TECHNET Archives

April 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (John Laur)
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:55:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Ralph,

You said:
> I also mention that a good design, where long-term reliability is a
> serious design requirement, does not have closely spaced (~1mm
> edge-to-edge) of plated-through holes on the same grid lines to where
> the reinforcement yarns bridge the spacing between holes.  It is better
> to off-set the plated-through holes either diagonally or such that
> plated-through hole centers are on a grid that is greater than half of
> the sum of their hole diameters.

Does this mean that a 0.016" finished via, drilled at lets say 0.021", would have a center to center spacing of 0.060 minimum  (0.039 + 0.021 = 0.060) ?

---------------------------
John Laur
Rockwell Automation
Allen-Bradley Co Inc.                 
1201 South Second Street
Milwaukee, WI 53204
+1 414 382 2162 (fax)
+1 414 382 2393 (phone)

[log in to unmask]
---------------------------

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2