Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jul 1997 09:58:23 -0500 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
>From willli Mon Jul 21 09: |
37:05 1997 |
Message-ID: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jul 22 14: |
32:50 1997 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Content-Description: |
cc:Mail note part |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wqJZr-000BkBC; Mon, 21 Jul 97 09:36 CDT |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"7j2d5.0.S-G.vFtqp"@ipc> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mike,
I would estimate that 75%, if not more, of all fabricators in the states have
the capability to fabricate .005 lines/spaces in a production mode. The problem
may be with your fabricator. I'm not aware of of too many PCB shops that can
not fab .005/.005. The game changes once you go beyond this point. I found
most of my fabrication problems occured at .004/.004 and .003/.003 lines/spaces.
What has successfully worked is .004/.006 lines/spaces, respectively. The
spacing is the driving force behind getting good conductor walls and minimizing
overetching. The additional spacing allows for the etch chemistries to
sufficiently etch copper in the tracks (valleys) and be replinished efficiently.
The chemistries used to etch are isotropic, meaning they etch in all directions
proportionally. What I observed on .003/.003 and .004/.004 lines/spaces is
severe undercut, conductor slivers and bridges.
This is not to say .003/.003 and .004/.004 lines/spaces can not be obtained.
The fabricator must have the necessary equipments, chemistries and process
controls in place to do so. I know of several in the inductry that are fab'ing
.003 and .004 lines and spaces in volume, but at a premium. If you need
assistance, I can probably recommend several fab houses in your region for your
current .005/.005 requirement. Hope this helps.
John Gulley
Inet Inc
1255 W. 15th St
Plano, TX 75075-7270
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Standard PCB/PWB Trace Width's
Author: "Michael Forrester"<[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date: 7/18/97 5:38 PM
We currently design boards with 8 mil. traces. We have recently tried to
go to 6 mil. traces and found that we had reliability problems from batch
to batch. What is the smallest trace that is considered reliable by todays
standards? Is it just our PCB/PWB manufacturer that may have a problem.
Typically what we saw was over etching of the traces. Thank you.
Best Regards,
Mike Forrester
LeCroy Corp.
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|