TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet Mail Forum<[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:43:27 -0700
Reply-To:
"TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, David Hoover <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BCA83A.50AB3BA0"
From:
David Hoover <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I had a similar experience using MSA tin lead plating.
The coating started as a tin salt deposit in and on the coating.
It could be seen under a 400X microscope. Then, during
copper plating, the deposit would eventually cover the racks.
We found that a weak caustic dip tank would leach out (off)
the deposit and we could continue plating without the condition
taking place. Our concern was drag in to the cleaning line / plating
line. Good rinsing took care of that.
But it was a manual line.

The above comments are of my own opinion, and
not necessarily that of my employer.

Dave Hoover (aka, Groovy)
NPI Mgr HADCO TC2
Watsonville, CA

----------
From: Hans Rohr <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TECHNET] FAB:Copper/Tin Build-up on Plating Racks


ATOM RSS1 RSS2