##############################################################